Univariate uncertainty analysis of an integrated land use and transportation model: MEPLAN

Transportation Planning and Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 149-165

  Clay, Michael J ^a   Johnston, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Integrated urban modeling; Land use and transportation modeling; MEPLAN; Model uncertainty; Urban policy analysis

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION;

MODEL OUTPUTS; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FORECASTS; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS; UNIVARIATE UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

LAND USE;

LAND USE PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 21244481616     PISSN: 03081060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081060500120233     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Zhao, Y. & Kockelman, K. M. (2001) Propagation of uncertainty through travel demand models, paper presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the US Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
2. Rodier, C. & Johnston, R. (2001) Uncertain socioeconomic projections used in travel and emissions models: could plausible errors result in air quality nonconformity?, paper presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the US Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
3. Pradhan, A. & Kockelman, K. (2002) Uncertainty propagation in an integrated land use-transportation modeling framework: output variation via UrbanSim, Transportation Research Record, 1805, pp. 128-135.
4. Kockelman, K. & Krishnamurthy, S. (forthcoming) Propagation of uncertainty in transportation-land use models: investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTPP predictions in Austin, Texas, Transportation Research Record.
5. Hunt, J. D., Johnston, R., Abraham, J. E., Rodier, C. J., Garry, G. R., Putman, S. H. & de la Barra, T. (2001) Comparisons from Sacramento model test bed, Transportation Research Record, 1780, 53-63.
6. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. & Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (1997) Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual. FHWA Report. FHWA, US Department of Transportation. Available at http:// tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/mvrcm/ (accessed 10 June 2003).
7. Harvey, G. & Deakin, E. (1995) Description of the STEP analysis package, working paper, University of California Berkeley, California.
8. Waddell, P. (2002) UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 297-314.
9. Johnston, R. A. & de la Barra, T. (2000) Comprehensive regional modeling for long-range planning: integrated urban models and geographic information systems, Transportation Research, 34A, 125-136.
10. Rodier, C. J., Abraham, J. E., Johnston, R. A. & Hunt, D. (2002) A comparison of highway and travel demand management alternatives using an integrated land use and transportation model in the Sacramento region, paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the US Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
11. Abraham, J. & Hunt, J. D. (1999) Policy analysis using the Sacramento MEPLAN land use-transportation interaction model, Transportation Research Record, 1685, pp. 199-208.
12. Hunt, J. D. & Simmonds, D. C. (1993) Theory and application of an integrated land use and transport modeling framework, Environment and Planning, 20(B), 221-234.
13. Johnston, R. A., Rodier, C. J., Abraham, J. E. & Hunt, J. D. (2001) Applying an integrated model to the evaluation of travel demand management policies in the Sacramento region: year two, Mineta Transportation Institute Report 01-08., San Jose, CA.
14. Lowry, I. S. (1964) A Model of Metropolis, RM-4035-RC (Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation).
15. Porter, R. C. (1999) Economics at the Wheel (New York: Academic Press).