"Rule + exception" strategies for knowledge management and discovery

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3642 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 69-78

  Yao, Yiyu ^a   Wang, Fei Yue ^b   Wang, Jue ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; EXPERT SYSTEMS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; THEOREM PROVING;

HUMAN LEARNING; IMPLEMENTATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RULE-PLUS-EXCEPTION STRATEGIES;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 33645980346     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11548706_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Anderberg, M.R. Cluster Analysis for Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1973.
2. Berzal, F., Cubero, J.C., Cuenca, F. and Medina, J.M. Relational decomposition through partial funcational dependencies, Data and Knowledge Engineering, 43, 207-234, 2002.
3. Berzal, F., Cubero, J.C., Sánchez, D., and Serrano, J.M. ART: a hybrid classification model, Machine Learning, 54, 67-92, 2004.
4. Cendrowska, J., PRISM: an algorithm for inducing modular rules, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 349-370, 1987.
5. Compton, P. and Jansen, B. Knowledge in context: a strategy for expert system maintenance, The Second Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 292-306, 1988.
6. Gaines, B.R. The trade-off between knowledge and data in knowledge acquisition, in: Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. and Frawley, W.J. (Eds.), AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, 491-506, 1991.
7. Gaines, B.R. and Compton, P. Induction of ripple-down rules applied to modeling large databases, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 5, 211-228, 1995.
8. Goldberg, D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1989.
9. Han, J. and Kamber, M. Data Mining: Concept and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann Publisher, 2000.
10. Holland, J.H., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E. and Thagard, P.R. Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986.
11. Hsieh, C.C., Tsai, T.H., Wible, D. and Hsu, W.L. Exploiting knowledge representation in an intelligent tutoring system for English lexical errors, International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE'02), 115-116, 2002.
12. Kacprzyk, J. and Szkatula, G. A softened formulation of inductive learning and its use for coronary disease data, Fondations of Intelligent System, 15th International Symposium, LNAI 3488, 200-209, 2005.
13. Knorr, E.M. and Ng, R.T. A unified notion of outliers: properties and computation, Proceedings of KDD'97, 219-222, 1997.
14. Lavrač, N., Kavšek, B., Flach, P. and Todorovski, L. Subgroup discovery with CN2-SD, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 153-188, 2004.
15. Li, J. Constructing Classification Trees with Exception Annotations for Large Datasets, M.Sc. Thesis, Simon Fraser University, 1999.
16. Liu, B., Hu, M. and Hsu, W. Intuitive representation of decision trees using general rules and exceptions, Proceedings of AAAI-2000, 615-620, 2000.
17. Liu, B., Hu, M. and Hsu, W. Multi-level organization and summarization of the discovered rules, Proceedings of SIGKDD-2002, 20-23, 2002.
18. Michalski, R.S., Bratko, I. and Kubat, M. (Eds.) Machine Learning and Data Mining: Methods and Applications, Wiley, New York, 1998.
19. Mitchell, T.M. Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1997.
20. Mollestad, T. and Skowron, A. A rough set frameworkf for data mining of prepositional default rules, Foundations of Intelligent Systems, 9th International Symposium, ISMIS'96, LNAI 1079, 448-457, 1996.
21. Nosofsky, R.M., Palmeri, T.J. and McKiley, S.C. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning, Psychological Review, 101, 53-79, 1994.
22. Rector, A. Defaults, context, and knowledge: alternatives for OWL-indexed knowledge bases, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2004, 226-237, 2004.
23. Reiter, R. A logic for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, 13, 81-132, 1980.
24. Russell, S. and Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence, A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall, 1995.
25. Suzuki, E. Autonomous discovery of reliable exception rules, Proceedings of KDD'97, 259-262, 1997.
26. Suzuki, E. and Żytkow, J.M. Unified algorithm for undirected discovery of exception rules, Proceedings of PKDD-2000, 169-180, 2000.
27. Wang, J., Zhao, M., Zhao, K. and Han S. Multilevel data summarization from information system: a "rule + exception" approach, AI Communications, 16, 17-39, 2003.
28. Yao, Y.Y. Ming high order decision rules, in: Rough Set Theory and Granular Computing, Inuiguchi, M., Hirano, S. and Tsumoto, S. (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, 125-135, 2003.
29. Yoshida, T. and Motoda, H. Performance evaluation of fuzing two different knowledge sources in ripple down rules method, Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Active Media Technology, 69-74.
30. Zhong, N., Yao, Y.Y. and Ohshima, M. Peculiarity oriented multidatabase mining, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15, 952-960, 2003.
31. Zhou Y. and Wang J. Rule+exception modeling based on rough set theory, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Proceedings of First International Conference (RSCTC'98), LNAI 1424, 529-536, 1998.