Correlation between cardiac output measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique pulmonary arterial and that measured by contour pulse analysis in a paediatric animal model

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 19-23

  López Herce, Jesús ^a   Rupérez, Marta ^a   Sánchez, César ^a   García, Cristina ^a   García, Elena ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Children; Femoral arterial thermodilution technique; Pulsecontour analysis

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMORAL ARTERIAL THERMODILUTION TECHNIQUE; PULSE COUNTOUR ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGY; CORRELATION METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CARDIOLOGY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; CONTOUR PULSE ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART OUTPUT; NONHUMAN; PEDIATRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY; SWINE; THERMODILUTION; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

AGING; ANIMALS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMORAL ARTERY; MODELS, ANIMAL; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; MUSCLE, SMOOTH, VASCULAR; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULSE; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 33645765167     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-006-2229-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Morrison G. Measurement of cardiac output in children. In: J-L Vincent (ed), Year Book of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Springer, Berlin, 1995; pp. 606-614.
2. Wippermann CF, Huth RG, Schmidt FX, Thul J, Betancor M, Schranz D. Continuous measurement of cardiac output by the Fick principle in infants and children: Comparison with the thermodilution method. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 467-71.
3. Senzaki H, Chen CH, Masutani S, Taketazu M, Kobayashi T, Sasaki N, Asano Kyo S, Yokote Y. Assessment of cardiovascular dynamics by pressure - are relation in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122: 535-547.
4. Perrino AC, Lippman A, Ariyan C. Intraoperative cardiac output monitoring: Comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994; 8: 24-29.
5. Rupérez M, López-Herce J, García C, Sánchez C, García E, Vigil D. Comparison between cardiac output measured by the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique and that measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique in a pediatric animal model. Pediatr Cardiol 2004; 25: 119-23.
6. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 843-846.
7. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: Comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2407-2412.
8. Gust R, Gottschalk A, Bauer H, Böttinger BW, Böhrer H, Martin E. Cardiac output measurement by transpulmonary versus conventional thermodilution technique in intensive care patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth 1998; 12: 519-522.
9. McLuckie A, Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Anderson D. A comparison of pulmonary and femoral artery thermodilution cardiac indices in paediatric intensive care patients. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 336-8.
10. Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ, Beale R, McLuckie A, Reinhart K. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 180-187.
11. Schiffmann H, Erdlenbruch G, Singer D, Singer S, Herting E, Hoeft A. Assessment of cardiac output, intravascular volume status, and extravascular lung water by transpulmonary indicator dilution in critically ill neonates and infants. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 592-597.
12. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y, Perel A. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-989.
13. Zollner C, Haller M, Weis M, Mörstedt K, Lamm P, Kilger E, Goetz AE. Beat-to beat measurement of cardiac output by intravascular pulse contour analysis: A prospective criterion standard study in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14: 125-129.
14. Rodig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: Pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-530.
15. Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, Hanekop GG, Baryalei MM, Sydow M, Sonntag H. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 437-440.
16. Mielck F, Buhre W, Hanekop G, Tirilomis T, Hilgers R, Sonntag H. Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 211-216.
17. Mahajan A, Shabanie A, Turner J, Sopher MJ, Marijic J. Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output monitoring in cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97: 1283-1288.
18. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-311.
19. Godje O, Friedl R, Hannekum A. Accuracy of beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis in hemdynamical unstable patients. Med Sci Monit 2001; 7: 1344-1350.