Enhance reuse of standard e-Business XML schema documents

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-05-01, Issue , 2005, Pages 100-103

  Jeong, Buhwan ^a   Kulvatunyou, Boonserm ^b   Ivezic, Nenad ^b   Cho, Hyunbo ^a   Jones, Albert ^b  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEGRATION; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); INTEROPERABILITY; SPECIFICATIONS; XML;

COMPONENT DISCOVERY TOOLS; INTEGRATION PROBLEMS; SEARCH CONDITIONS; SIMILARITY METRICS;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 33646049321     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., and Yatskevich. M. 2004. S-Match: An Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching. In Proc. of ESWS:61-75.
2. WWW Consortium. 1999. XML PATH Language 1.0.
3. The Open Application Group. 2002. Open Application Group Integration Specification version 8.0.
4. Automotive Industry Action Group. 2005. Proof of Concept Phase 1 Project Summary.
5. McHale, M. 1998. A Comparison of WordNet and Roget's Taxonomy for Measuring Semantic Similarity. In Proc. of the COLING/ACL Workshop on Usage of WordNet in Natural Language Processing Systems, Montreal, Canada: 115-120.
6. Jarmasz, M., and Szpakowicz, S. 2003. Roget's Thesaurus and Semantic Similarity. In Proc. of Conf. on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), Borovets, Bulgaria:212-219.
7. Resnik, P. 1995. Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy. In Proc. of the 14th Intl. Joint Conf. on AI, Montreal, Canada:448-453.
8. Zhang, Z., Li, R., Cao, S., and Zhu, Y. 2003. Similarity Metric for XML Documents. In Proc. of Workshop on Knowledge and Experience Management, Karlsruhe, Germany.
9. Buttler, D. 2004. A Short Survey of Document Structure Similarity Algorithms. In Proc. of the 5th Intl. Conf. on Internet Computing, Las Vegas, Nevada.
10. Bhavsar, V.C., Boley, H., and Yang, L. 2003. A Weighted-Tree Similarity Algorithm for Multi-Agent Systems in e-Business Environments, In Proc. of the Business Agents and the Semantic Web (BASeWEB) Workshop, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
11. Noy, N.F., and Musen, M.A. 2001. Anchor-PROMPT: Using Non-Local Context for Semantic Matching. In Proc. of the Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the 17th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA.
12. Nierman, A. and H.V. 2002. Evaluating Structural Similarity in XML Documents. In Proc. of the 5th Intl. Workshop on the Web and Databases, Madison, WI.
13. Sussna, M. 1993. Word Sense Disambiguation for Free-Text Indexing using a Massive Semantic Network. In Proc. of the 2nd Intl. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, Arlington, VA.
14. Richardson, R., and Smeaton, A.F. 1995. Using WordNet in a Knowledge-based Approach to Information Retrieval, Working Paper, School of computer applications, Dublin City University, Ireland.
15. Flesca, S., Manco, G., Masciari, E., Pntieri, L., and Pugliese, A. 2002. Detecting Structural Similarities between XML Documents. In Proc. of the 5th Intl. Workshop on the Web and Databases, Madison, WI.
16. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., and Halevy, A. 2003. Learning to Match Ontologies on the Semantic Web, VLDB Journal, Special Issue on the Semantic Web.
17. Peng, Y., Zou, Y., Luan, X., Ivezic, N., Gruninger, M., and Jones, A. 2003. Semantic Resolution for e-Commerce, Innovative Concepts for Agent-Based Systems. Springer-Verlag:355-366.
18. Do, H. and Rahm, E. 2001. COMA: A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches, In Proc. of VLDB, Roma, Italy:610-621.
19. nd Edition, Wiley-Inter-science.
20. Castano, S., De Antonellis, V., and De Capitani di Vimercati, S. 2001. Global Viewing of Heterogeneous Data Sources, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 13(2):277-297.