Risk communication in cancer genetics: Impact on lay beliefs and health behaviour;Communication des risques en oncogénétique: Impact sur les croyances et comportements de santé

Revue Francophone de Psycho-Oncologie

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 9-13

  Julian Reynier, C ^a  

^a INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Cancer; Genetic counselling; Genetic testing; Psychology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GENETICS; CANCER PREVENTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FOLLOW UP; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INDUSTRIALIZATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LONG TERM CARE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33646067456     PISSN: 17604133     EISSN: 17652863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10332-006-0109-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Braithwaite D, Emery J, Walter F, et al. (2004). Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(2): 122-133
2. Broadstock M, Michie S, Marteau T (2000). Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: A systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet 8(10): 731-738
3. Croyle RT, Smith KR, Botkin JR, et al. (1997). Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: Preliminary findings. Health Psychology 16(1): 63-72
4. Epplein M, Koon K, Ramsey S, et al. (2005). Genetic services for familial cancer patients: A follow up survey of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers. J Clin Oncol 23: 4713-4718
5. Green MJ, Biesecker BB, McInerney AM, et al. (2001). An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet 103(1): 16-23
6. Halbert C, Koon K, Ramsey S, et al. (2004). Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for Hereditary Non Polyposis Colon Cancer (HNPCC) mutations. Arch Intern Med 164: 1881-1887
7. Hopwood P (2005). Psychosocial aspects of risk communication and mutation testing in familial breast-ovarian cancer. Current Opinion in Oncology 17: 340-344
8. Huiart L, Eisinger F, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, et al. (2002). Effects of genetic consultation on perception of a family risk of breast/ovarian cancer and determinants of inaccurate perception after the consultation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55: 665-75
9. Julian-Reynier C, Cristini C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, et al. (2003). Psychological impact of BRCA+/- genetic results: 8 month follow up of the French national cohort of unaffected women, 8th International meeting on Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics. Barcelona
10. Julian-Reynier C, Welkenhuysen M, Hagoel L, et al. (2003). Risk communication strategies: State of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic services. Eur J Hum Genet 11(10): 725-736
11. Julian-Reynier CM, Bouchard LJ, Evans DG, et al. (2001). Women's attitudes toward preventive strategies for hereditary breast or ovarian carcinoma differ from one country to another: Differences among English, French, and Canadian women. Cancer 92(4): 959-968
12. Kessler S (2000). Psyche and helix: Psychological aspects of genetic counseling New York: Wiley
13. Lerman C, Narod S, Schulman K, et al. (1996). BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 275(24): 1885-1903
14. Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf JL, et al. (1997). Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(2): 148-157
15. Lerman C, Hughes C, Croyle RT, et al. (2000). Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing. Prev Med 31(1): 75-80
16. Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al. (2001). Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet 98(1): 15-24
17. Lodder LN, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al. (2002). One year follow-up of women opting for presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: Emotional impact of the test outcome and decisions on risk management (surveillance or prophylactic surgery). Breast Cancer Res Treat 73(2): 97-112
18. Mancini J, Noguès C, Adenis C, et al. ((in press)). Impact on informed decision-making, satisfaction and knowledge of an information booklet about BRCA genetic testing. Eur J Can
19. Meijers-Heijboer E, Verhoog L, Brekelmans C, et al. (2000). Presymptomatic DNA testing and prophylactic surgery in families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The Lancet 355: 2015-2020
20. Meiser B, Halliday JL (2002). What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Social Science & Medicine 54: 1463-1470
21. Peshkin BN, DeMarco TA, Brogan BM, et al. (2001). Brca1/2 testing: complex themes in result interpretation. J Clin Oncol 19(9): 2555-2565
22. Schwartz MD, Peshkin BN, Hughes C, et al. (2002). Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample. J Clin Oncol 20(2): 514-520
23. van Dijk S, Otten W, Timmermans M, et al. (2005). What's the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer. Genet Med 7(4): 239-245
24. van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Lodder L, et al. (2003). Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: A 5 year follow up study. J Clin Oncol 21: 3867-3874
25. Watson M, Foster C, Eeles R, et al. (2004). Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort. British Journal of Cancer 91: 1787-1794
26. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG (2002). Risk charts: Putting cancer in context. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(11): 799-804