Approaching donor families: Culture, religion & ethnicity

Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 123-129

  Blok, Geke A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Approaching donor families; Attitude toward donation; Culture; Ethnicity; Intercultural sensitivity; Religion

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ETHNOLOGY; FAMILY; HUMAN; ORGAN DONOR; RELIGION; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIETY;

EID: 33645805229     PISSN: 10872418     EISSN: 15317013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mot.0000218923.10364.db     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Johnson LB. Some of the challenges of encouraging organ donation among minority populations. N C Med J 2004; 65:35-36.
2. Rager EL. The donation of human organs and the evolving capacity for transplantation: exciting developments and future prospects. N C Med J 2004; 65:18-25.
3. Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Howard RJ. Organ donation decision: comparison of donor and nondonor families. Am J Transplant 2006; 6:190-198. This article describes a study that was very neatly carried out with a reasonable number of subjects (285). The authors provide a good overview of research about relatives' reasons for consent or refusal. What makes the study interesting is that the authors looked at other variables too, such as how they were approached by the OPO, what they thought about the competence of the requester and whether they thought the donation request was well timed. The way the study was carried out should be an example for other researchers.
4. Mutinga N, Brennan DC, Schnitzler MA. Consequences of eliminating HLA-B in deceased donor kidney allocation to increase minority transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:1090.
5. Sehgal AR. The net transfer of transplant organs across race, sex, age, and income. Am J Med 2004; 117:670-675.
6. Radecki C-M, Jaccard J. Psychological aspects of organ donation: a critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol 1997; 16:183-195.
7. Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Sosa JA, et al. Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: identifying opportunities for intervention. Transplantation 2002; 73:1683-1691.
8. Morgan SE, Miller JK, Arasaratnam LA. Similarities and differences between African-American' and European-Americans' attitudes, knowledge and willingness to communicate about organ donation. J Appl Soc Psychol 2003; 33:693-715.
9. Terrell F, Mosley KL, Terrell AS, Nickerson KJ. The relationship between motivation to volunteer, gender, cultural mistrust, and willingness to donate organs among Blacks. J Natl Med Assoc 2004; 96:53-60.
10. Siminoff LA, Burant C, Youngner SJ. Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59:2325-2334. This is very good article that highlights why professionals, as well as ordinary people, have difficulty with the concept of brain death. Nearly a third of the sample studied were willing to donate the organs of patients they classified as being alive (vegetative state or coma), thereby violating the dead donor rule. The authors indicate that it is not clear whether the public lacks education or is rejecting the current formal medical-legal idea of brain death. Any change in the dead donor rule should be preceded by public debate and education.
11. Achter P, Parrott R, Silk K. African Americans' opinions about human genetics research. Politics and the Life Sciences 2005; 23:60-66.
12. Delmonico FL, Sheehy E, Marks WH, et al. Organ donation and utilization in the United States. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:862-873.
13. Sander SL, Kopp Miller B. Public knowledge and attitudes regarding organ and tissue donation: an analysis of the northwest Ohio community. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 58:154-163. This article is especially useful for the good overview of research results related to viewpoints of minorities and how these differ from mainstream viewpoints. The study that is described is not bad, but only supports earlier findings. Interesting is the comparison with data from 10-15 years ago.
14. nd ed Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2001.
15. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ. Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. New York McGraw-Hill; 2005. This book is an atlas of cultural values and is based on cross-cultural research conducted in 70 countries for more than 30 years. It describes a revolutionary theory of cultural relativism and its applications in a range of professions. It builds on the first book by the first author Culture's Consequences [14] which is an even richer source of cultural information. All healthcare professionals must read both books.
16. Atran S, Norenzayan A. Religion's evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behav Brain Sci 2004; 27:713-730. This is the first article of the journal issue that is completely centered on the scientific approach of religion, a new viewpoint that is worth considering. The evolution of religion is viewed from a psychobiological point of view.
17. Hoffer C. Levenbeschouwing en orgaandonatie. Een vergelijking van joodse, christelijke, islamitische en humanistische opvattingen. [Denomination and organ donation. A comparison of Jewish, Christian, Islamic and Humanistic points of view]. Leiden: Dutch University Press; 2002.
18. Sanders J. Leven door geven. Religieuze en levenbeschouwelijke standpunten over orgaan- en weefseldonatie [Religious and denominational viewpoints about organ and tissue donation]. Zoetermeer: Meinema; 2003.
19. Grazi RV, Wolowelsky JB. Jewish medical ethics: monetary compensation for donating kidneys. Isr Med Assoc J 2004; 6:185-188.
20. Alkhawari FS, Stimson GV, Warrens AN. Attitudes toward transplantation in U.K. Muslim Indo-Asians in west London. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:1326-1331. In this article a grassroots approach is described, 141 Muslims were observed in their daily functioning. It gives more insight into the ordinary Muslim's views on healthcare in general and organ donation particularly. ..The authors put the results in a broader perspective of how Islam is dealing with organ donation. The article provides a good overview of the dilemmas Muslims are facing.
