Designing state-sponsored teacher networks: A comparison of two cases

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 237-266

  Firestone, William A ^a   Pennell, James R ^b  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031495404     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00028312034002237     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Adams, J. (1992). Policy implementation through teacher professional networks: The case of math A in California. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford.
2. Biggam, S. C. (1992, April). The meaning and use of portfolios in statewide assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
3. Brooks, M., & Brooks, J. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. California Department of Education. (1987a). Caught in the middle: Educational reform for young adolescents in California public schools. Sacramento: Author.
5. California Department of Education. (1987b). English-language arts framework. Sacramento: Author.
6. California Department of Education. (1992a). It's elementary: Elementary grades task force report. Sacramento: Author.
7. California Department of Education. (1992b). Mathematics framework: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. Sacramento: Author.
8. California Department of Education. (1992c). Second to none: A vision of the new California high school. Sacramento: Author.
9. Clune, H. W. (1993). The best path to systemic educational policy: Standard/ centralized or differentiated/decentralized. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 233-254.
10. Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. P. (1993). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy (pp. 35-95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Firestone, W. A., & Corbett, H. D. (1988). Planned organizational change. In N.J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 321-340). New York: Longman.
12. Fullan, M.G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Jennings, R. (Ed.). (1993). Fire in the eyes of youth: The humanities in American education. St. Paul, MN: Occasional Press.
14. Kirst, M. W., & Yee, G. (1994). An examination of the evolution of California state educational reform. In Ten years of state educational reform. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
15. Koretz, D., McCaffrey, D., Klein, S., Bell, R., & Stecher, B. (1992). The reliability of scores from the 1992 Vermont portfolio assessment program (Interim report). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Institute on Education and Training National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
16. Koretz, D., Stecher, B., & Deibert, E. (1992). The Vermont portfolio assessment program: Interim report on implementation and impact, 1991-92 school year. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
17. Lichtenstein, G., McLaughlin, M. W., & Knudson, J. (1992). Teacher empowerment and professional knowledge. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The changing context of teaching: 91st NSSE yearbook, Part II (pp. 37-58). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education and University of Chicago Press.
18. Lieberman, A., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1992). Network for educational change: Powerful and problematic. Kappan, 73, 673-677.
19. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-152.
20. Little, J. W., Gerritz, W. H., Stern, D. S., Guthrie, J., Kirst, M. W., & Marsh, D. D. (1987). Staff development in California: Public and personal investment, program patterns, and policy choices. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
21. Little, J. W., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1991). Urban math collaboratives: As the teacher tells it. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.
22. MacKinnon, A. M., & Grunau, H. (1994). Teacher development through reflection, community, and discourse. In P. P. Grimmett & J. Neufeld (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity (pp. 165-192). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. McDonnell, L., & Elmore, R. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-152.
24. Murnane, R. J., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching to new standards. In S. Fuhrman & J. O'Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 257-293). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. National Writing Project. (1994). National Writing Project 1994 information sheet. Berkeley, CA: Author.
26. Newmann, F. M. (1993). Beyond common sense in education restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 4-13.
27. Office of the President. (1994). CSMP professional development by and for teachers. Oakland: University of California.
28. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Peterson, P. L., McCarthey, S. J., & Elmore, R. F. (1996). Learning from school restructuring. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 119-154.
30. Pollard, A., Broadfoot, P., Croll, P., Osborn, M., & Abbott, D. (1994). Changing English primary schools? The impact of the Education Reform Act at Key Stage One. London: Cassell.
31. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations for the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57, 1-22.
32. St. John, M., Caskey, N., Dickey, K., Heenan, B., Hirabayashi, J., McClaskey, B., Medina, K., Ramage, K., & Tibbitts, F. (1993). An annual update and progress report: Exploring the rationale for state investment. Inverness, CA: Inverness Research Associates.
33. Stecher, B. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (Eds.). Portfolio-driven reform: Vermont teachers' understanding of mathematical problem solving and related changes in classroom practice. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Institute on Education and Training, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.