-
1
-
-
0042242875
-
Consent for anaesthesia
-
White S, Baldwin T. Consent for anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:760-774.
-
(2003)
Anaesthesia
, vol.58
, pp. 760-774
-
-
White, S.1
Baldwin, T.2
-
2
-
-
0037342820
-
General principles of consent
-
Danbury C. General principles of consent. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:281.
-
(2003)
Anaesthesia
, vol.58
, pp. 281
-
-
Danbury, C.1
-
3
-
-
0036326838
-
The importance of patient autonomy at birth
-
Brooks H, Sullivan W. The importance of patient autonomy at birth. Int J Obstet Anesth 2002; 11:196-203.
-
(2002)
Int J Obstet Anesth
, vol.11
, pp. 196-203
-
-
Brooks, H.1
Sullivan, W.2
-
4
-
-
0031467415
-
Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: Informed consent issues
-
Pattee C, Ballantyne M, Milne B. Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: informed consent issues. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44:918-923.
-
(1997)
Can J Anaesth
, vol.44
, pp. 918-923
-
-
Pattee, C.1
Ballantyne, M.2
Milne, B.3
-
5
-
-
0034581776
-
Informed consent for labour epidurals: What labouring women want to know
-
Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, VanDenKerkhof E, Milne B. Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know. Can J Anesth 2000; 47:1068-1073.
-
(2000)
Can J Anesth
, vol.47
, pp. 1068-1073
-
-
Jackson, A.1
Henry, R.2
Avery, N.3
VanDenKerkhof, E.4
Milne, B.5
-
6
-
-
1642416889
-
Consent for regional anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: What is material risk?
-
Kelly G, Blunt C, Moore P, Lewis M. Consent for regional anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: what is material risk? Int J Obstet Anaesth 2004; 13:71-74.
-
(2004)
Int J Obstet Anaesth
, vol.13
, pp. 71-74
-
-
Kelly, G.1
Blunt, C.2
Moore, P.3
Lewis, M.4
-
7
-
-
33645790277
-
Consent issues in obstetric anaesthesia
-
[letter]
-
Meek T. Consent issues in obstetric anaesthesia [letter]. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:404-406.
-
(2003)
Anaesthesia
, vol.58
, pp. 404-406
-
-
Meek, T.1
-
8
-
-
0037021846
-
Informed consent: Lessons from Australia
-
Skene L, Smallwood R. Informed consent: lessons from Australia. BMJ 2002; 324:39-41.
-
(2002)
BMJ
, vol.324
, pp. 39-41
-
-
Skene, L.1
Smallwood, R.2
-
9
-
-
0141962700
-
A randomised controlled trial of fluid pre-loading before low dose epidural analgesia for labour
-
Kubli M, Shennan AH, Seed PT, O'Sullivan G. A randomised controlled trial of fluid pre-loading before low dose epidural analgesia for labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003; 12:256-260.
-
(2003)
Int J Obstet Anesth
, vol.12
, pp. 256-260
-
-
Kubli, M.1
Shennan, A.H.2
Seed, P.T.3
O'Sullivan, G.4
-
10
-
-
33645775497
-
-
Lawrence v NT of Australia & Others NTSC 37. Available from:
-
Lawrence v NT of Australia & Others [2001] NTSC 37. Available from: http://www.nt.gov.au/ntsc/doc/judgements/2001/0/NS000570.htm
-
(2001)
-
-
-
11
-
-
0001929569
-
Postpartum Headache
-
Chestnut DH, editor. St. Louis: Mosby
-
Weeks S. Postpartum Headache. In: Chestnut DH, editor. Obstetric anaesthesia. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999, 621-638.
-
(1999)
Obstetric Anaesthesia
, pp. 621-638
-
-
Weeks, S.1
-
12
-
-
0035135840
-
A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labour
-
Howell CJ, Kidd C, Roberts W, et al. A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labour. BJOG Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108:27-33.
-
(2001)
BJOG Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.108
, pp. 27-33
-
-
Howell, C.J.1
Kidd, C.2
Roberts, W.3
-
13
-
-
4544294864
-
Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour (Cochrane Review)
-
Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
-
Howell C. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 2004; Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
-
(2004)
The Cochrane Library
-
-
Howell, C.1
-
14
-
-
8444225336
-
Labor course and delivery in epidural analgesia: A case-control study
-
Decca L, Daldoss C, Fratelli N et al. Labor course and delivery in epidural analgesia: a case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 16:115-118.
-
(2004)
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
, vol.16
, pp. 115-118
-
-
Decca, L.1
Daldoss, C.2
Fratelli, N.3
-
17
-
-
33645775737
-
-
25th-Illustrated Ed. Hensyl WR ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
-
Stedman TL. Medical Dictionary. 25th-Illustrated Ed. Hensyl WR ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1990, p. 1131.
-
(1990)
Medical Dictionary
, pp. 1131
-
-
Stedman, T.L.1
-
18
-
-
0031984205
-
Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: A prospective analysis of 10 995 cases
-
Paech MJ, Godkin R, Webster S. Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective analysis of 10 995 cases. Int J Obstet Anesth 1998; 7:5-11.
-
(1998)
Int J Obstet Anesth
, vol.7
, pp. 5-11
-
-
Paech, M.J.1
Godkin, R.2
Webster, S.3
-
19
-
-
0029101541
-
Serious complications associated with epidural/spinal blockade in obstetrics: A two year prospective study
-
Scott DB, Tunstall ME. Serious complications associated with epidural/spinal blockade in obstetrics: a two year prospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth 1995; 4:133-139.
-
(1995)
Int J Obstet Anesth
, vol.4
, pp. 133-139
-
-
Scott, D.B.1
Tunstall, M.E.2
-
20
-
-
21644447169
-
Infection as a complication of neuraxial blockade
-
Reynolds F. Infection as a complication of neuraxial blockade. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005; 14:183-188.
-
(2005)
Int J Obstet Anesth
, vol.14
, pp. 183-188
-
-
Reynolds, F.1
-
22
-
-
0031984687
-
Epidural analgesia for low risk labour determines the rate of instrumental deliveries but not that of caesarean sections
-
Cammu H,Martens G, Van Maele G. Epidural analgesia for low risk labour determines the rate of instrumental deliveries but not that of caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 18:25-29.
-
(1998)
J Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.18
, pp. 25-29
-
-
Cammu, H.1
Martens, G.2
Van Maele, G.3
|