Multivariate uncertainty analysis of an integrated land use and transportation model: MEPLAN

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 191-203

  Clay, Michael J ^a   Johnston, Robert A ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Error analysis; Integrated urban modeling; Land use and transportation modeling; Uncertainty modeling

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION;

INTEGRATED LAND USE; INTEGRATED URBAN MODELING; MULTIVARIATE UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION MODEL; UNCERTAINTY MODELING;

URBAN PLANNING;

ERROR ANALYSIS; LAND USE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33645946716     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abraham J., and Hunt J.D. Policy analysis using the Sacramento MEPLAN land use-transportation interaction model. Transportation Research Record 1685 (1999) 199-208
2. Ashley D.J. Uncertainty in the context of highway appraisal. Transportation 9 (1980) 249-267
3. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 1997. Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual. Federal Highways Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington.
4. Clay M.J., and Johnston R. Univariate uncertainty analysis of a fully integrated land use and transportation model. Transportation Planning and Technology 28 (2005) 149-166
5. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. second ed. (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
6. Harvey, G., Deakin, E., 1995. Description of the STEP analysis package. Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
7. Hunt J.D., and Simmonds D.C. Theory and application of an integrated land use and transport modeling framework. Environment and Planning B 20 (1993) 221-234
8. Johnston, R.A., Rodier, C.J., Abraham, J.E., Hunt, J.D., 2001. Applying an integrated model to the evaluation of travel demand management policies in the Sacramento region: year two. Mineta Transportation Institute Report 01-08, San Jose.
9. Johnston, R., Gao, S., Clay, M.J., 2005. Modeling long-range transportation and land use scenarios for the Sacramento region, using citizen-generated policies. Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies. MTI Report 04-02.
10. Kockelman K., and Krishnamurthy S. Propagation of uncertainty in transportation-land use models: investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTPP predictions in Austin, Texas. Transportation Research Record 1831 (2003) 219-229
11. Lowry I.S. A Model of Metropolis. RM-4035-RC (1964), Rand Corporation, Santa Monica
12. Porter R.C. Economics at the Wheel (1999), Academic Press, New York
13. Pradhan A., and Kockelman K. Uncertainty propagation in an integrated land use-transportation modeling framework: output variation via UrbanSim. Transportation Research Record 1805 (2002) 128-135
14. Robbins J. Mathematical modeling-the error of our ways. Traffic Engineering and Controls 19 (1978) 32-35
15. Rodier C.J., and Johnston R. Uncertain socioeconomic projections used in travel and emissions models: could plausible errors result in air quality nonconformity?. Transportation Research A 36 (2002) 613-619
16. Rodier, C.J., Abraham, J.E., Johnston, R.A., Hunt, D., 2002. A comparison of highway and travel demand management alternatives using an integrated land use and transportation model in the Sacramento region. Presented at the Transportation Research Board, Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
17. Waddell P. UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (2002) 297-314
18. Zhao, Y., Kockelman, K.M., 2001. Propagation of uncertainty through travel demand models. Presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.