Learning to select negotiation strategies in multi-agent meeting scheduling

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-05-09, Issue , 2005, Pages 27-33

  Crawford, Elisabeth ^a   Veloso, Manuela ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES; PLAYBOOK APPROACH; ROBOT SOCCER; SCHEDULING MEETINGS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBOTS; SCHEDULING;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646037359     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Auer, P.; Cesa-Bianchi, N.; Freund, Y.; and Schapire, R. E. 1995. Gambling in a rigged casino: the adversarial multi-armed bandit problem. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 322-331. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
2. Bowling, M.; Browning, B.; and Veloso, M. 2004. Plays as effective multiagent plans enabling opponent-adaptive play selection. In Proceedings of International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS'04). in press.
3. Crawford, E., and Veloso, M. 2004. Opportunities for learning in multi-agent meeting scheduling. In In the Proceedings of the AAAI2004 Symposium on Artificial Multi-agent Learning, Washington, DC.
4. Ephrati, E.; Zlotkin, G.; and Rosenschein, J. S. 1994. A non-manipulable meeting scheduling system. In Proc. International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence.
5. Freund, Y.; Schapire, R. E.; Singer, Y.; and Warmuth, M. K. 1997. Using and combining predictors that specialize. In STOC '97: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, 334-343. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
6. Garrido, L., and Sycara, K. 1995. Multi-agent meeting scheduling: Preliminary experimental results. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'95).
7. Gonzlez, A., and Santos, J. A negotiation protocol for meeting scheduling based on a multiagent system.
8. Jennings, N. R., and Jackson, A. J. 1995. Agent based meeting scheduling: A design and implementation. IEE Electronics Letters 31(5):350-352.
9. Littlestone, N., and Warmuth, M. K. 1989. The weighted majority algorithm. In IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 256-261.
10. Pragnesh Jay Modi, M. V. 2005. Bumping strategies for the private incremental multiagent agreement problem. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Persistant Agents.
11. Sen, S., and Durfee, E. H. 1998. A formal study of distributed meeting scheduling. Group Decision and Negotiation 7:265-289.
12. Sen, S.; Haynes, T.; and Arora, N. 1997. Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 47(3):407-427.
13. Shintani, T.; Ito, T.; and Sycara, K. 2000. Multiple negotiations among agents for a distributed meeting scheduler. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, 435-436.