Neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of ionizing radiation: Role of adaptive response and bystander effects

Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Volumn 597, Issue 1-2 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 11-17

  Ko, M ^a   Lao, X Y ^a   Kapadia, R ^a   Elmore, E ^a   Redpath, J L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive response; Bystander effect; Low dose radiation; Neoplastic transformation; Threshold dose

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BYSTANDER EFFECT; CANCER CELL; CANCER RISK; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL CULTURE; CELL DENSITY; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPATHOGENIC EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IONIZING RADIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION RESPONSE;

CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL TRANSFORMATION, NEOPLASTIC; CULTURE MEDIA, CONDITIONED; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; GAP JUNCTIONS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; HYBRID CELLS; LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RADIOBIOLOGY;

EID: 33646041592     PISSN: 00275107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Little J.B. The relevance of cell transformation to carcinogenesis in vivo. In: Baverstock K.F., and Strather J.W. (Eds). Low Dose Radiation: Biological Bases of Risk Assessment (1989), Taylor and Francis, London 401-410
2. Bettega D., Calzolari P., Chiorda G.N., and Tallone-Lombardi L. Transformation of C3H 10T1/2 cells with 4.3 MeV alpha particles at low doses: effects of single and fractionated doses. Radiat. Res. 131 (1992) 66-71
3. Azzam E.I., De Toledo S.M., Raaphorst G.P., and Mitchel R. Low dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 cells. Radiat. Res. 146 (1996) 369-373
4. Redpath J.L., and Antoniono R.J. Induction of an adaptive response against low dose gamma radiation. Radiat. Res. 149 (1998) 517-520
5. Redpath J.L., Liang D., Taylor T.H., Christie C., and Elmore E. The shape of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiat. Res. 156 (2001) 700-707
6. Sawant S.G., Randhers-Pehrson G., Geard C.R., Brenner D.J., and Hall E.J. The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis. I. Transformation of C3H 10T1/2 cells in vitro can be initiated in the unirradiated neighbors of irradiated cells. Radiat. Res. 155 (2001) 397-401
7. Sawant S.G., Randhers-Pehrson G., Metting N.F., and Hall E.J. Adaptive response and the bystander effect induced by radiation in C3H 10T1/2 cells in culture. Radiat. Res. 156 (2001) 177-180
8. Redpath J.L., Lu Q., Liao X.-Y., Molloi S.Y., and Elmore E. Low doses of diagnostic energy X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 79 (2003) 235-240
9. Ko S.J., Lao X.-Y., Molloi S., Elmore E., and Redpath J.L. Neoplastic transformation in vitro following exposure to low doses of mammographic energy X-rays: quantitative and mechanistic aspects. Radiat. Res. 162 (2004) 646-654
10. Wolff S. The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications. Environ. Health Perspect. 106 Suppl. (1998) 277-283
11. Morgan W.F. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro. Radiat. Res. 159 (2003) 567-580
12. Mothersill C., and Seymour C. Radiation-induced bystander effects carcinogenesis and models. Oncogene 22 (2003) 7028-7033
13. 3H β-particles in normal human fibroblasts. Radiat. Res. 158 (2002) 181-186
14. Iyer R., and Lehnert B.E. Low dose, low-LET ionizing radiation-induced radioadaptation and associated early responses in unirradiated cells. Mutat. Res. 503 (2002) 1-9
15. Feinendegen L. Relative implications of protective responses versus damage induction at low dose and low-does-rate exposures, using the microdose approach. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 104 (2003) 337-346
16. Redpath J.L., Short S.C., Woodcock M., and Johnston P.J. Low dose reduction in transformation frequency compared to unirradiated controls: the role of hyper-radiosensitivity to cell kill. Radiat. Res. 159 (2003) 433-436
17. Mitchell S.A., Marino S.A., Brenner D.J., and Hall E.J. Bystander effect and adaptive response in C3H 10T1/2 cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 161 (2004) 465-472
18. Rothkamm K., and Lobrich M. Evidence that human cells lack DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low X-ray doses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 5057-5062
19. Pant M.C., Liao X.-Y., Lu Q., Molloi S., Elmore E., and Redpath J.L. Mechanisms of suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation. Carcinogenesis 24 (2003) 1961-1965
20. Stanbridge E.J., Flandemeyer R.R., Daniels D.W., and Nelson-Rees W. Specific chromosome loss associated with tumorigenicity in human cell hybrids. Somat. Cell Genet. 7 (1981) 699-712
21. Russell W.C., Newman C., and Williamson D.H. A simple cytochemical technique for demonstration of DNA in cells infected with mycoplasmas and viruses. Nature 253 (1975) 461-462
22. Mendonca M.S., Antoniono R.J., Sun C., and Redpath J.L. A simplified and rapid staining method for the HeLa × skin fibroblast human hybrid cell neoplastic transformation assay. Radiat. Res. 131 (1992) 345-350
23. Mendonca M.S., Antoniono R.J., Latham K.M., Stanbridge E.J., and Redpath J.L. Characterization of intestinal alkaline phosphatase expression and tumorigenic potential of gamma-irradiated HeLa × skin fibroblast cell hybrids. Cancer Res. 51 (1991) 4455-4462
24. Sun C., Redpath J.L., Colman M., and Stanbridge E.J. Further studies of the radiation-induced expression of a tumor-associated antigen in human cell hybrids. Radiat. Res. 114 (1988) 84-93
25. Han A., and Elkind M.M. Transformation of mouse C3H 10T1/2 cells by single and fractionated doses of X-rays and fission-spectrum neutrons. Cancer Res. 39 (1979) 2123-2130
26. Balcer-Kubiczek E.K., Harrison G.H., and Thompson B.W. Repair time for oncogenic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 cells subjected to protracted X-irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 51 (1987) 219-226
27. El-Fouly M.H., Trosko J.E., and Chang C.C. Scrape-loading and dye transfer: a rapid and simple technique to study gap junctional intercellular communication. Exp. Cell Res. 168 (1987) 422-430
28. Mitchell S.A., Randers-Pehrson G., Brenner D.J., and Hall E.J. The bystander response in C3H 10T1/2 cells: the influence of cell-cell contact. Radiat. Res. 161 (2004) 397-401
29. de Feijter-Rupp H.L., Hayashi T., Kalami G.H., Edwards P., Redpath J.L., Chang C.C., Stanbridge E.J., and Trosko J.E. Restored gap-junctional communication in non-tumorigenic HeLa × normal human fibroblast hybrids. Carcinogenesis 19 (1998) 747-754
30. Ehring G.H., Antoniono R.J., and Redpath J.L. Gap junction expression following UVC-induced neoplastic transformation in human hybrid cell lines. Carcinogenesis 19 (1998) 2085-2093
31. Azzam E.I., de Toledo S.M., and Little J.B. Expression of connexin 43 is highly sensitive to ionizing radiation and other environmental stresses. Cancer Res. 63 (2003) 7128-7135
32. Lewis D.A., Mayhugh B.M., Qin Y., Trott K., and Mendonca M.S. Production of delayed death and neoplastic transformation in CGL1 cells by radiation-induced bystander effects. Radiat. Res. 156 (2001) 251-258
33. Ulsh B.A., Miller S.M., Mallory F.F., Mitchell R.E., Morrison D.P., and Boreham D.P. J. Environ. Radioactiv. 74 (2004) 73-81