Reflections on the transformation of European public-sector research

Innovation

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-77

  Senker, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; PUBLIC SECTOR;

EID: 33645890877     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610600607759     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Benner, M. and Sandström, U. (2000) 'Inertia and change in Scandinavian public-sector research systems: The case of biotechnology' Science and Public Policy, 27(6), pp. 443-454.
2. Boseley, S. (2002) 'Scandal of scientists who take money for papers ghostwritten by drug companies', The Guardian, 7 Feb. Accessed 9 March 2006 at http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/4273,4351264,00.html
3. Deangelis, A. D. (2000) 'Conflict of interest and public trust' Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, pp. 2237-2238.
4. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1997) 'Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the triple helix of university-industry-government relations'; Science and Public Policy, 1(24), pp. 2-6.
5. Faulkner, W. & Senker, J., with Velho, L.(1995) Knowledge Frontiers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
6. Freeman, C.(1982) The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.
7. Freeman, C. and Clark, J. and Soete, L.(1982) Unemployment and Technical Innovation. A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development. London: Pinter.
8. Fuller, S.(2000) 'Foreword'. In The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy. (pp. xi-xv). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
9. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M.(1994) The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, LondonThousand Oaks and New Delhi.
10. Grupp, H. and Linstone, H. (1999) 'National Technology Foresight activities around the globe' Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 60(1), pp. 85-94.
11. Hammond, P. W. and Egan, H.(1992) Weighed in the Balance: A History of the Laboratory of the Government Chemist. London: HMSO.
12. Irvine, J.(ed.)(1997) Equipping Science for the 21st Century, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
13. Kenney, M.(1986) Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex. New Haven Conneticut: Yate University Press.
14. Kondratieff, N. D.(1935) 'The long waves in economic life', presented in an English translation in Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 105-115.
15. Larédo, P. (2001) 'Benchmarking of RTD policies in Europe: "research collectives" as an entry point for renewed comparative analyses' Science and Public Policy, 28(4), pp. 285-294.
16. Mason, G. and Wagner, K. (1999) 'Knowledge transfer and innovation in Germany and Britain: "intermediate institution" models of knowledge transfer under strain?' Industry and Innovation, 6(1), pp. 85-109.
17. Noble, D.(1977) America by Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Olivieri, N. (2003) 'Patients' health or company profits? The commercialisation of academic research' Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(1), pp. 29-41.
19. Perez, C. (1983) 'Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems' Futures, 15(5), pp. 357-375.
20. Poti, B. and Reale, E. (2000) 'Convergence and differentiation in institutional change among European public research systems: The decreasing role of public research institutes' Science and Public Policy, 27(6), pp. 421-431.
21. Rip, A.(2000) 'Fashions, lock-ins and the heterogeneity of knowledge production'. In The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy. (pp. 28-39). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
22. Schimank, U. and Winnes, M. (2000) 'Beyond Humboldt? The relationship between teaching and research in European university systems' Science and Public Policy, 27(6), pp. 397-408.
23. Senker, J. (1991) 'Evaluating the funding of strategic science - Some lessons from British experience' Research Policy, 20(1), pp. 29-43.
24. Senker, J. (2001) 'Changing organisation of public sector research in Europe - Implications for benchmarking human resources in RTD' Science and Public Policy, 28(4), pp. 277-284.
25. Senker, J., Balázs, K., Higgins, T., Larédo, P., Muñoz, E., Santesmases, M., Espinosa De Los Monteros, J., Potì, B., Reale, E., Di Marchi, M., Scarda, A., Sandstrom, U., SchimankU., Winnes, M., Skoie, H. & Thorsteinsdottir, H.(1999) European Comparison of Public Research Systems. Final Report, EC TSER Project SOE1-CT98-1117, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, Available at: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/tsfinpub.pdf
26. Senker, J. and Senker, P. (1997) 'Implications of industrial relationships for universities: A case study' Science and Public Policy, 24(3), pp. 173-182.
27. Skoie, H. (2000) 'Faculty involvement in research in mass higher education: Current practice and future perspectives in the Scandinavian countries' Science and Public Policy, 27(6), pp. 409-419.
28. Stokes, D.(1997) Pasteur's Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
29. Thorsteinsdottir, H. (2000) 'Public-sector research in small countries: does size matter?' Science and Public Policy, 27(6), pp. 433-442.
30. Ziman, J.(1994) Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.