Factors affecting impedance of percutaneous leads in spinal cord stimulation

Neuromodulation

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 128-135

  Alò, Kenneth ^a   Varga, Clayton ^b   Krames, Elliot ^c   Prager, Joshua ^d   Holsheimer, Jan ^e   Manola, Ljubomir ^e   Bradley, Kerry ^f  

^a Pain and Health Management Center   (United States)

^b Pasadena Rehabilitation Institute   (United States)

^c Pacific Pain Treatment Centers   (United States)

^d California Pain Medicine Centers   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^f ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrical impedance; Energy consumption; Epidural space; Percutaneous lead; Spinal cord stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME TYPE I; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; MALE; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NEUROPATHY; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; RADICULOPATHY; SPINAL CORD STIMULATION; THORACIC SPINE;

EID: 33645792816     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2006.00050.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barolat G Zeme S Ketcik B Multifactorial analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulation Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1991 56 77 103
2. de Jongste MJL Nagelkerke D Hooyschuur CM et al. Stimulation characteristics, complications, and efficacy on spinal cord stimulation systems in patients with refractory angina: a prospective feasibility study Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994 17 1751 1760
3. Andersen C Time dependent variations of stimulus requirements in spinal cord stimulation for angina pectoris Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997 20 359 363
4. Spangenberg P Time-dependent variation of stimulus requirements of single SCS (spinal cord stimulation) leads with respect to pain relief Proceedings of 54th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery, Saarbrucken, May 25-28, 2003
5. Barolat G Sharan AD Future trends in spinal cord stimulation Neurol Res 2000 22 279 284
6. R Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Implant Manual Model 3487A Lead Kit Minneapolis, MN Medtronic, Inc. 1996
7. TM 3890 Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)Technical Manual Minneapolis, MN Medtronic, Inc. 2002
8. Manola LJ Holsheimer J Technical performance of percutaneous and laminectomy leads analyzed by modeling Neuromodulation 2004 7 231 241
9. Alo KM Holsheimer J New trends in neuromodulation for the management of neuropathic pain Neurosurgery 2002 50 690 704
10. North RB Kidd DH Olin JC Sieracki JM Spinal cord stimulation electrode design prospective randomized controlled trial comparing percutaneous laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes Neurosurgery 2002 51 381 390
11. Holsheimer J den Boer JA Struijk JJ Rozenboom AR MR assessment of the normal position of the spinal cord in the spinal canal Am J Neuroradiol 1994 15 951 959
12. Struijk JJ Holsheimer J Barolat G He J Boom HBK Paresthesia thresholds in spinal cord stimulation: a comparison of theoretical results with clinical data IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1993 1 101 108
13. He J Barolat G Holsheimer J Struijk JJ Perception threshold and electrode position for spinal cord stimulation Pain 1994 59 55 63
14. Manola LJ Holsheimer J Veltink PH Technical performance of percutaneous leads for spinal cord stimulation: a modeling study Neuromodulation 2005 8 88 99
15. Altman DG Practical Statistics for Medical Research London Chapman & Hall 1991
16. Rohen JW Yokochi C Luten-Drecoll E Color Atlas of Anatomy: A Photographic Study of the Human Body 4th edn Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1993
17. Oakley JC Prager JP Spinal cord stimulation mechanisms of action Spine 2002 27 2574 2583
18. Grill WM Mortimer JT Electrical properties implant encapsulation tissue Ann Biomed Eng 1994 22 23 33
19. Tulgar M Barolat G Ketcik B Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation 1. Perception and tolerance thresholds resulting from 1100 combinations Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1993 61 129 139
20. Barolat G Experience with 509 plate electrodes implanted epidurally from C1 to L1 Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1993 61 60 79
21. Tomaszek DE Spinal cord stimulator lead revision in late pain recurrence from epidural fibrosis Proceedings of the International Neuromodulation Society Third Scientfic Meeting, Orlando, Florida, March 1996
22. Loge D Devulder JER De Coster O De Colvenaer L Mortier E The epidural fibrous sheath: a guide for the replacement of a spinal cord stimulation electrode Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002 27 353 356
23. North RB Lanning A Hessels R Cutchis PN Spinal cord stimulation with percutaneous and plate electrodes: side effects and quantitative comparisons Neurosurg Focus 1990 2 1 5