Discovery of bitriazolyl compounds as novel antiviral candidates for combating the tobacco mosaic virus

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2693-2698

  Xia, Yi ^a   Fan, Zhijin ^b   Yao, Jianhua ^c   Liao, Quan ^c   Li, Wei ^a   Qu, Fanqi ^a   Peng, Ling ^a,d  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (China)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Antiviral candidates; Bitriazolyl compounds; Huisgen 1,3 cyclcoaddition; Tobacco mosaic virus; Triazoles

Indexed keywords

ANTIVIRUS AGENT; RIBAVIRIN; TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVE;

ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; SYNTHESIS; TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS;

ANTIVIRAL AGENTS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS; TRIAZOLES;

TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS;

EID: 33645885314     PISSN: 0960894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.02.023     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Sidwell R.W., Huffman J.H., Khare G.P., Allen L.B., Witkowski J.T., and Robins R.K. Science 177 (1972) 705
2. De Clercq E. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 1 (2002) 13
3. Al-Soud Y.A., Al-Dweri M.N., and Al-Masoudi N.A. IL FARMACO 59 (2004) 775
4. Lewis W.G., Green L.G., Grynszpan F., Radić Z., Carlier P.R., Taylor P., Finn M.G., and Sharpless K.B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 41 (2002) 1053
5. Bourne Y., Kolb H.C., Radić Z., Sharpless K.B., Taylor P., and Marchot P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 1449
6. Huisgen R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2 (1963) 565
7. Huisgen R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2 (1963) 633
8. Xia Y., Qu F.Q., Li W., Wu Q.Y., and Peng L. Heterocycles 65 (2005) 345
9. -.
10. 2)/3]. The X-ray structure data have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center with deposition No. CCDC 297233. Copy of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ UK (e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
11. Rostovtsev V.V., Green L.G., Fokin V.V., and Sharpless K.B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 41 (2002) 2596
12. -.
13. An T.Y., Huang R.Q., Yang Z., Zhang D.K., Li G.R., Yao Y.C., and Gao J. Phytochemistry 58 (2001) 1267
14. -2 μg/mL. Then, the two separated half leaves were cultured at 25 °C for 72 h. Standard of 2,4-dioxohexahydro-1,3,5-triazine (DHT) and ribavirin were used as control. All treatments were repeated for three times at least. The inhibition percentage was calculated by comparing the average numbers of the viral inflammations on the two halves of leaves according to Formula 1.{A formula is presented}where Y is the antiviral inhibition percentage (%); CK is the average numbers of viral inflammations of the leaf treated with double distilled water; A is the average numbers of viral inflammations of the treated half leaf by title compound. The effects of direct antiviral activity were divided into four levels: excellent, Y > 50%; good, Y: 50-30%; bad, Y: 20-30%; no activity, Y < 20%.
15. Schuster G., Höringklee W., Winter H., Esser G., Steinke U., Kochman W., Kramer W., and Steinke W. Acta Virol. 23 (1979) 412
16. Lerch B. Antiviral Res. 7 (1987) 257
17. Ribavirin is a reference standard used in our laboratories for more than 10 years and its average inhibition against TMV is around 50%.
18. Gozzo F. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51 (2003) 4487
19. Siegrist J., Orober M., and Buchenauer H. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 56 (2000) 95
20. -2 μg/mL was inoculated 7 days later in the top leaf which has grown after the compound application. Each experiment was repeated for five times, while the double distilled water and acibenzolar-S-methyl (BTH) were used as reference control of standard plant activator. The treated tobacco plant was placed at 25 °C for 72 h of cultivation. The induction activity of antiviral efficacy was calculated by comparing the average numbers of the viral inflammations on the top leaf with corresponding control according to the following Formula 2:{A formula is presented}where I is the activities of systemic acquired resistance (%); CK is the average numbers of viral inflammations of control leaves; T is the average numbers of viral inflammations of the inoculated leaves. The induction activities of systemic acquired resistance were divided into four levels: excellent, I > 70%; good, I: 50-70%; bad, I: 30-50%; no induction activity, I < 30%.
21. Liao Q., Yao J.H., Li F., Yuan S.G., Doucet J.P., Panaye A., and Fan B.T. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 15 (2004) 217
22. Introduction about two prediction programs is published in the website: .
23. The accuracy of the prediction model in carcinogenic toxicity is about 84% and that in mutagenic toxicity is about 85%. For the results of PSCT, if the predictability is greater than 70%, non-toxicity is greater than 0.65 and toxicity is less than non-toxicity, the compound is not carcinogenic and its reliability is about 85%. For PSMT, if the predictability is greater than 80% and toxicity is less than non-toxicity, the compound is not mutagenic and its reliability is about 84%.