Dominant plane detection from optical flow for robot navigation

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1009-1021

  Ohnishi, Naoya ^a   Imiya, Atsushi ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Affine transformation; Dominant plane detection; Homography; Optical flow

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; CAMERAS; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; OPTICAL FLOWS; ROBOTICS;

AFFINE TRANSFORMATION; DOMINANT PLANE DETECTION; HOMOGRAPHY;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 33646141151     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baker S., and Matthews I. Lucas-Kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework. Internat. J. Comput. Vision 56 (2004) 221-255
2. Barron J.L., Fleet D.J., and Beauchemin S.S. Performance of optical flow techniques. Internat. J. Comput. Vision 12 (1994) 43-77
3. Bouguet, J.-Y., 1999. Pyramidal implementation of the Lucas-Kanade feature tracker description of the algorithm, Intel Corporation, Microprocessor Research Labs, OpenCV Documents.
4. Enkelmann W. Obstacle detection by evaluation of optical flow fields from image sequences. Image Vision Comput. 9 (1991) 160-168
5. Fermin I., and Imiya A. Planar motion detection by randomized triangle matching. Pattern Recognition Lett. 18 (1997) 741-749
6. Fermin I., Imiya A., and Ichikawa A. Randomized polygon search for planar motion detection. Pattern Recognition Lett. 17 (1996) 1109-1115
7. Fraundorfer, F., 2002. A map for mobile robots consisting of a 3D model with augmented salient image features. In: 26th Workshop of the Austrian Association for Pattern Recognition, pp. 249-256.
8. Guilherme N.D., and Avinash C.K. Vision for mobile robot navigation: A survey. IEEE Trans. PAMI 24 (2002) 237-267
9. Haag M., and Nagel H.-H. Beginning a transition from a local to a more global point of view in model-based vehicle tracking. ECCV98 1 (1998) 812-827
10. Hahnel, D., Triebel, R., Burgard, W., Thrun, S., 2003. Map building with mobile robots in dynamic environments. In: Proc. of the IEEE ICRA'03.
11. Hartley A., and Zisserman A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (2000), Cambridge University Press
12. Horn B.K.P., and Schunck B.G. Determining optical flow. Artif. Intell. 17 (1981) 185-203
13. Huang, T.S., Netravali, A.N., 1994. Motion and structure from feature correspondences: A review. In: Proc. of the IEEE 82, pp. 252-268.
14. Kang S.B., and Szeliski R. 3D environment modeling from multiple cylindrical panoramic images. In: Benosman R., and Kang S.B. (Eds). Panoramic Vision: Sensors, Theory, Applications (2001), Springer-Verlag 329-358
15. Lucas, B., Kanade, T., 1981. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In: Proc. of 7th IJCAI, pp. 674-679.
16. Mallot H.A., Bulthoff H.H., Little J.J., and Bohrer S. Inverse perspective mapping simplifies optical flow computation and obstacle detection. Biological Cybernet. 64 (1991) 177-185
17. Marbled-Block sequence: Recorded and first evaluated by Otte and Nagel (KOGS/IAKS, University of Karlsruhe), 1994. Available from: .
18. Nagel, H.-H., 2000. Image sequence evaluation: 30 years and still going strong. In: Proc. of the ICPR'00, pp. 149-158.
19. Rotating Blocks: Otago Optical Flow Evaluation Sequences, 1999. Available from: .
20. Santos-Victor J., and Sandini G. Uncalibrated obstacle detection using normal flow. Machine Vision Appl. 9 (1996) 130-137
21. Wachter S., and Nagel H.-H. Tracking persons in monocular image sequences. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 74 (1999) 174-192