Assessment of test data for selection of 3-D failure criterion for sand

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 307-333

  Lade, Poul V ^a  

^a The Catholic University of America ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cross anisotropy; Failure criterion; Sand; Shear banding; Shear strength; True triaxial tests

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESSES;

CROSS-ANISOTROPY; SAND FAILURE; SAND STRENGTH; SHEAR BANDING; TRUE TRIAXIAL TESTS;

SAND;

ANISOTROPY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); SAND; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESSES;

FAILURE ANALYSIS; SAND; SHEAR BAND; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS ANALYSIS; TRIAXIAL TEST;

EID: 33646066842     PISSN: 03639061     EISSN: 10969853     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nag.471     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Ko H-Y, Scott RF. A new soil testing apparatus. Geotechnique 1967; 17(1):40-57.
2. Shibata T, Karube D. Influence of the variation of the intermediate principal stress on the mechanical properties of normally consolidates clays. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Soil, Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. I, 1965; 359-362.
3. Green GE, Bishop AW. A note on the drained strength of sand under generalized strain conditions. Géotechnique 1969; 19(1):144-149.
4. Green GE. Strength and deformation of sand measured in an independent stress control cell. Stress-Strain Behaviour of Soils, Proceedings of the Roscoe Memorial Symposium, Cambridge, G.T. Foulis, Henley-on-Thames, 1971; 285-323.
5. Lade PV, Duncan JM. Cubical triaxial tests on cohesionless soil. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division (ASCE) 1973; 99(SM10):793-812.
6. Lade PV. Cubical triaxial apparatus for soil testing. Geotechnical Testing Journal GTJODJ 1978; 1(2):93-101.
7. Hambly EC. A new true triaxial apparatus. Géotechnique 1969; 19(2):307-309.
8. Pearce JA. A new true triaxial apparatus. Stress-Strain Behaviour of Soils, Proceedings of the Roscoe Memorial Symposium, Cambridge, G.T. Foulis, Henley-on-Thames, 1971; 330-339.
9. Saada AS, Townsend FC. State of the art: laboratory strength testing of soils. In Laboratory Shear Strength of Soils, ASTM STP 740, Yong RN, Townsend FC (eds). American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, 1981;7-77.
10. Arthur JRF. Cubical devices: versatility and constraints. In Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977, Donaghe RT, Chaney RC, Silver ML (eds). American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, 1988; 743-765.
11. Saada AS. Hollow cylinder torsional devices: their advantages an limitations. In Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977, Donaghe RT, Chaney RC, Silver ML (eds). American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, 1998; 743-765.
12. Sayao ASF, Vaid YP. A critical assessment of stress nonuniformities in hollow cylinder torsional specimens. Soils and Foundations 1991; 31(1):60-72.
13. Arthur JRF, Dunstan T, Al-Ani QAJL, Assadi A. Plastic deformation and failure in granular media. Geotechnique 1977; 27(1):53-74.
14. Ko H-Y, Scott RF. Deformation of sand at failure. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division (ASCE) 1968; 94(SM4):883-898.
15. Ochiai H, Lade PV. Three-dimensional behavior of sand with anisotropic fabric. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE) 1983; 109(10):1313-1328.
16. Yamada Y, Ishihara K. Anisotropic deformation characteristics of sand under three dimensional stress conditions. Soils and Foundations 1979; 19(2):79-94.
17. Ergun MU. Evaluation of three-dimensional shear testing. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 4, 1981; 593-596.
18. Green GE, Reades AW. Boundary conditions, anisotropy, and sample shape effect on the stress-strain behavior of sand in triaxial compression and plane strain. Géotechnique 1975; 25(2):333-356.
19. Procter DC, Barden L. Correspondence on green and Bishop: a note on the drained strength of sand under generalized strain conditions. Géotechnique 1969; 19(3):424-426.
20. Reades DW. Stress-strain characteristics of a sand under three-dimensional loading. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1972.
21. Kirkpatrick WM. The condition of failure for sands. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, 1957; 172-178.
22. Matsuoka H, Nakai T. Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under different principal stresses. Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers 1974; 232:59-70.
23. Ramamurthy T, Rawat PC. Shear strength of sand under general stress system. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1.2, 1973; 339-342.
24. Sutherland HB, Mesdary MS. The influence of the intermediate principal stress on the strength of sand. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, 1969; 391-399.
25. Kjellman W. Report on an apparatus for consummate investigation of the mechanical properties of soils. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 2, 1936; 16-20.