21. Sato H, Akabayashi A, Kai I. Public appraisal of government efforts and participation intent in medico-ethical policymaking in Japan: a large scale national survey concerning brain death and organ transplant. BMC Medical Ethics 2005; 6:E1.
22. Yew YW, Saw SM, Pan JCH, et al. Knowledge and beliefs on corneal donation in Singapore. Br J Ophtalmol 2005; 89:835-840.
23. Yee BWK. Health and health care of Southeast Asian American elders: Vietnamese, Cambodian, Hmong and Laotian elders. Galveston: University of Texas Medical Branch, Texas Consortium of Geriatric Education Centers; 2004. In this publication a good description is given of health and death beliefs of four southeast Asian populations: Vietnamese, Cambodjan, Laotian and Hmong. It gives a good insight in why these people feel tensions with the mainstream views about health and death and how healthcare is organized.
24. Muthny FA, Smit H, Molzahn AE. Communication with relatives of the suddenly dead and the request for organ donation [in German]. Intensiv Medizin 2004; 41:255-262.
25. Siminoff LA, Lawrence RH, Arnold RM. Comparison of black and white families' experiences and perceptions regarding organ donation requests. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:146-151.
26. Davis C, Randhawa G. "Don't know enough about it!": awareness and attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation among the black Caribbean and black African population in Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham, United Kingdom. Transplantation 2004; 78:420-425. In this article the results of a grassroots approach among black Caribbean and black African populations are described. It is one of the few studies about these populations in the UK. The article is interesting because the authors got very private and honest answers from their subjects. It is the only study known to me in which minorities took a critical look at themselves and indicated that they also should take action, instead of waiting.
27. Gibbs DM. A minority perspective. The state of minority donation in North Carolina. N C Med J 2004; 65:37-39.
28. Molzahn AE, Starzomski R, McDonald M, Oloughlin C. Aboriginal beliefs about organ donation: some Coast Salish viewpoints. CJNR 2004; 36:110-128.
29. Arriola KRJ, Perryman JP, Doldren M. Moving beyond the attitudinal barriers: understanding African Americans' support for organ and tissue donation. J Natl Med Assoc 2005; 97:339-350.
30. Barber KM, Hussey JC, Bond ZC, et al. The UK National Potential Donor Audit. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:568-570.
31. Molzahn AE, Starzomski R, McDonald M, O'Loughlin C. Chinese Canadian beliefs toward organ donation. Qual Health Res 2005; 15:82-98.
32. Perkins HS, Shepherd KJ, Cortez JD, Hazuda HP. Exploring chronically ill seniors' attitudes about discussing death and postmortem medical procedures. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53:895-900.
33. Sirois BC, Sears SF, Marhefka S. Do new drivers equal new donors? An examination of factors influencing donation attitudes and behaviors in adolescents. J Behav Med 2005; 28:201-212.
34. Bowman KW, Richard SA. Cultural considerations for Canadians in the diagnosis of brain death. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51:273-275. This is a very interesting article about cultural perceptions and values regarding brain death. It is one of the few that describes a viewpoint from different perspectives and from different stakeholders in the donation process. In particular, the call for cultural awareness in healthcare staff is appealing.
35. Perkins HS, Cortez JD, Hazuda HP. Advance care planning: does patient sex make a difference? Am J Med Sci 2004; 327:25-32.
36. King LP, Siminoff LA, Meyer DM, et al. Health insurance and cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:1388-1391.
37. Siminoff LA, Lawrence RH. Knowing patients' preference about organ donation: does it make a difference? J Trauma 2002; 53:754-760.
38. Boulware LE, Meoni LA, Fink NE, et al. Preferences, knowledge, communication and patient-physician discussion of living kidney transplantation in African American families. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:1503.
39. Pham H, Spigner C. Knowledge and opinions about organ donation and transplantation among Vietnamese Americans in Seattle, Washington: a pilot study. Clin Transplant 2004; 18:707-715.
40. Zaller N, Nelson KE, Ness P, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice survey regarding blood donation in a Northwestern Chinese city. Transfusion Medicine 2005; 15:277-286.
41. Jabbour N, Gagandeep S, Matea R, et al. Live donor liver transplantation without blood products - Strategies developed for Jehovah's Witnesses offer broad application. Ann Surg 2004; 240:350-357.
42. McIlveney FK, Pace NA. Jehovah's Witnesses. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 5:57-59.
43. Jabbour N, Gagandeep S, Bramstedt A, et al. To do or not do living donor hepatectomy in Jehovah's Witnesses: single institution experience of the first 13 resections. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:1141-1145.
