A model of multi-agent system based on policies and contracts

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3690 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 62-71

  Liao, Beishui ^a   Gao, Ji ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (STANDARDS); CONTRACTS; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DYNAMIC BUSINESS; VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS (VO);

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646129239     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11559221_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Vazquez-Salceda, V.Dignum, and F.Dignum 2005. Organizing Multiagent Systems. JAAMAS, Kluwer. Forthcoming.
2. V. Dignum, et al 2002. Formal Specification of Interaction in Agent Societies. In Proceedings of FAAB 2002, 37-52. Springer-Verlag..
3. Boella and van der Torre 2004. Contracts as legal institutions in organizations of autonomous agents. In Proceedings of AAMAS'04,948-955, IEEE, Inc.
4. F.Dignum 1999.Autonomous Agents with Norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law,Vol7:69-79.
5. G. Tonti, J.M. Bradshaw, et al.Semantic Web Languages for Policy Representation and Reasoning: A Comparison of KAoS, Rei, and Ponder. Proc. Second International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003). October,2003.
6. Beishui Liao, et al. Ontology-Based Conceptual Modeling of Policy-Driven Control Framework: Oriented to Multi-agent System for Web Services Management. In Proceedings of AWCC 2004, 346-356, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
7. Feltovich,et al 2003. Order and KAoS: Using policy to represent agent cultures. In Proceedings of the AAMAS 03 Workshop on Humans and Multi-Agent Systems. Melbourne, Australia.
8. Rao and Georgeff 1991. Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In Proceedings of the KR'91, 473-484. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
9. Fasli 2003a. Interrelations between the BDI primitives: Towards heterogeneous agents. Cognitive Systems Research 4(2003): 1-22.
10. 10.F.Dignum, Kinny and Sonenberg 2001. Motivational Attitudes of Agents: On Desires Obligations and Norms. In Proceedings of the CEEMAS 2001, 61-70. Spring-Verlag.
11. Wright 1951. Deontic logic. Mind, 60:1-15, 1951.
12. Lang, van der Torre and Weydert 2002, Utilitarian Desires. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 5:3, 329-363.
13. Fasli 2003b. From Social Agents to Multi-agent Systems: Preliminary Report. In Proceedings of CEEMAS 2003, 111-121. Spring-Verlag.
14. Dastani, V. Dignum, and F. Dignum 2002, Organizations and Normative Agents. In Proceedings of EurAsia ICT2002, 982-989. Spring-Verlag.
15. Broersen, Dastani, and van der Torre 2003. BDIO-CTL: Obligations and the Specification of Agent Behavior, In Proceedings of IJCAI2003, 1389-1390.
16. Fasli 2002. On Commitments, Roles, and Obligations.In Proceedings of CEEMAS 2001, 93-102. Spring-Verlag.