26. Habib P. Influence de la variation de la contrainte principale moyenne sur la resistance au cisaillement des sols. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, 1953; 131-136.
27. Haythornthwaite RM. Mechanics of the triaxial test for soils. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division (ASCE) 1960; 86(SM5):35-62
28. Wu TH, Loh AK, Malvern LE. Study of failure envelope of soils. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division (ASCE) 1963; 89(1):145-181.
29. Lomize GM, Kryzhanovsky AL. On the strength of sand. Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference, vol. 1, Oslo, 1967; 215-219.
30. Procter DC, Barden L. The drained strength of granular material. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1971; 8:372-383.
31. Goldscheider M, Gudehus G. Rectilinear extension of dry sand - testing apparatus and experimental results. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, 1973; 143-149.
32. Goldscheider M. Grenzbedingung und fliessregel von sand. Mechanics Research Communications 1976; 3:463-468.
33. Matsuoka H, Ishizaki H. Deformation and strength of anisotropic soil. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, Stockholm, 1981; 699-702.
34. 2 on strength and deformation characteristics of sand. Soils and Foundations 1988; 28(1):89-106.
35. Mochizuki A, Mikasa M. Takahashi S. A new independent principal stress control apparatus. In Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 977, Donaghe RT, Chaney RC, Silver ML (eds). American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, 1988; 844-858.
36. Shapiro S, Yamamuro, JA. Effects of silt in three-dimensional stress-strain behavior of loose sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(1):1-11.
37. Wang Q, Lade PV. Shear banding in true triaxial tests and its effect on failure in sand. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2001; 127(8):754-761.
38. Rudnicki JW, Rice JR. Conditions for the localization of deformation in pressure-sensitive dilatant materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1975; 23:371-394.
39. Lade PV, Wang Q. Analysis of shear banding in true triaxial tests on sand. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2001; 127(8):762-768.
40. Lade PV, Kim MK. Single hardening constitutive model for frictial materials, II: yield criterion and plastic work contours. Computers and Geotechnics 1988; 6:13-29.
41. Lade PV. Analysis and prediction of shear banding under 3D conditions in granular materials. Soils and Foundations 2003; 43(4):161-172.
42. Lade PV. Elasto-plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil with curved yield surfaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1977; 13:1019-1035.
43. Lade PV, Wang Q. Effects of slenderness ratio on shear banding in true triaxial tests on sand. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics 2002; 149-154.
44. Thornton C. Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Géotechnique 2000; 50(1):43-53.
45. Muhlhaus H-B, Vardoulakis I. The thickness of shear bands in granular materials. Géotechnique 1987; 51(9): 753-765.
46. Abelev AV, Lade PV. Effects of cross-anisotropy on three-dimensional behavior of sand. Part I: stress-strain behavior and shear banding. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2003; 129(2):160-166.
47. Lade PV, Abelev AV. Effects of cross-anisotropy on three-dimensional behavior of sand. Part II: volume change behavior and failure. ASCE 2003; 129(2):167-174.
48. Abelev AV, Lade PV. Characterization of failure in cross-anisotropic soils. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2003; 130(5):599-606.
49. Yamamuro JA, Lade PV. Strain localization in extension tests on granular materials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1995; 121(7):828-836.
50. Roscoe KH, Schofield AN, Thurairajah A. An evaluation of test data for selecting a yield criterion for soils. Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils, STP No. 3. ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, 1963.
51. Lade PV. The stress-strain and strength characteristics of cohesionless soil. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1972.
52. Wu W, Kolymbas D. On some issues in triaxial extension tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal 1991; 14(3):276-287.
53. Lade PV, Yamamuro JA, Skyers BD. Effects of shear band formation in triaxial extension tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal ASTM 1996; 19(4):398-410.
54. Yamamuro JA, Lade PV. Drained sand behavior in axisymmetric tests at high pressures. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE) 1996; 122(2):109-119.
55. Matsuoka H. On the significance of the spatial mobilized plane. Soils and Foundations 1976; 16(1):91-100.
56. Lade PV, Ghaboussi J, Inel S, Yamamuro JA. Experimental determination of constitutive behavior of soils. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Association of Computer Methods for Advances in Geomechanics 1994; 215-222.