44. Schneider E. The effects of religiosity and integrity on the decision to be an organ donor. Educational material. Seminar Research Sociology 2002. http://alpha.furman.edu, [Accessed: 2 November 2005]
45. Akrami SM, Osati Z, Zahedi F, Raza M. Brain death: Recent ethical and religious considerations in Iran. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:2883-2887.
46. Kim JR, Elliott D, Hyde C. The influence of sociocultural factors on organ donation and transplantation in Korea: findings from key informant interviews. J Transcult Nurs 2004; 15:147-154.
47. Sanal A. 'Robin Hood' of techno-Turkey or organ trafficking in the state of ethical beings. Cult Med Psychiatry 2004; 28:281-309.
48. Shaheen FA, Souqiyyeh MZ. How to improve organ donation in the MESOT countries. Ann Transplant 2004; 9:19-21.
49. Molzahn AE, Starzomski R, McCormick J. The supply of organs for transplantation: issues and challenges. Nephrol Nurs J 2003; 30:17-26.
50. Kim JR, Elliott D, Hyde C. Korean health professionals' attitudes and knowledge toward organ donation and transplantation. Int J Nurs Stud 2004; 41:299-307.
51. Bilgel H, Sadikoglu G, Goktas O, Bilgel N. A survey of the public attitudes towards organ donation in a Turkish community and of the changes that have taken place in the last 12 years. Transpl Int 2004; 17:126-130.
52. Siminoff LA, Saunders-Sturm CM. African-American reluctance to donate: beliefs and attitudes about organ donation and implications for policy. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2000; 10:59-74.
53. Pietz CA, Mayes T, Naclerio A, Taylor R. Pediatric organ transplantation and the hispanic population: approaching families and obtaining their consent. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:1237-1240.
54. Al-Sebayel MI, Khalaf H. Knowledge and attitude of intensivists toward organ donation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:1883-1884.
55. Epstein AM, Ayanina JZ. Racial disparities in medical care [editorial]. N Engl J Med 2005; 344:1471-1472.
56. Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA 2001; 286:71-77.
57. Sheets-Johnstone M. Size, power and death. Constituents in the making of human morality. J Consciousness Studies 2002; 9:49-67.
58. Morgan SE, Harrison TR, Long SD, et al. Family discussions about organ donation: how the media influences opinions about donation decisions. Clin Transpl 2005; 19:674-682.
59. Piccoli GB, Soragna G, Putaggio S, et al. Efficacy of an educational program on dialysis, renal transplantation, and organ donation on the opinions of high school students: a randomized controlled trial. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:431-432.
60. Reubsaet A, Brug J, Kitslaar J, et al. The impact and evaluation of two school-based interventions on intention to register an organ donation preference. Health Educ Res 2004; 19:447-456.
61. Burger JM, Messian N, Patel S, et al. What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. PSPB 2004; 30:35-43. In this article some experiments are described in which the effects of incidental similarities, not related to organ donation, are measured. The experiments are carried out in an excellent way, so that the results are robust. These are very useful for experiments that should be carried out to increase the number of positive decisions about organ donation. The methodology can also be used.
62. Kalble T, Lucan M, Nicita G, et al. Guidelines on renal transplantation. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2004.
63. Coolican M-B, Politoski G. Donor family programs. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 1994; 6:613-623.
64. Blok GA, Dalen van J, Jager K, et al. The European Donor Hospital Education Programme [EDHEP]: addressing the training needs of doctors and nurses who break bad news, care for the bereaved, and request donation. Transpl Int 1999; 12:161-167.
65. Blok GA. Dealing with grief and requesting donation: an international challenge. Effects of the European Donor Hospital Education Programme [Dissertation]. Maastricht: Unigraphic; 2003.
66. Morton J, Blok GA, Reid C, et al. The European Donor Hospital Education Programme [EDHEP]: enhancing communication skills with bereaved relatives. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000; 28:184-190.
67. Blok GA. Effects of a course for requesters in The Netherlands. Transpl Int 2005; 18(Suppl 1):68.
68. Silverman J, Kurtz S, Draper J. Skills for communicating with patients. Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd; 1998.
69. Blok GA. The impact of changes in practice in organ procurement on the satisfaction of donor relatives. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 58:104-113. In this article the results of longitudinal comparative study is described. The study was undertaken to explore if any changes had occurred in the behaviour of professionals involved in organ donation over a period of more than 10 years. Satisfaction ratings of different groups of donor relatives were taken as outcome measures. Evaluations were gathered about the whole process from arrival in hospital to aftercare. Relatives in later years were significantly more satisfied than in earlier years about professional staff behaviour. How death was announced explained 60% of the variance of the satisfaction about the donation procedure, general information supply and genuine understanding were other important variables. Results indicate that future interventions aiming at decreasing the number of family refusals should therefore be competence-based.
70. Cerney MS. Solving the organ donor shortage by meeting the bereaved family's needs. Crit Care Nurse 1993; 13:32-36.
71. Coleman D. Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books; 1998.