Recent developments in cultural heritage image databases: Directions for user-centered design

Library Trends

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 410-437

  Stephenson, Christie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033264045     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Armitage, L. H., & Enser, P. G. B. (1997). Analysis of user need in image archives. Journal of Information Science, 23(4), 287-299.
2. Bakewell, E.; Beeman, W. O.; Reese, C. M.;, & Schmitt, M. (1988). Object, image, inquiry: The art historian at work. Santa Monica, CA: Getty Art History Information Program.
3. Benitez, A. B.; Beigi, M.; & Chang, S. F. (1998). Using relevance feedback in content-based image metasearch. IEEE Internet Computing, 2(4), 261-283.
4. Besser, H. (1997a). Comparing five implementations of the Museum Educational Site Licensing Project: If the museum's data's the same, why's it look so different? In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Hypermedia and Interactivity in Museums (pp. 317-325). Pittsburgh, PA: Archives and Museum Informatics.
5. Besser, H. (1997b). Image databases: The first decade, the present, and the future. In P. B. Heidorn & B. Sandore (Eds.), Digital image access and retrieval (Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, March 24-26, 1996, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
6. Besser, H. (1998). MESL implementation at the universities. In C. Stephenson & P. McClung (Eds.), Delivering digital images: Cultural heritage resources for education (pp. 70-84). Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute.
7. Borkowski, E. Y., & Hays, C. (1998). The Maryland Interactive System for Image Searching: Implementing a system for teaching with digital images. In P. McClung & C. Stephenson (Eds.), Images online: Perspectives on the Museum Educational Site Licensing Project (pp. 35-45). Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute.
8. Cawkell, A. E. (1993). Picture-queries and picture databases. Journal of Information Science, 19, 409-423.
9. Collins, K. (1998). Providing subject access to images: A study of user queries. American Archivist, 61 (Spring), 36-55.
10. Dowden, R. (1998). The MESL data dictionary and the data export process. In C. Stephenson & P. McClung (Eds.), Delivering digital images: Cultural heritage resources for education (pp. 50-55). Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute.
11. Enser, P. G. B. (1995). Pictorial information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 51(2), 126-170.
12. Ester, M. (1990). Image quality and viewer perception. In P. Grant-Ryan (Ed.), Digital image-digital cinema (SIGGRAPH '90 art show catalog. Leonardo Supplemental Issue) (pp. 51-63). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
13. Ester, M. (1994). Digital images in the context of visual collections and scholarship. Visual Resources, 10(1), 11-24.
14. Hastings, S. K. (1995). Query categories in a study of intellectual access to digitized art images. In T. Kinney (Ed.), ASIS '95 (Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, October 9-12, 1995, Chicago, IL) (pp. 3-8). Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science.
15. Janney, K., & Sledge, J. (1995). A user model for CIMI Z39.50 application profile. Retrieved November 4, 1999 from the World Wide Web: http://www.cimi.org/documents/ Z3950_app_profile_0995.html.
16. th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, October 21-24, 1996, Baltimore, MD) (pp. 209-213). Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science.
17. Jorgensen, C. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34(2-3), 161-174.
18. Lansdale, M. W.; Scrivener, S. A. R.; & Woodcock, A. (1996). Developing practice with theory in HCI: Applying models of spatial cognition for the design of pictorial databases. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44(6), 777-799.
19. Layne, S. (1994). Some issues in the indexing of images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 583-588.
20. Li, W.-S.; Candan, K. S.; Hirata, K.; & Nara, Y. (1997). SEMCOG: An object-based image retrieval system and its visual query interface. In J. Peckham (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management Data (SIGMOD 1997, May 13-15, 1997, Tucson, AZ) (pp. 521-524). New York: ACM Press.
21. Lindermeier, R., & Stein, C. (1991). User requirement analysis in the museum and art history field for advanced computer system design. Computers and the History of Art, 1(2), 39-53.
22. Marchionini, G.; Plaisant, C.; & Komlodi, A. (1998). Interfaces and tools for the Library of Congress National Digital Library Program. Information Processing & Management 34(4), 535-555.
23. McClung, P. (Ed.). (1995). RLG Digital Image Access Project. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
24. McClung, P., & Stephenson, C. (Eds.). (1998). Images online: Perspectives on the Museum Educational Site Licensing Project. Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute.
25. Mostafa, J. (1994). Digital image representation and access. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (vol. 29, pp. 91-135). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
26. Mostafa, J., & Dillon, A. (1996). Design and evaluation of a user interface supporting multiple image query models. In S. Hardin (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting (vol. 33, pp. 52-57). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
27. Ornager, S. (1997). Image retrieval: Theoretical analysis and empirical user studies. In C. Schwartz (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting (vol. 34, pp. 202-211). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
28. Plaisant, C.; Carr, D.; & Shneiderman, B. (1995). Image-browser taxonomy and guidelines for designers. IEEE Software, 12(2), 21-32.
29. Promey, S. M. (1998). Digital images in the art history classroom: Personal reflections. In P. McClung & C. Stephenson (Eds.), Images online: Perspectives on the Museum Educational Site Licensing Project (pp. 13-22). Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute.
30. Rasmussen, E. M. (1997). Indexing images. In Annual review of information science and technology (vol. 32, pp. 169-196). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
31. Rhyne, C. S. (1996). Computer images for research, teaching, and publications in art history and related disciplines. Visual Resources, 12, 19-51.
32. Rhyne, C. S. (1998). Images as evidence in an history and related disciplines. VRA Bulletin, 25(1), 58-66.
33. Romer, D. (1995). Image and multimedia retrieval. In Research agenda for networked cultural heritage (pp. 49-56). Santa Monica, CA: Getty Information Institute.
34. Sandore, B., & Shaik, N. (1997). The use of an art image database in the classroom: Instructor and student evaluation report (Museum Educational Site Licensing Project). Unpublished report, University of Illinois Library, Digital Imaging Initiative Program.
35. Shneiderman, B. (1997). Designing information-abundant Web sites: Issues and recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(1), 5-29.
36. Sklar, H. (1995). Why make images available online: User perspectives. In P. McClung (Ed.), RLG Digital Image Access Project (pp. 11-18). Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.
37. Stam, D. (1994). Pondering pixeled pictures: Research directions in the digital imaging of art objects. Visual Resources, 10(1), 25-39.
38. Stebley, L. (1998). Faculty perspectives on teaching with digital images. In H. Besser & B. Yamashita (Eds.), The cost of digital image distribution: The social and economic implications of the production, distribution and usage of image data (Report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation). Berkeley: University of California, School of Information Management and Systems.
39. Stephenson, C., & McClung, P. (Eds.). (1998). Delivering digital images: Cultural heritage resources for education. Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute.
40. Tibbo, H. R. (1994). Indexing for the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 607-619.