Unconfounding the direction of motion in depth, time to passage and rotation rate of an approaching object

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 2388-2402

  Gray, Rob ^a   Regan, David M ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Motion in depth; Time to passage; Vision and action

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BASEBALL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VARIANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; ROTATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645966231     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adair R.K. The physics of baseball (1990), Harper & Row, New York
2. Bahill A.T., and Karnavas W.J. The perceptual illusion of baseball's rising fastball and breaking curveball. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 3-14
3. Beverley K.I., and Regan D. Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensible to the direction of movement in space. Journal of Physiology 235 (1973) 17-29
4. Bootsma R.J. Predictive information and the control of action: What you see is what you get. International Journal of Sport Psychology 22 (1991) 271-278
5. Breen J.L. What makes a good hitter? Journal of Health. Physical Education and Recreation 38 (1967) 36-39
6. Briggs L. Effects of spin and speed on the lateral direction (curve) of a baseball and the Magnus effect for smooth spheres. American Journal of Physics 27 (1959) 589-596
7. Burroughs W.A. Visual simulation training of baseball batters. International Journal of Sport Psychology 15 (1984) 117-126
8. Davies J.M. The aerodynamics of golf balls. Journal of Applied Physics 20 (1949) 821-828
9. Delucia P.R. Pictorial and motion-based information for depth-perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 738-748
10. DeLucia P.R., Kaiser M.K., Bush J.M., Meyer L.E., and Sweet B.T. Information integration in judgements of time to contact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A-Human Experimental Psychology 56 (2003) 1165-1189
11. Erlichson H. Maximum projectile range with drag and lift with particular application to golf. American Journal of Physics 51 (1983) 357-361
12. Finney D.J. Probit analysis (1971), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. Gray R., and Regan D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research 38 (1998) 499-512
14. Gray R., and Regan D. Estimating time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object. Vision Research 40 (2000) 49-63
15. Gray R., and Regan D. Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Current Biology 10 (2000) 587-590
16. Gray R. Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5 (2002) 1131-1148
17. Gray R., Macuga K., and Regan D. Long range interactions between object motion and self-motion in the perception of movement in depth. Vision Research 44 (2004) 179-195
18. Gray R., Regan D., Castaneda B., and Sieffert R. Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion in depth and control of interceptive action. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1676-1694
19. Harris J.M., and Dean P.J.A. Accuracy and precision of binocular 3-D motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 869-881
20. Harris J.M., and Drga V.F. Using visual direction in three-dimensional motion perception. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 229-233
21. Hoyle F. The black cloud (1957), Penguin, Middlesex, England
22. Kerzel D., Hecht H., and Kim N.G. Image velocity, not tau, explains arrival-time judgments from global optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1540-1555
23. Kohly R., and Regan D. Evidence for a mechanism sensitive to the speed of cyclopean form. Vision Research 39 (1999) 1011-1024
24. Kruk R., and Regan D. Visual test results compared with flying performance in telemetry-tracked aircraft. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 54 (1983) 906-911
25. Landau L.D., and Lifshitz E.M. Fluid mechanics (1959), Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
26. Lee D.N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5 (1976) 437-459
27. Lee D.N., Young D.S., Reddish P.E., Lough S., and Clayton T.M. Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Series A 35 (1983) 333-346
28. Mehta R., and Wood D. Aerodynamics of the cricket ball. New Scientist 7 (1980) 442-447
29. Peper L., Bootsma R.J., Mestre D.R., and Bakker F.C. Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 591-612
30. Portfors-Yeomans C.V., and Regan D. Cyclopean discrimination thresholds for the direction and speed of motion in depth. Vision Research 36 (1996) 3265-3279
31. Portfors-Yeomans C.V., and Regan D. Discrimination of the direction and speed of a monocularly-visible target from binocular information alone. Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 227-243
32. Rayleigh. On the irregular flight of a tennis ball. Scientific Papers 1 (1869-1881) 344
33. Regan D. Visual information channelling in normal and disordered vision. Psychology Review 89 (1982) 407-444
34. Regan D. Visual judgements and misjudgements in cricket, and the art of flight. Perception 21 (1992) 91-115
35. Regan D., and Beverley K.I. Separable after-effects of changing-size and motion in depth: Different neural mechanisms?. Vision Research 19 (1979) 727-732
36. Regan D., and Gray R. Visually-Guided collision avoidance and collision achievement. Trends in Cognitive Science 4 (2000) 99-107
37. Regan D., and Hamstra S. Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion. Vision Research 33 (1993) 447-462
38. Regan D., and Kaushal S. Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth. Vision Research 34 (1994) 163-177
39. Regan D., Beverley K.l., and Cynader M. The visual perception of motion in depth. Scientific American 241 (1979) 136-151
40. Smith M.R., Flach J.M., Dittman S.M., and Stanard T. Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 395-410
41. Todd J.T. Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 810-975
42. Tresilian J.R. Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception 19 (1990) 223-239
43. Tresilian J.R. Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 865-876
44. Tyldesley D.A., and Whiting H.T. Operational timing. Journal of Human Movement Studies 1 (1975) 172-177
45. Watts R.G., and Bahill A.T. Keep your eye on the ball: Curve balls, knuckleballs, and fallacies of baseball (1991), W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
46. Welchman A.E., Tuck V.L., and Harris J.M. Human observers are biased in judging the angular approach of a projectile. Vision Research 44 (2004) 2027-2042
47. Williams T., and Underwood J. The science of hitting (1970), Simon and Schuster, New York