Dimensionality, Internal Consistency, and Item Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys Activities of Daily Living Instrument Among Patients With Report of Low Back Pain

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 183-189

  Cook, Chad E ^a   Richardson, Jan K ^a   Pietrobon, Ricardo ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities of Daily Living; Item Response Theory; Low Back Pain

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUTRITION; PSYCHOMETRY; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; THEORY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION SURVEYS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33645884729     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Burton A., Tillotson K., Main C., and Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 20 (1995) 722-728
2. Truchon M. Determinants of chronic disability related to low back pain: towards an integrative biopsychosocial model. Disabil Rehabil 23 (2001) 758-767
3. Nattrass C., Nitshcke J., Disler P., Chou M., and Ooi K. Lumbar spine range of motion as a measure of physical and functional impairment; an investigation of validity. Clin Rehabil 13 (1999) 211-218
4. White L., and Velozo C. The use of Rasch measurement to improve the Oswestry classification scheme. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 (2002) 822-831
5. Pengal L., Refshauge K., and Maher C. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine 29 (2004) 879-883
6. Flores L., Gatchel R., and Polatin P. Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care. Spine 15 (1997) 1622-1633
7. Ostelo R., and de Vet H. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19 (2005) 593-607
8. Riddle D., and Stratford P. Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther 78 (1998) 951-963
9. Deaton C. Outcome measurement and evidence based nursing practice. J Cardiovasc Nurs 15 (2001) 83-86
10. Resnik L., and Dobrykowski E. Outcome measurement for patients with low back pain. Orthop Nurs 24 (2005) 14-24
11. Grotle M., Brox J., and Vollestad N. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 30 (2005) 130-140
12. Calmels P., Bethoux F., Condemine A., and Fayolle-Minon I. Low back pain disability assessment tools. Ann Readapt Med Phys 48 (2005) 288-297
13. Stroud M., McKnight P., and Jensen M. Assessment of self-reported physical activity in patients with chronic pain: development of an abbreviated Roland-Morris Disability Scale. J Pain 5 (2004) 257-263
14. Pietrobon R., Coeytaux R., Carey T., Richardson W., and DeVellis R. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction. Spine 27 (2002) 515-522
15. Cook C., Richardson J., Pietrobon R., Braga L., Silva H., and Turner D. Validation of the NHANES ADL instrument in a sample of patients with report of cervical pain: factor analysis, item response theory analysis, and criterion validity. Disabil Rehabil (2005) [in press]
16. Cook C., and Pietrobon R. Dimensionality, internal consistency, and item analysis of the NHANES ADL instrument among patients with report of frequent severe headaches. Physiother Res Int (2005) [in press]
17. Cook C., Erb D., Richardson J., and Pietrobon R. Validation of the NHANES ADL instrument in a sample of community dwelling stroke survivors: factor analysis, item response theory analysis, and criterion validity. J Geriatr Phys Ther (2006) [in review]
18. Deyo R., Battie M., Beurskens A., Bombardier C., Croft P., Koes B., et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine 23 (1998) 2003-2013
19. Beaton D., and Schemitsch E. Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop 413 (2003) 90-105
20. McKevitt C., Redfern J., La-Placa V., and Wolfe C. Defining and using quality of life: a survey of health care professionals. Clin Rehabil 17 (2003) 865-870
21. NHANES 1999-2000 Public Data Release File Documentation. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; updated 2005 Dec 9; cited 2004 Nov 30. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/NHANES19992000FAQS.htm.
22. van der Linden W., and Hambleton R. Handbook of modern item response theory (1997), Springer, New York
23. Kawata A., Coeytaux R., DeVellis R., Finkel A., Mann D., and Kahn K. Psychometric properties of the HIT-6 among patients in a headache specific practice. Headache 45 (2005) 638-643
24. Steinberg L., and Thissen D. Item response theory in personality research. In: Shrout P., and Fiske S. (Eds). Personality research, methods, and theory (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale (NJ) 171-186
25. Embretson S., and Reise S. Item response theory for psychologists (2000), Erlbaum, Hillsdale (NJ)
26. Doyle J. Cooperation and consensus in the outcomes movement. Manag Care Q 3 (1995) 1-5
27. Fritz J., and Irrgang J. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 81 (2001) 776-788
28. Stratford P., and Binkley J. Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale. Spine 22 (1997) 2416-2421
29. Zander K. Historical development of outcomes based care delivery. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 10 (1998) 1-11
30. Mannion A., Elfering A., Staerkle R., Junge A., Grob D., Semmer N., et al. Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?. Eur Spine J 14 (2005) 1014-1026
31. Stratford P., and Binkley J. A comparison study of the back pain functional scale and Roland Morris Questionnaire. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. J Rheumatol 27 (2000) 1928-1936
32. Stratford P., Binkley J., and Riddle D. Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. Spine 25 (2000) 2095-2102