Optimization of growth medium for the production of α-amylase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens using response surface methodology

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 618-622

  Tanyildizi, M Saban ^a   Elibol, Murat ^b   Özer, Dursun ^a  

^a FIRAT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

amylase; Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Enzyme production; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

ENZYMES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STARCH; STATISTICAL METHODS; YEAST;

AMYLASE; BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGN; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

OPTIMIZATION;

AMYLASE; PEPTONE; STARCH;

ENZYMES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; STARCH; STATISTICAL METHODS; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; CULTURE OPTIMIZATION; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; MACRONUTRIENT; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; STATISTICAL MODEL; YEAST;

BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS;

EID: 33646168064     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1445     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Van der Maarel MJEC, Uitdehaag BV, Joost CM, Leemhuis H and Dijkhuizen L, Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the α-amylase family. Journal of Biotechnology 94:137-155 (2002).
2. Shaw J, Lin F, Chen SC and Chen HC, Purification and properties of an extracellular α-amylase from Thermus sp. Bot Bull Acad Sin 36:195-200 (1995).
3. Silva CJSM and Roberto IC, Optimization of xylitol production by Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037 using response surface methodology. Proc Biochem 36:1119-1124 (2001).
4. Francis F, Sabu A, Nampoothiri KM, Ramachandran S, Ghosh S, Szakacs G and Pandey A, Use of response surface methodology for optimizing process parameters for the production of α-amylase by Aspergillus oryzae. Bioch Eng J 15:107-115 (2003).
5. Chen QH, He GQ and Mokhtar AM, Optimization of medium composition for the production of elastase by Bacillus sp EL31410 with response surface methodology. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 30:667-672 (2002).
6. Sen R and Swaminathan T, Application of response-surface methodology to evaluate the optimum environmental conditions for the enhanced production of surface. Appl Microbial Biotechnology 47:358-363 (1997).
7. Puri S, Beg QK and Gupta R, Optimization of alkaline protease production from Bacillus sp by Response Surface Methodology. Current Microbiology 44:286-290 (2002).
8. Tanyildizi MS, Ozer D and Elibol M, Optimization of α-amylase production by Bacillus sp using response surface methodology. Proc Biochem 40:2291-2296 (2005).
9. Pfueller SL and Elliott WH, The intracellular α-amylase of Bacillus stearothermophilus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 244:48-54 (1969).
10. Vohra A and Satyanarayana T, Statistical optimization of the medium components by response surface methodology to enhance phytase production by Pichia anomala. Proc Biochem 37:999-1004 (2002).
11. Murthy MSRC, Swaminathan T, Rakshit SK and Kosugi Y, Statistical optimization of lipase catalyzed hydrolysis of methyloleate by response surface methodology. Bioprocess Engineering 22:35-39 (2000).
12. Lakshman K, Rastogi NK and Shamala TR, Simultaneous and comparative assessment of parent and mutant strain of Rhizobium meliloti for nutrient limitation and enhanced polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production using optimization studies. Proc Biochem 39:1977-1983 (2004).
13. Elibol M, Optimization of medium composition for actinorhodin production by Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) with response surface methodology. Proc Biochem 39:1057-1062 (2004).
14. Myers RH and Montgomery DC, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 1st edn. Wiley-Interscience: New York (1995).