Linguistic Delivery Style, Client Credibility, and Auditor Judgment

Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2005, Pages 59-86

  Comunale, Christie L ^a   Sexton, Thomas R ^a   Sincich, Terry L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645860177     PISSN: 14751488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1488(04)08003-2     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Adkins M., and Brashers D.E. The power of language in computer-mediated groups. Management Communication Quarterly 8 3 (1995) 289-322
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). Statement on Auditing Statements No. 56: Analytical Procedures (1988), AICPA, New York
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). Statement on Auditing Statements No. 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit (2002), AICPA, New York
4. Anderson U.L., Koonce L., and Marchant G. The effects of source-competence information and its timing on auditor's performance of analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 13 Spring (1994) 137-148
5. Ayers S., and Kaplan S. Potential differences between engagement and risk review partners and their effect on client acceptance judgments. Accounting Horizons (June) 12 2 (1998) 139-153
6. Bamber E.M. Expert judgment in the audit team: A source reliability approach. Journal of Accounting Research 21 Autumn (1983) 396-412
7. Beaulieu P.R. The effects of judgments of new client's integrity upon risks judgments, audit evidence, and fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20 September (2001) 85-99
8. Berlo D.K., Lemert J.B., and Mertz R.J. Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly 33 4 (1969) 563-576
9. Bernardi R.A. Fraud detection: The effect of client integrity and competence and auditor cognitive style. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 13 Supplement (1994) 68-84
10. Bradac J.J., Konsky C.W., and Davies R.A. Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness. Communication Monographs 4 (1976) 70-79
11. Brown P.R. Independent auditor judgment in the evaluation of internal audit functions. Journal of Accounting Research 21 Autumn (1983) 444-455
12. Brune C. The artful interviewer. The Internal Auditor 60 2 (2003) 25-27
13. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). (2000). Audit enquiry: Seeking more reliable evidence from audit enquiry. Toronto, Canada. (CICA).
14. Erickson B., Lind A.E., Johnson B.C., and O'Barr W.M. Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14 May (1978) 266-279
15. Goodwin J. The effects of source integrity and consistency of evidence on auditors' judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18 Fall (1999) 1-16
16. Haleta L.L. Student perceptions of teachers' use of language: The effects of powerful and powerless language on impression formation and uncertainty. Communication in Education 45 January (1996) 16-28
17. Harms L.S. Listener judgments of status cues in speech. Quarterly Journal of Speech 47 (1961) 164-168
18. Hirst D.E. Auditor's sensitivity to source reliability. Journal of Accounting Research 32 Spring (1994) 113-126
19. Hosman L.A., and Wright J.W. The effects of hedges and hesitations on impression formation in a simulated courtroom context. Western Journal of Speech Communication 51 Spring (1987) 173-188
20. Joyce E.J., and Biddle G.C. Are auditor's judgments sufficiently regressive?. Journal of Accounting Research 19 Autumn (1981) 323-349
21. Kaplan S.E., and Reckers P.M.J. An empirical examination of auditors' initial planning process. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 4 1 (1984) 1-19 (Fall)
22. Koonce L., and Phillips F. Auditor's comprehension and evaluation of client-suggested causes in analytical procedures. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8 (1996) 32
23. Lind E.A., and O'Barr W.M. The social significance of speech in the courtroom. In: Giles H., and St Clair R. (Eds). Language and social psychology (1979), Basil Blackwell (U.S. distribution, Baltimore MD: University Park Press), England 66-87
24. Mautz R.K. The nature and reliability of audit evidence. The Journal of Accountancy 105 5 (1958) 40-47 (May)
25. McCroskey J.C. Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs 33 (1966) 65-72
26. McGuire W.J. Persuasion, resistance, and attitude change. In: Pool I. (Ed). Handbook of Communication (1973), McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, IL 16-252
27. Miller G.R., and Hewgill M.A. The effect of variations in nonfluency on audience ratings of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech 50 (1964) 36-44
28. Neter J., Kutner M.H., Wasserman W., and Nachtsheim C.J. Applied linear statistical models. 4th ed. (1996), McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY
29. O'Barr W.M. Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom (1982), Academic Press, New York
30. O'Keefe D.J. Persuasion: Theory and research (1990), Sage Publications, Newbury Park
31. Peecher M.E. The influence of auditors' justification processes on their decisions: A cognitive model and experimental evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 34 1 (1996) 125-140 (Spring)
32. Rebele J.E., Heintz J.A., and Briden G.E. Independent auditor sensitivity to evidence reliability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 8 Fall (1988) 43-52
33. Vinson L., and Johnson C. The use of written transcripts in powerful and powerless language research. Communication Reports 2 (1989) 16-21
34. Wright J.W., and Hosman L.A. Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: The effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression formation. Southern Speech Communication Journal 48 (1983) 137-152