Analysis of tactile exploration on traditional supports in a blind person and design of the Tactos reading interface;Analyse de I'exploration tactile sur support traditionnel chez la personne aveugle et conception de l'interface de lecture Tactos

Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 339-354

  Ali Ammar, Amal ^a   Gapenne, Olivier ^a   Blomme, Elodie ^b   Rovira, Katia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645857064     PISSN: 0992499X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3166/ria.19.339-354     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Ali Ammar A., Conception et validation d'une interface numérique de perception dédiée aux personnes non-voyantes, In J.M.C. Bastien (Ed.), Actes des Deuxièmes journées d'Etude en Psychologie Ergonomique - EPIQUE'2003, (Boulogne-Billancourt, 2-3 octobre), Rocquencourt : Inria, 2003, p. 317-324.
2. Arditi A., Holtzman J.D., Kosslyn S.M., «Mental imagery and sensory experience in congenital blindness », Neuropsychologia, 26, 1998, p. 1-12.
3. Butter E. G., Bjorklund D. F., «Are two hand better than one? Assessing information acquired from one and two handed haptic exploration of random forms », Perceptual and motor skills, 43, 1976, p. 115-121.
4. Davidson P. W., «Haptic judgements in curvature in blind and sighted humans », Journal of experimental psychology, 93, 1972, p. 43-55.
5. th International Conference), 2003.
6. Hatwell Y., Toucher l'espace, Lille: Puf, 1986.
7. Hatwell Y., Psychologie cognitive de la cécité précoce, Paris : Dunod 2003.
8. Jansson G., The Importance of available Exploration Methods for the Efficiency of Haptic Displays.
9. Available at: http://www.ida.liu.se/~ssomc/papers/Jansson.pdf.
10. Kennedy J. M., Gabias P., Nicholls A., Tactile pictures In M. A. Heller et W. Schiff (Eds), The psychology of touch, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991, p 301-325.
11. Loomis J. M., Klatzky R. L., Lederama S. J., «Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view », Perception, 20, 1991, p. 167-177.
12. Landau B., «The construction and use of spatial knowledge in blind and sighted children », In J. Stiles-Davis, M. Kritchevski & U. Bellugi (Eds.), Spatial Cognition: Brain Bases and Development, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, p. 343-371.
13. Lappin J.S., Foulke E., «Expanding the tactual field of view », Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 1973, p. 237-241.
14. Lederman S. J., Klatzky R. L., «Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition », Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1987, p. 342-368.
15. Magee L. E., Kennedy J. M., «Exploring pictures tactually », Nature, 278, 1980, p. 287-288.
16. Millar S., « A reversed lag in the recognition and the production of drawings: theorical implications for haptic coding », In M. A. Heller et W. Schiff (Eds), The psychology of touch, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991, p 301-325.
17. Ramloll R., Brewster S., «A Generic Approach for Augmenting Tactile Diagrams with Spatial Non-Speech Sounds », In Proceedings of the CHI2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2002.
18. Russier S., « Haptic discrimination of two dimensional raised line shapes by blind and sighted adults », Journal of Visual Impairement and Blindness, 93, 1999, p. 421-426.
19. Stevens R. D., Edwards A.D. N., Harling P. A., « Access to mathematics for Visually Disabled Students Through Multimodal Interaction », Human Computer Interaction : Multimodal Interface, 12, London Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, 1997.
20. Stewart J., Gapenne O., «Reciprocal modelling of active perception of 2-D forms in a simple tactile-vision substitution system », Minds and Machines, 14, 2004, p. 309-330.