Internal review and administrative justice: Some evidence and research questions from homelessness decision-making

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 473-490

  Halliday, Simon ^a  

^a WOLFSON COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Administrative justice; Administrative law; Homelessness; Internal review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937344940     PISSN: 09649069     EISSN: 14699621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09649060110079378     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adler, M. (2001) A Socio-legal Approach to Procedural Justice, seminar paper presented to the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford University, February, 2001.
2. Adler, M. and Henman, P. (2001) ‘e-Justice: A Comparative Study of Computerization and Procedural Justice in Social Security’ International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 15(2) 195-212.
3. Atkinson, R., Buck, T., Pollard, D. and Smith, N. (1999) A Regional Study of Local Authority and Court Processes in Homelessness Cases, London: Lord Chancellor’s Department.
4. Baldwin, J., Wikeley, N. and Young, R. (1992) Judging Social Security, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Berthoud, R. and Bryson, A. (1997) ‘Social security appeals: what do the claimants want?’, Journal of Social Security Law 4: 17-41.
6. Birkinshaw, P. (2001) ‘Internal complaints and grievance procedures’, in M. Partington (ed.) The Leggatt Review of Tribunals: Academic Seminar Papers. Working Paper Series No. 3, Bristol: Faculty of Law, University of Bristol.
7. Cowan, D. (1997) Homelessness, Aldershot: Ashgate/Dartmouth.
8. Cowan, D. and Fionda, J. (1998) ‘Homelessness internal appeals mechanisms’, Anglo-American Law Review Parts 1 and 2, 66-86; 169-87.
9. Cowan, D. and Hunter, C. (1998) Homelessness Internal Reviews: a View from the Sharp End, Unpublished Paper for European Network for Housing Research Unpublished Conference, Cardiff, September 1998.
10. Dalley, G. and Berthoud R. (1992) Challenging Discretion: The Social Fund Review Procedure, London: Policy Studies Institute.
11. Duguid, G. (1990) Homelessness in Scotland: a Study of Policy and Practice, Edinburgh: CRU, Scottish Office.
12. Edelman, L. (1990) ‘Legal environments and organizational governance: the expansion of due process in the American workplace’, American Journal of Sociology 95(6): 1401-40.
13. Evans, R., Smith, N., Bryson, C. and Austin, N. (1994) The Operation of the 1991 Code of Guidance on Homelessness in Scotland, Edinburgh: CRU, Scottish Office.
14. Genn, H. (1994) ‘Tribunal review of administrative decision-making’, in G. Richardson and H. Genn (eds) Administrative Law and Government Action, Oxford: Clarendon.
15. Genn H. and Genn Y. (1989) The Effectiveness of Representations at Tribunals, London: Lord Chancellor’s Department.
16. Halliday, S. (1999) Judicial Review and Administrative Justice, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, unpublished PhD. thesis.
17. Halliday, S. (2000) ‘The influence of judicial review on bureaucratic decision-making’, Public Law, Spring: 110-22.
18. Huby, M. and Dix, G. (1992) Evaluating the Social Fund, London: DSS/ HMSO.
19. Ison, T. G. (1999) ‘Administrative justice: is it such a good idea?’, in M. Harris and M. Partington (eds) Administrative Justice in the 21st Century, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
20. Lewis, N. and Birkinshaw, P. (1993) When Citizens Complain: Reforming Justice and Administration, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
21. Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-level Bureaucracy, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Lloyd-Bostock, S. and Mulcahy, L. (1994) ‘The social psychology of making and responding to hospital complaints: an account model of complaint processes’, Law and Policy: 123-47.
23. Loveland, I. (1995) Housing Homeless Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
24. Mulcahy, L. (1999) ‘Sliding scales of justice at the end of the century - a cause for complaints?’, in M. Harris and M. Partington (eds) Administrative Justice in the 21st Century, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
25. Partington, M. (1999) ‘Restructuring administrative justice? The redress of citizens’ grievances’, Current Legal Problems 52: 173-99.
26. Rawlings, R. (1986) The Complaints Industry: A Review of Socio-Legal Research on Aspects of Administrative Justice, London: ESRC.
27. Sainsbury, R. (1994) ‘Internal reviews and the weakening of social security claimants’ rights of appeal’, in G. Richardson and H. Genn (eds.) Administrative Law and Government Action, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28. Sainsbury, R. and Eardley, T. (1991) Housing Benefit Reviews, London: HMSO.
29. Scott, C. (2000) ‘Accountability in the regulatory state’ Journal of Law & Society 27(1): 38-60.
30. Scott, S., Currie, H., Fitzpatrick, S., Keoghan, M., Kintrea, K., Parson, H. and Tate, J. (2001) Good Practice in Housing Management: Review of Progress, Edinburgh: CRU, Scottish Executive.
31. Scottish Executive (2000) Statistical Bulletin Housing Series: HSG/2000/5 Housing Trends in Scotland, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/stats/bulletins/ 00000-00.asp
32. Scottish Office (1991) Homelessness: Part II of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987, Edinburgh: Scottish Office.
33. Scottish Office (1997) Code of Guidance on Homelessness, Edinburgh: Scottish Office.
34. Wallace, H. and Mulcahy, L. (1999) Cause for Complaint: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the NHS Complaints Procedure, London: Public Law Project.