Sensitivity to effective relational complexity in the occipitoparietal lobe

NeuroImage

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1347-1356

  Phillips, Steven ^a   Niki, Kazuhisa ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Learning; Occipital lobe; Pair recognition; Parietal lobe; Relation; Relational complexity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NERVE NET; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 33646156615     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.039     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahissar M., and Hochstein S. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 10 (2004) 457-464
2. Andrews G., and Halford G.S. A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cogn. Psychol. 45 2 (2002) 153-219
3. Awh E., and Jonides J. Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5 3 (2001) 119-126
4. Brett, M. (1999 May). The MNI brain and the Talairach atlas (http://www.mrccbu.cam.acuk/Imaging).
5. Brett M., Anton J.-L., Valabregue R., and Poline J.-B. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain (2002) (Available on CD-ROM in NeuroImage, Vol. 16, No 2.)
6. Christoff K., Prabhakaran V., Dorfman J., Kroger K.J., Zhao Z., Holyoak K.J., and Gabrieli J.D.E. Rostral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational processing during reasoning. NeuroImage 14 5 (2001) 1136-1149
7. Codd E.F. The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2 (1990), Addison-Wesley
8. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L., Miezin F.M., and Petersen S.E. Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science 270 5237 (1995) 802-805
9. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Turner R., and Frackowiak R.S.J. Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI. NeuroImage 2 (1995) 157-165
10. Gentner D. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 7 (1983) 47-59
11. Goodwin G.P., and Johnson-Laird P.N. Reasoning about relations. Psychol. Rev. 112 2 (2005) 468-493
12. Halford G.S., Wilson W.H., and Phillips S. Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behav. Brain Sci. 21 6 (1998) 803-831
13. Halford G.S., Andrews G., Dalton C., Boag C., and Zielinski T. Young children's performance on the Balance Scale: the influence of relational complexity. Cogn. Psychol. 81 (2002) 417-445
14. Halford G.S., Baker R., McCredden J.E., and Bain J.D. How many variables can humans process?. Psychol. Sci. 16 1 (2005) 70-76
15. Hochstein S., and Ahissar M. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36 (2002) 791-804
16. Hummel J.E., and Holyoak K.J. Distributed representations of structure: a theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychol. Rev. 104 3 (1997) 427-466
17. Hummel J.E., and Holyoak K.J. A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychol. Rev. 110 2 (2003) 220-264
18. Koch G., Oliveri M., Torriero S., Carlesimo G.A., Turriziani P., and Caltagirone C. rTMS evidence of different delay and decision processes in a fronto-parietal neuronal network activated during spatial working memory. NeuroImage 24 1 (2005) 34-39
19. Kroger J.K., Sabb F.W., Fales C.L., Bookheimer S.Y., Cohen M.S., and Holyoak K.J. Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: a parametric study of relational complexity. Cereb. Cortex 12 (2002) 477-485
20. Losier B.J.W., and Klein R.M. A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 (2001) 1-13
21. Marois R., and Ivanoff J. Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 6 (2005) 296-305
22. Nagahama Y., Okada T., Katsumi Y., Hayashi T., Yamauchi H., Sawamoto N., Toma K., Nakamura K., Hanakawa T., Konishi J., Fukuyama H., and Shibasaki H. Transient neural activity in the medial superior frontal gyrus and precuneus time locked with attention shift between object features. NeuroImage 10 2 (1999) 193-199
23. Phillips S., and Niki K. Separating relational from item load effects in paired recognition: temporo-parietal and middle frontal gyral activity with increased associates, but not items during encoding and retention. NeuroImage 17 2 (2002) 1031-1055
24. Phillips S., and Niki K. Increased bilateral occipitoparietal activity for retention of binary versus unary indexed lists in pair recognition. NeuroImage 20 2 (2003) 1226-1235
25. Phillips S., Halford G.S., and Wilson W.H. The processing of associations versus the processing of relations and symbols: a systematic comparison. In: Moore J.D., and Lehman J.F. (Eds). Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1995) 688-691
26. Prabhakaran V., Smith J.A., Desmond J.E., Glover G.H., and Gabrieli J.D. Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: an fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test. Cogn. Psychol. 33 1 (1997) 43-63
27. Prabhakaran V., Narayanan K., Zhao Z., and Gabrieli J.D.E. Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 3 1 (2000) 85-90
28. Sakai K., and Miyashita Y. Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates. Nature 354 (1991) 152-155
29. Shimamura A.P., Jurica P.J., Mangels J.A., Gershberg F.B., and Knight R.T. Susceptibility to memory interference effects following frontal lobe damage: findings from tests of paired-associate learning. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 7 2 (1995) 144-152
30. Smith E.E., and Jonides J. Neuroimaging analysis of human working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 (1998) 12061-12068
31. Statistica, I. (2000). Statistica for Windows (Computer program manual).
32. Talairach J., and Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging (1988), Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, NY
33. Waltz J.A., Knowlton B.J., Holyoak K.J., Boone K.B., Mishkin F.S., Santos M., Thomas C.R., and Miller B.L. A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychol. Sci. 10 2 (2001) 119-125
34. Zahn C.T., and Roskies R.Z. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Trans. Comput. 21 (1972) 269-281