Computational models of natural language argument

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2073, Issue , 2001, Pages 999-1008

  Reed, Chris ^a   Grasso, Floriana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF NATURAL LANGUAGE ARGUMENTS; COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84949633062     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45545-0_112     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. [1] J.F. Allen. Natural Language Understanding. The Benjamin/Cummings Publish- ing Company, Inc., 2nd edition, 1995.
2. [2] D.E. Appelt. Planning English Sentences. Studies in Natural Language Process- ing. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
3. [3] J. Austin. How To Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press, 1975.
4. [4] J.B. Bavelas, A. Black, N. Chovil, and J. Mullet. Truth, lies and equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(1-2):135-161, 1990.
5. [5] G. Carenini. GEA: a Complete, Modular System for Generating Evaluative Ar- guments. In (current volume).
6. [6] V. Carofiglio and F. de Rosis. Exploiting Uncertainty and Incomplete Knowledge in Deceptive Argumentation. In (current volume).
7. [7] R. Cohen. Analyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 13(1-2):11-24, 1987.
8. J. Crosswhite, J. Fox, C.A. Reed, T. Scaltsas, and S. Stumpf. Computational Models of Rhetoric. In Reed et al. [39], (to appear).
9. [9] H. Dalianis and P. Johannesson. Explaining Conceptual Models - Using Toulmin's argumentation model and RST. In Proceedings of The Third International work- shop on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP98), pages 131-140, 1998.
10. [10] M. Elhadad. Using Argumentation in Text Generation. Journal of Pragmatics, 24:189-220, 1995.
11. A. Fiedler and H. Horacek. Argumentation in Explanations to Logical Problems. In (current volume).
12. [12] J. Fox and S. Das. A unified framework for hypothetical and practical reasoning (2): lessons from medical applications. In D. Gabbay and H.J. Olbach, editors, Practical Reasoning: Proceedings of FAPR'96. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
13. [13] J. Fox, P. Krause, and M. Elvang-Goransson. Argumentation as a General Frame- work for Uncertain Reasoning. In D. Heckerman and A. Mamdani, editors, Pro- ceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 428-434. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993.
14. [14] J.B. Freeman, editor. Dialectics and the MacroStructure of Argument. Foris, 1991.
15. [15] S. Gavenko. Analysis of the Argumentative Effect of Evaluative Semantics in Natural Language. In (current volume).
16. [16] M.A. Gilbert. Getting Good Value: Facts, Values and Goals in Computational Linguistics. In (current volume).
17. [17] M.A. Gilbert, F. Grasso, L. Groarke, C. Gurr, and J.M. Gerlofs. The Persuasion Machine: An Exercise in Argumentation and Computational Linguistics. In Reed et al.[39], (to appear).
18. [18] F. Grasso, A. Cawsey, and R. Jones. Dialectical Argumentation to Solve Conflicts in Advice Giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(6):1077-1115, 2000.
19. N. Green. An Empirical Study of Multimedia Argumentation. In (current volume).
20. [20] R. Grishman. Computational Linguistics: an Introduction. Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, 1986.
21. [21] L. Groarke. Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic, 18(2-3):105-129, 1996.
22. [22] B.J. Grosz and C.L Sidner. Plans for Discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication, chapter 20, pages 417-444. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1990.
23. [23] E. Hovy. Pragmatics and Natural Language Generation. Artificial Intelligence, 43:153-197, 1990.
24. [24] E. Hovy. Automated Discourse Generation using Discourse Structure Relations. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1-2):341-385, 1993.
25. [25] K. Jokinen, M. Maybury, M. Zock, and I. Zukerman, editors. Proceedings of the ECAI-96 Workshop on: Gaps and Bridges: New directions in Planning and NLG, 1996.
26. [26] N. Karacapilidis. An Argumentation Based Framework for Defeasible and Quali- tative Reasoning. In Jokinen et al. [25], pages 37-42.
27. [27] W. Mann and S. Thompson. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text, 8(3):243-281, 1988.
28. [28] D. Marcu. The Conceptual and Linguistic Facets of Persuasive Arguments. In Jokinen et al.[25], pages 43-46.
29. [29] D. Marcu. The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. MIT Press, 2000.
30. [30] M. Maybury. Planning multimedia explanations using communicative acts. In Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI91), pages 61-66. AAAI, MIT press, July 1991.
31. [31] M. Maybury. Communicative Acts for Generating Natural Language Argu- ments. In Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI93), pages 357-364. AAAI, AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1993.
32. [32] P. McBurney and S. Parsons. Agent ludens: Games for agent dialogues. In P. Gmytrasiewicz and S. Parsons, editors, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Game-Theoretic and Decision-Theoretic Agents (GTDT2001), AAAI Spring Symposium. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 2001.
33. [33] K. McKeown. Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategy and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Texts. Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
34. [34] J. Moore and C. Paris. Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing In- tentional and Rhetorical Information. Computational Linguistics, 19(4):651-695, 1993.
35. [35] C. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: a treatise on argumen- tation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1969.
36. [36] J. Pollock. OSCAR: a General Theory of Rationality. In R. Cummins and J. Pol- lock, editors, Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface, chapter 9, pages 189-213. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1991.
37. [37] C.A. Reed. The Role of Saliency in Generating Natural Language Arguments. In T. Dean, editor, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'99), pages 876-881. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1999.
38. [38] C.A. Reed and D.P. Long. Generating the structure of argument. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98), pages 1091-1097, 1998.
39. [39] C.A. Reed, T.J. Norman, and D. Gabbay, editors. Argument and Computation. (to appear).
40. [40] E. Reiter and R. Dale. Building Applied Natural Language Generation Systems. Natural Language Engineering, 3(1):57-87, 1997.
41. [41] S. Teufel, J. Carletta, and M. Moens. An Annotation Scheme for Discourse-Level Argumentation in Research Articles. In Proceedings of EACL, 1999.
42. [42] S. Toulmin. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
43. [43] F. van Eemeren, R. Grootensdorst, F. Henkemans, J.A. Blair, R. Johnson, E. Krabbe, C. Plantin, D. Walton, C. Willard, J. Woods, and D. Zarefsky. Fun- damentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1996.
44. [44] M.A. Walker. The Effect of Resource Limits and Task Complexity on Collabora- tive Planning in Dialogue. Artificial Intelligence, 85(1-2):181-243, 1996.
45. [45] P. Wason. Reasoning. In B.M. Foss, editor, New Horizons in Psychology. Har- mondsworth: Penguin., 1966.
46. [46] B.A. Wilson. The Anatomy of Argument. University Press of America, 1980.
47. I. Zukerman, K. Korb, and R. McConachy. Perambulations on the Way to an Architecture for a Nice Argument Generator. In Jokinen et al. [25], pages 32-36.
48. [48] I. Zukerman, R. McConachy, and K. Korb. Using Argumentation Strategies in Automated Argument Generation. In M. Elhadad, editor, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG-2000), pages 55-62, 2000.