New regulations to minimize water impairment from animals rely on management practices

Environment International

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 539-545

  Centner, Terence J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal manure; Concentrated animal feeding operation; Discharge; Management practice; Regulation; Water quality

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION; COSTS; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); EFFLUENTS; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; STORMS;

STORM WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

WATER POLLUTION;

STORM WATER;

LIVESTOCK FARMING; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MANURE; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL WASTE; AGRICULTURAL WORKER; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EFFLUENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; LAW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 1542411442     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anonymous Dairy farmers having success piping animal waste to lagoons Water Engineering and Management 147 2000 8 [August]
2. Centner T.J. Establishing a rational basis for regulating animal feeding operations: a view of the evidence Vermont Law Review 27 2 2002 145-171
3. Centner T.J. Legal structures governing animal waste management National Center for Manure and Animal Waste Management White Papers 2002 North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC Chapter 15
4. Centner T.J. Regulating concentrated animal feeding operations to enhance the environment Environmental Science and Policy 6 2003 433-440
5. Fleming R.A. The economic impact of setback requirements on land application of manure Land Economics 75 2000 579-591
6. Fleming R.A. Long J.D. Animal waste management: measuring the cost of restricting access to cropland for manure nutrient management Agronomy Journal 94 2002 57-64
7. Innes R. The economics of livestock waste and its regulation American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 2000 97-117
8. Keplinger K.O. DeBose B. Costs and environmental effectiveness for nutrient BMPs 1998 Tarleton State University Stephenville, TX
9. Koelsch R. Lesoing G. Nutrient balance on Nebraska livestock confinement systems Journal of Animal Science 77 1999 63-71 [Supp.]
10. Lasiter D. 2003 Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Indianapolis, IN, telephone interview, May 12.
11. Letson D. Gollehon N. Breneman V. Kascak K. Mose C. Confined animal production and groundwater protection Review of Agricultural Economics 20 2 1998 348-364
12. Lopez P. Minnesota's shortfall; budget cuts; ssing shifts and cuts, Pawlenty rebalances his budget proposal Star Tribune 2003 1B [Minneapolis, MN, Mar. 13]
13. Matisziw T.C. Hipple J.D. Spatial clustering and state/county legislation: the case of hog production in Missouri Regional Studies 35 8 2001 719-730
14. Metcalfe M. State legislation regulating animal manure management Review of Agricultural Economics 22 2 2000 519-532
15. Osborne L.L. Kovacic D.A. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management Freshwater Biology 29 1993 243-258
16. Osei E. Gassman P.W. Hauck L.M. Jones R. Beran L. Dyke P.T. et al. Environmental benefits and economic costs of manure incorporation on dairy waste application fields Journal of Environmental Management 68 1 2003 1-11
17. Parker D. Controlling agricultural nonpoint water pollution: costs of implementing the Maryland Water Quality Improvement Act of 1998 Agricultural Economics 24 1998 23-31
18. Pease J. Bosch D. Alternative performance standards for concentrated animal feeding operations: a brief overview Paper presented at the SERA-IEG 30: Natural Resource Economics Meetings, Lexington, Kentucky, May 2003 2003 http://www.ca.uky.edu/sera-ieg/pubs.html (accessed October 2003)
19. Schmidt C.W. Lessons from the flood: will Floyd change livestock farming Environmental Health Perspectives 180 2 2000 A74-A77
20. Second Circuit Court of Appeals Concerned area residents for the environment versus Southview Farms Federal Reporter 2d 34 1994 114-121
21. Sharpley A. Agricultural phosphorus, water quality, and poultry production: are they compatible? Poultry Science 78 1999 660-673
22. Thu K.M. Public health concerns for neighbors of large-scale swine production operations Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 8 2002 175-184
23. Timberg C. Shear M.D. Falling tax revenue trips budget alarms; area braces for economic domino effect Washington Post, June 27, 2002 2003 A01
24. US Code, 2000. Title 30, section 1362(14).
25. USDA Comprehensive nutrient management planning technical guidance. Washington, DC, 2000, (http://www.esri.sc.edu/Projects/usda/ CNMPLiterature/NRCS_Nat_Doc/CNMP_Tech_Guide.pdf (accessed October 2003)).
26. USDA and EPA. Unified national strategy for animal feeding operations. Washington, DC, 1999 (http://cfpub2.epa.gov/npdes/afo/ustrategy.cfm? program_id=7 (accessed October 2003)).
27. US EPA Compliance assurance implementation plan for concentrated animal feeding operations 1998 Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Washington, DC http://www.epa.gov/Compliance/resources/ policies/civil/cwa/cafostrat.pdf (accessed October 2003)
28. US EPA Draft guidance manual and example NPDES permit for concentrated animal feeding operations, final internal draft 2000 Office of Wastewater Management Washington, DC http://www.gwpc.org/news/nws-CAFOs.htm (accessed May 2003)
29. US EPA National water quality inventory: 1998 report to Congress 2000 Office of Water Washington, DC (accessed October 2003) http://www.epa.gov/305b/98report/
30. US EPA National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations: proposed regulation Federal Register 66 2001 2960-3145
31. US EPA State compendium: programs and regulatory activities related to animal feeding operations 2001 Office of Wastewater Management Washington, DC
32. US EPA Notice of data availability, national pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations Federal Register 66 2001 58555-58607
33. US EPA Managing manure nutrients at concentrated animal feeding operations 2001 Office of Water Washington, DC EPA-821-R-01-017, http://www.epa.gov/ost/guide/cafo/ (accessed October 2003)
34. US EPA. EPA and agriculture working together to improve America's waters. EPA Newsroom, December 16, 2002, (http://www.epa.gov/epahome/headline_121602.htm (assessed October 2003)).
35. US EPA National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations Federal Register 68 2003 7176-7274 [regulations to be codified at Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, parts 122 and 412]
36. US General Accounting Office. Livestock agriculture: increased EPA oversight will improve environmental program for concentrated animal feeding operations. GAO-03-285, Washington, DC, 2003 (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03285.pdf (accessed October 2003)).
37. Welsch D.J. Riparian forest buffers: function and design for protection and enhancement of water resources 1991 USDA, Forest Service, NARR-07-91 Northeastern Area, Radnor, PA http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/ n_resource/riparianforests (accessed October 2003)