Semantic resolution for E-commerce

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2564, Issue , 2003, Pages 355-366

  Peng, Yun ^a   Zou, Youyong ^a   Luan, Xiaocheng ^a   Ivezic, Nenad ^b   Gruninger, Michael ^b   Jones, Albert ^b  

^a University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; SEMANTICS; COMMERCE; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

FRAME-LIKE STRUCTURES; INTER-AGENT COMMUNICATION; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC DIFFERENCES;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

ABDUCTIVE INFERENCE; APPROXIMATION REASONING; DAML+OIL; FRAME-LIKE; INTER-AGENT COMMUNICATIONS; RUNTIMES; SEMANTIC DIFFERENCE;

EID: 7044221848     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45173-0_27     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bailin, S.C. and Truszkowski, W., Ontology Negotiation between agents supporting intelligent information management, Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, 2001.
2. Berners-Lee, T. What the Semantic Web can represent, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDFnot.html, 1998.
3. Borgida, A., et al. CLASSIC: A Structural Data Model for Objects. In Proc of ACM SIGMOD Intern'l Conference on Management of Data, Portland, OR, June 1989, 59-67.
4. Chen, Y., et al. A Negotiation-Based Multi-agent System for Supply Chain Management. In Proc. of The International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Seattle, May, 1999.
5. DAML home page, http://www.daml.org/.
6. Decker, S. et al, Knowledge representation on the Web. Proceedings of the 2000 International Workshop on Description Logics.
7. Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., and Rice, J. The Ontolingua server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction. Intl. J. Of Human-Computer Studies 46(6):707-727, 1997.
8. Finin, T., Labrou, Y., and Mayfield, J. KQML as an Agent Communication Language, in Jeff Bradshaw (ed.), Software Agents, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
9. FIPA (The Foundation of Intelligent Physical Agents) home page, http://www.fipa.org.
10. Lassila, O. and Swick, R. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/, Feb, 1999.
11. MacGregor, R.M. The Evolving Technology of Classification-based Knowledge Representation Systems. In Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge, J. Sowa (ed.), Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
12. OIL (Ontology Inference Layer) home page, http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/.
13. Pearl, J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1988.
14. Peng Y and Reggia J: Abductive Inference Models for Diagnostic Problem Solving, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY,1990.
15. Russell, S. and Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence, A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.
16. Semantic Web home page, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
17. Stuckenschmidt, H., Using OIL for semantic information Integration. Proceedings of the ECAI workshop on Ontologies and PSMs 2000.
18. Stuckenschmidt, H. and Visser. U., Semantic translation based on approximate re-classification. Proceedings of the Workshop "Semantic Approximation, Granularity and Vagueness, KR'00.
19. UNSPSC, home page, http://www.unspsc.org.
20. Weinstein, P. and Birmingham, W.P., Comparing concepts in differentiated ontologies. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW'99).