Sex differences in the full and reduced versions of the aggression questionnaire: A question of differential item functioning?

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 92-97

  Condon, Lorena ^a   Morales Vives, Fabia ^a   Ferrando, Pere Joan ^a   Vigil Colet, Andreu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aggression; Differential item functioning; Sex

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646088581     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.92     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andreu, J.M., Peña, M.E., & Graña, J.L. (2002). Adaptación psicométrica de la versión española del cuestionario de agresión [Validation of the Spanish version of the aggression questionnaire]. Psicothema, 14, 476-482.
2. Archer, J. (2001). A strategic approach to aggression. Social Development. 10, 267-271.
3. Archer, J. (2004). Which attitudinal measures predict trait aggression? Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 47-60.
4. Archer, J., Kilpatrick, G., & Bramwell, R. (1995). Comparison of two aggression inventories. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 371-380.
5. Bentler, P.M (1995). EQS for Windows user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
6. Bernstein, I.H., & Gesn, P.R. (1997). On the dimensionality of the Buss/Perry aggression questionnaire. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 35, 563-568.
7. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258.
8. Bryant, F.B., & Smith, B.D. (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire. Journal of Research on Personality, 35, 138-167.
9. Bushman, B.J., & Anderson, C.A. (1998). Methodology in the study of aggression: Integrating experimental and nonexperimental findings. In R.G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 23-48). New York: Academic Press.
10. Buss, A.H., & Perry, M.P. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
11. Buss, A.H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343-349.
12. Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Campbell A. (1999) Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203-252.
14. Carlo, G., Raffaelli, M., Laible, D.J., & Meyer K.A. (1999). Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? Personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression. Sex Roles, 40, 711-729.
15. Clauser, B.E., & Mazor, K.M. (1998). Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(1), 31-44.
16. Ferrando, P.J. (1996). Calibration of invariant item parameters in a continuous item response model using the extended LISREL measurement submodel. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 31 419-439.
17. Garcia-León, A., Reyes, G.A., Vila, J., Pérez, N., Robles, H., & Ramos, M.M. (2002). The aggression questionnaire: A validation study in student samples. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 5, 45-53.
18. Gladue, B.A. (1991). Qualitative and quantitative sex differences in self-reported aggressive behavioral characteristics. Psychological Reports, 68, 675-684.
19. Harris, J. A. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the aggression questionnaire. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 8, 991-993.
20. Hummel, T.J., & Sligo, J. (1971). An empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 76(1), 49-57.
21. Knight, G.P., Guthrie, I.K., Page, M.C., & Fabes, R.A. (2002). Emotional arousal and sex differences in aggression: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 366-393.
22. Lorenzo-Seva, U., Kiers, H.A.L., & Ten Berge, J.M.F. (2002). Techniques for oblique factor rotation of two or more loading matrices to a mixture of simple structure and optimal agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55, 337-360.
23. Meesters, C., Muris, P., Bosma, H., Schouten, E., & Beuving, S. (1996). Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the aggression questionnaire. Behavioral Research Therapy, 34, 839-843.
24. Mellenbergh, G.J. (1994). A unidimensional latent trait model for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 29, 223-227.
25. Morales-Vives, F., Codorniu-Raga, M.J., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2005). Psychometric properties of the reduced versions of Buss and Perry's aggression questionnaire. Psicothema, 77(1), 96-100.
26. Muthen, L.K., & Muthen, B.O. (1998). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthen and Muthen.
27. Nakano, K. (2001) Psychometric evaluation on the Japanese adaptation of the aggression questionnaire. Behavioral Research Therapy, 39, 853-858.
28. Ostrov, J.M., & Keating, C.F. (2004). Sex differences in preschool aggression during free play and structured interactions: An observational study. Social Development, 13, 255-277.
29. Ramirez, J., Andreu, J.M., & Fujihara, T. (2001). Cultural and sex differences in aggression: A comparison between Japanese and Spanish students using two different inventories. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 313-322.
30. Rodríguez, J.M., Peña, E., & Graña, J.L. (2002). Adaptación psicométrica de la versión española del cuestionario de agresión [Validation of the Spanish version of the aggression questionnaire]. Psicothema, 14, 476-482.
31. Salmivalli, C., & Kaukiainen, A. (2004). "Female aggression" revisited: Variable- and person-centered approaches to studying sex differences in different types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 158-163.
32. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do sex and type of aggression matter? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 17-24.
33. Shevlin, M., Bailey, F., & Adamson, A. (2002). Examining the factor structure and sources of differential functioning of the Eysenck personality questionnaire revised - abbreviated. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 479-487.
34. Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 173-180.
35. Steiger, J.H., & Lind, J.C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
36. Tapper, K., & Boulton, M.J. (2004). Sex differences in levels of physical, verbal, and indirect aggression among primary school children and their associations with beliefs about aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 123-145.
37. Tremblay, P.F., & Ewart, L.A. (in press). The Buss and Perry aggression questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies. Personality and Individual Differences.
38. Underwood, M.K., Galen, B.R., & Paquette, J.A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding sex and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248-266.
39. Vigil-Colet, A., & Codorniu-Raga, M.J. (2004) Aggression and inhibition deficits: The role of functional and dysfunctional impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1431-1440.
40. Vigil-Colet, A., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Codorniu-Raga, M.J., & Morales, F. (2005). Factor structure of the aggression questionnaire among different samples and languages. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 601-608.
41. Williams, T.Y., Boyd, J.C., Cascardi, M.A., & Poythress, N. (1996). Factor structure and convergent validity of the aggression questionnaire in an offender population. Psychological Assessment, 4, 398-403.
42. Zeichner, A., Parrott, D.J., & Frey, F.C. (2003). Sex differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 35-106.
43. Zumbo, B.D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.