Capturing expert knowledge with argumentation: A case study in bioinformatics

Bioinformatics

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 924-933

  Jefferys, Benjamin R ^a   Kelley, Lawrence A ^a   Sergot, Marek J ^a   Fox, John ^b   Sternberg, Michael J E ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS;

EID: 33645801005     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl018     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
2. Bland,M. (1989) An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp.149-151.
3. Brenner,S.E. et al. (2000) The ASTRAL compendium for sequence and structure analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 254-256.
4. Cayrol,C., Doutre,S. and Mengin,J. (2003) On decision problems related to the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks. J. Logic. Comput., 13, 377-403.
5. Christendat,D. et al. (2000) Structural proteomics of an archaeon. Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 903-909.
6. Drawid,A. and Gerstein,M. (2000) A Bayesian system integrating expression data with sequence patterns for localizing proteins: comprehensive application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol., 301, 1059-1075.
7. Dung,P.M. (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell., 77, 321-357.
8. Fox,J. (2003) Probability, logic and the cognitive foundations of rational belief. J. Appl. Logic, 1, 197-224.
9. Fox,J., Glasspool,D. and Bury,J. (2001) Quantitative and qualitative approaches to reasoning under uncertainty in medical decision making. Proceedings of the AIME 2001, Cascais, Portugal, 2101, pp. 272-282.
10. Hautaniemi,S. et al. (2005) Modeling of signal response cascades using decision tree analysis. Bioinformatics, 21, 2027-2035.
11. Jansen,R. et al. (2003) A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein - protein interactions from genomic data. Science, 302, 449-453.
12. Kelley,L.A. et al. (2000) Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J. Mol. Biol., 299, 499-520.
13. Krause,P.J. et al. (1995) A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Comp. Intell., 11, 113-131.
14. Krause,P. et al. (1998) Qualitative risk assessment fulfils a need. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1455, 138-156.
15. Marshall,C.C. (1989) Representing the structure of a legal argument. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 121-127.
16. Modgil,S. and Fox,J.(ed). (2004) Review of argumentation technology: state of the art, technical and user requirements. Proceedings of the ASPIC Consortium.
17. Murzin,A.G. et al. (1995) SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
18. Reed,C. and Grasso,F. (2001) Computational models of natural language argument. Proceedings of the ICCS 2001. Springer-Verlag, 2073, 999-1008.
19. Toulmin,S.E. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
20. Upshur,R.E.G. and Colak,E. (2003) Argumentation and evidence. Theor. Med. Bioeth., 24,283-299.