Governmental oversight of discharges from concentrated animal feeding operations

Environmental Management

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 745-752

  Centner, Terence J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Concentrated animal feeding operations; Discharge; Manure; Nutrient management; Regulation; Water quality

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; STORMS; SURFACE WATERS;

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; PATHOGENS; POLLUTANTS;

WATER POLLUTION;

STORM WATER; SURFACE WATER;

MANURE; NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; PATHOGEN; POLLUTANT SOURCE; POLLUTION POLICY; STORMWATER;

AGRICULTURAL WASTE; ANIMAL FOOD; GOVERNMENT; LAW; MANURE; POLLUTION CONTROL; REVIEW; STANDARD; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; MANURE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33646052882     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0130-5     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Araji, A. A., Z. O. Abdo, and P. Joyce. 2001. Efficient use of animal manure on cropland: economic analysis. Bioresource Technology 79:179-191.
2. Beegle, D. B., O. T. Carton, and J. S. Baily. 2000. Nutrient management planning: justification, theory, practice. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:72-79.
3. Brief for the American Farm Bureau Federation and others 2003. For consideration in Waterkeeper Alliance v. Environmental Protection Agency, case no. 03-4470(L), Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
4. Brief for the Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. For consideration in Waterkeeper Alliance v. Environmental Protection Agency, case no. 03-4470(L), Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
5. Brief for Waterkeeper Alliance and others. 2003. For consideration in Waterkeeper Alliance v. Environmental Protection Agency, case no. 03-4470(L), Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
6. Centner, T. J. 2001. Evolving policies to regulate pollution from animal feeding operations. Environmental Management 28:599-609.
7. Centner, T. J. 2004a. Enforcing environmental regulations: concentrated animal feeding operations. Missouri Law Review 69:697-730.
8. Centner, T. J. 2004b. New regulations to minimize water impairment from animals rely on management practices. Environment International 30:539-545.
9. CFR (Code of Federal Regulations). 2004. Title 40, parts 122 and 412.
10. Chittenden, J. A. 2003. State helps farmers meet water quality objectives. New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany, N.Y., January 6. Report available at http://www.agmkt.state.ny.us/AD/release.asp?ReleaseID= 1270.
11. Cole, D., L. Todd, and S. Wing. 2000. Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects. Environmental Health Perspectives 108:685-699.
12. De, S., R. W. Kloot, E. Covington, A. Bezuglov, and H. Taduri. 2004. AFOPro: a nutrient management decision support system for the United States. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 43:69-76.
13. Environmental Defense Center, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Federal Reporter Third 344:832-881 (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals).
14. Environmental Law Institute. 1999. Locating livestock: how water pollution control efforts can use information from state regulatory programs. Washington, D.C., June.
15. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. State compendium: programs and regulatory activities related to animal feeding operations. Office of Wastewater Management, Washington, D.C., March.
16. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. 2000 National water quality inventory. Office of Water, Washington, D.C., Chapters 2 (p 14) and 3 (p 22). Report available at http://www.epa.gov/305b/2000report.
17. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations. Federal Register 68:7176-7274.
18. Fleming, R. A., and J. D. Long. 2002. Animal waste management: measuring the cost of restricting access to cropland for manure nutrient management. Agronomy Journal 94:57-64.
19. Georgia Compilation Rules and Regulations. 2005. Rule 391-3-6-.21.
20. Gollehon, N., Caswell, M., Ribaudo, M., Kellogg, R., Lander, C., and Letson, D. 2001. Confined animal production and manure nutrients. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 771, Washington, D.C.
21. Harter, T., H. Davis, M. C. Matthews, and R. D. Meyer. 2002. Shallow groundwater quality on dairy farms with irrigated forage crops. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 55:287-315.
22. Heathwaite, L., A. Sharpley, and W. Gburek. 2000. A conceptual approach for integrating phosphorus and nitrogen management at watershed scales. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:158-166.
23. Letson, D., N. Gollehon, N. Breneman, C. Kascak, and C. Mose. 1998. Confined animal production and groundwater protection. Review of Agricultural Economics 20:348-364.
24. Lory, J. A., and others. 2004. Feasibility and costs of phosphorus application limits on 39 U.S. swine operations. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:1114-1123.
25. Mallin, A., and L. B. Cahoon. 2003. Industrialized animal production - a major source of nutrient and microbial pollution to aquatic ecosystems. Population and Environment 24:369-385.
26. Martin, J. H. 1997. Implications of CARE vs. Southview Farm on the US livestock and poultry industry. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:741-746.
27. Metcalfe, M. 2000. State legislation regulating animal manure management. Review of Agricultural Economics 22:519-532.
28. Mullen, J. D., and T. J. Centner. 2004. Impacts of adjusting environmental regulations when enforcement authority is diffuse: confined animal feeding operations and environmental quality. Review of Agricultural Economics 25:209-219.
29. Natural Resources Defense Council. 1998. America's animal factories: how states fail to prevent pollution from livestock waste. New York. Report available at http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/factor/aafinx.asp.
30. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Reilly. 1992. Case no. 89-2980 (Federal District Court, District of Columbia).
31. New York Department of Environmental Conservation. 2004. State pollutant discharge elimination system (SPDES) General permit no. GP-04-02, Albany, New York. Report available at http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dow/gp0402permit.pdf
32. Parker, D. 2000. Controlling agricultural nonpoint water pollution: Costs of implementing the Maryland Water Quality Improvement Act of 1998. Agricultural Economics 24:23-31.
33. Parry, R. 1998. Agricultural phosphorus and water quality: a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency perspective. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:258-261.
34. Ribaudo, M. O., Horan, R. D., and Smith, M. E. 1999. Economics of water quality protection from nonpoint sources: theory and practice. Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Agriculture information bulletin no. 782.
35. Schiffman, S. S. 2000. Potential health effects of odor from animal operations, wastewater treatment, and recycling of byproducts. Journal of Agromedicine 7:7-82.
36. Schmidt, C. W. 2000. Lessons from the flood: will Floyd change livestock farming? Environmental Health Perspectives 108:A74-A77.
37. Sharpley, A. 1999. Agricultural phosphorus, water quality, and poultry production: are they compatible? Journal of Poultry Science 78:660-673.
38. Sharpley, A., B. Foy, and P. Withers. 2000. Practical and innovative measures for the control of agricultural phosphorus losses to water: an overview. Journal of Environmental Quality 29:1-9.
39. U.S. Code. 2000. Title 33, sections 1311, 1314, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1342, 1361, 1362, and 1365.
40. Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Federal Reporter Third 399:486-524 (Second Circuit Court of Appeals).