Understanding the Picture User

Advances in Librarianship

Volumn 29, Issue , 2005, Pages 223-245

  Pisciotta, Henry ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646135551     PISSN: 00652830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2830(05)29007-4     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Alice Grant Consulting. Evaluation of digital cultural content: Analysis of evaluation material. Cultural Content Forum (2003). Available at: http://www.culturalcontentforum.org/publications/
2. Art Museum Image Consortium. University Testbed Research Meeting and Results, 3-4 June (1999). http://www.amico.org/univ/univtestbed/u.results.html Available at:
3. Armitage L.H., and Enser P.G.B. Analysis of user need in image archives. Journal of Information Science 23 4 (1997) 287-299
4. Bailey C., and Graham M. Compare and contrast: Measuring the impact of digital imaging on the discipline of art history (2000). Available at: http://www.unites.uqam.ca/AHWA/Meetings/2000.CIHA/
5. Besser H., and Yamashita R. The cost of digital image distribution: The social and economic implications of the production, distribution and usage of image data. School of Information Management and Systems (1998), University of California, Berkeley. Available at: http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Imaging/Databases/1998mellon/ This report was summarized in
6. Besser H. Digital image distribution: A study of costs and uses. D-Lib Magazine 5 10 (1999)
7. Chen H. An analysis of image retrieval tasks in the field of art history. Information Processing and Management 37 (2001) 701-720
8. Choi Y., and Rasmussen E. Searching for images: The analysis of user's queries for image retrieval in american history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 6 (2003) 498-511
9. Condron F., Richards J., Robinson D., and Wise A. Strategies for digital data: Findings and recommendations from digital data in archaeology: a survey of user needs (1999). Available at: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/project/strategies/index.html
10. Conniss L.R., Ashford J.A., and Graham M.E. Information Seeking Behaviour in Image Retrieval: VISOR I Final Report. Institute for Image Data Research, 2000 (2000) (Library and Information Commission Research Report 95).
11. Conniss L.R., Davis J.E., and Graham M.E. A User-Oriented Evaluation Framework for the Development of Electronic Image Retrieval Systems in the Workplace: VISOR II Final Report. Institute for Image Data Research, 2003 (2003) (Library and Information Commission Research Report 144).
12. Covey D.T. Usage and Usability Assessment: Library Practices and Concerns (2001), Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub105abst.html
13. Dalmau M. Reviving DIDO: Using contextual inquiry to inform the redesign of an art image resource. Paper presented at the Digital Library Federation Spring Forum, 20 April, 2004 (2004). Available at: http://www.diglib.org/forums/Spring2004/springforum04abs.htm
14. Digital Library Federation and Outsell Inc. Dimensions and use of the scholarly information environment: Introduction to a data set assembled by the Digital Library Federation and Outsell Inc. (2002), Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.diglib.org/pubs/scholinfo/.
15. Eakins J.P., Briggs P., and Burford B. Image retrieval interfaces: A user's perspective. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3115 (2004) 628-637
16. Enser P. Visual image retrieval: Seeking the alliance of concept-based and content-based paradigms. Journal of Information Science 26 4 (2000) 199-210
17. Farley L. Digital images come of age. Syllabus Magazine (2004). and supporting documentation at the project's Web site: www.cdlib.org/inside/projects/image/#assessment
18. Fidel R. The image retrieval task: Implications for the design and evaluation of image databses. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 3 (1997) 181-199
19. Frost C. The role of mental models in a multi-modal image search. ASIST 2001: Proceedings of the 64th ASIST Annual Meeting 38 (2001) 52-57
20. Gay G., and Rieger R. AMICO University Testbed User Survey (1999). Available at: http://www.amico.org/univ/univtestbed/docs/AMICO_Cornell.pdf
21. Greenstein D., and Thorin S.E. The Digital Library: A Biography (2002), Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub109/contents.html
22. Gustafson K. The impact of technologies on learning. Planning for Higher Education 32 2 (2003-4) 37-43
23. Guthrie K., and Schonfeld R. What Do Faculty Think of Electronic Resources? Findings from the 2003 Academic Research Resources Study, Coalition for Networked Information, Task Force Meeting, Alexandria, Virginia, 16 April 2004 (2004). Available at: http://www.cni.org/tfms/2004a.spring/presentations/CNI_Guthrie_What.ppt
24. Hamma K. The role of museums in online teaching, learning, and research. First Monday 9 5 (2004). Available at: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_5/hamma/index.html
25. Harley D., Henke J., Head A., Miller I., Nasatir D., Sheng X., and Guo J. The Use of Digital Resources in Humanities and Social Science Undergraduate Education: First Year Report (2004), Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley. Available at: http://digitalresourcestudy.berkeley.edu
