Reliability demonstration test planning: A three dimensional consideration

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 91, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 882-893

  Yadav, Om Prakash ^a   Singh, Nanua ^b   Goel, Parveen S ^c  

^a North Dakota State University   (United States)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

^c NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Product development; Reliability demonstration; Reliability improvement

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; FAILURE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

CRITICAL ELEMENTS; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA); RELIABILITY DEMONSTRATION; RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT;

RELIABILITY THEORY;

EID: 33646090159     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. O'Conner P. Test for reliability. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19 (2003) 73-84
2. Usher J.S., Alexander S.M., and Thompson J.D. System reliability prediction based on historical data. Qual Reliab Eng Int 6 (1990) 209-218
3. Wang C.J. Sample size determination of bogey tests without failure. Qual Reliab Eng Int 7 (1991) 35-38
4. Wang C.J., and Lu M.-W. A two-stage sampling plan for bogey tests. Qual Reliab Eng Int 8 (1992) 29-35
5. Abernethy R.B. In: Abernethy R.A. (Ed). The new weibull handbook. 3rd ed (1998)
6. Goel PS, Singh N, Kumar P. A mathematical model for design and production verification planning. SAE technical paper series. Paper offer no. 992AM-10; 1999.
7. Porter A. Accelerated reliability qualification in automotive testing. Qual Reliab Eng Int 20 (2004) 115-120
8. Gerling W.H., Preussger A., and Wulfert F.W. Reliability qualification of semiconductor devices based on physics-of-failure and risk and opportunity assessment. Qual Reliab Eng Int 18 (2002) 81-98
9. Jensen F. Component failures based on flaw distribution. Proc Annu Reliab Maint Symp (1989)
10. Mortin D.E., Krolewski J.G., and Cushing M.J. Consideration of component failure mechanisms in the reliability assessment of electronic equipment-addressing the constant failure rate assumption. Proc Annu Reliab Maint Symp (1995)
11. Pecht M., Dasgupta A., Barker D., and Leonard C.T. The reliability physics approach to failure prediction modeling. Qual Reliab Eng Int 6 (1990) 267-273
12. Yadav O.P., Singh N., Chinnam R.B., and Goel P.S. A fuzzy logic based approach to reliability improvement estimation during product development. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 80 (2003) 63-74
13. Yadav O.P., Singh N., and Goel P.S. A practical approach to system reliability growth modeling and improvement. Proc Annu Reliab Maint Symp (2003)
14. Kapur K.C., and Lamberson L.R. Reliability in engineering design (1977), Wiley, New York
15. MIL-STD-1629. Standard procedure for performing a failure modes and effects analysis. http://www.store.mil-standards.com.
16. Soland R.M. Bayesian analysis of the weibull process with unknown scale parameter and its application to acceptance sampling. IEEE Trans Reliab R-17 (1968) 84-90
17. Hoyland A., and Rausand M. System reliability theory: models and statistical methods (1994), Wiley, New York
18. Nelson W. Applied life data analysis (1982), Wiley, New York
19. Martz H.F., and Waller R.A. Bayesian reliability analysis (1982), Wiley, New York