26. Hastings S.K. Evaluation of image retrieval systems: Role of user feedback. Library Trends 48 2 (1999) 438-452
27. Hill L.L., Dolin R., Frew J., Kemp R.B., Larsgaard M., Montello D.R., Rae M., and Simpson J. User Evaluation: Summary of the Methodologies and Results for the Alexandria Digital Library project (1997), University of California, Santa Barbara. Available at: http://www.asis.org/annual-97/alexia.htm
28. Jansen B., and Pooch U. A review of Web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 3 (2001) 235-246
29. Jörgensen C. Indexing images: Testing an image description template. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 33 (1996) 209-213
30. Jörgensen C. Access to pictorial material: A review of current research and future prospects. Computers and the Humanities 33 4 (1999) 293-318
31. Kiernan K., Rhyne C., and Spronk R. (symposium summary). Digital Imagery for Works of Art: Report of the Co-chairs. Digital Imagery for Works of Art, 19-20 November 2001, Cambridge, MA (2001). Available at: http://www.dli2.nsf.gov/mellon/report.html
32. Kerlin J. FACAC Faculty Survey 2002 (2002), Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Available at: http://tlt.its.psu.edu/surveys/spring2002/faculty2002.html
33. Lavin M.A. Making computers work for the history of art. Art Bulletin 79 2 (1997) 198-201
34. LionShare. Connecting and Extending Peer-to-Peer Networks: LionShare White Paper, October 2004 (2004). Available at: http://lionshare.its.psu.edu/main/info/docspresentation/LionShareWP.pdf
35. Nitecki D.A., and Rando W. Evolving an assessment of the impact on pedagogy, learning and library support of teaching with digital images. In: Hernon P., and Dugan R.E. (Eds). Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education Views and Perspectives (2004), Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO 175-196
36. Oranager S. Image retrieval: Theoretical analysis and empirical user studies on accessing information in images. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 34 (1997) 202-211
37. Pisciotta H. Image delivery and the critical masses. Journal of Library Administration 39 2/3 (2003) 123-138
38. Pisciotta H., Dooris M., Frost J., and Halm M. Penn State's Visual Image User Study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5 1 (2005) 33-58
39. Pitt S., Updike C., and Guthrie M. Integrating digital images into the art and art history curriculum. EDUCAUSE Quarterly 25 2 (2002) 38-44
40. Rasmussen E.M. Indexing images. In: Williams M. (Ed). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 32 (1997) 169-196
41. Salwasser J., and Murray-Rust C. Assessing need for a natural resources digital library. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 33 (2002). Available at: http://www.istl.org/02-winter/article2.html
42. Sandore B. In: Stevenson, and McClung (Eds). Findings of the instructor/student survey (1998) 100-121 1998a
43. Staum-Kuniej S. The IUPUI/IMLS Community Project: Virtual partnerships that build k-life learning communities through technology. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America 20 2 (2001) 7-22
44. Stebley L. Faculty perspectives on teaching with digital images. In: Besser, and Nakashima (Eds). is a part of the unpaged report above by Besser, etc. Whatever approach is used here should resemble the approach with Sandore, 1998 (1998) 1998.
45. Stephenson C. Recent developments in cultural heritage image databases: Directions for user-centered design. Library Trends 48 2 (1999) 410-437
46. In: Stephenson C., and McClung P. (Eds). Delivering Digital Images: Cultural Heritage Resources for Education (1998), Getty Information Institute, Los Angeles
47. In: Stephenson C., and McClung P. (Eds). Images Online: Perspectives on the Museum Educational Site Licensing Project (1998), Getty Information Institute, Los Angeles
48. Tenopir C. Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies (2003), Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC. Available at: www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub120abst.html
49. Turner J.M. Comparing user-assigned terms with indexer-assigned terms for storage and retrieval of moving images: Research results. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 32 (1995) 9-12
50. Veccia S., Springer M., and Lacy M. American Memory User Evaluation, 1991-1993 (1993), Library of Congress, Washington, D.C (ERIC Doc. ED382511).
51. Waibel G. Out of the database, into the classroom: Findings from the Instructional Technology Advisory Group. RLG Focus 67 (2004). Available at: http://www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID=17063#article2
52. Waibel G., and Arcolio A. Out of the Database, Into the Classroom: Final Report from the RLG Instructional Technology Advisory Group (2005). Available at: http://www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID=406
53. Wyngaard S. Introduction. Journal of Library Administration 39 2/3 (2003) 1-4 (to special issue on "Digital Images and Art Libraries")
54. Zhao W., Chellappa R., Phillips P.J., and Rosenfeld A. Face recognition: A literature survey. ACM Computing Surveys 35 4 (2003) 399-459