Detection of intraductal component around invasive breast cancer using ultrasound: Correlation with MRI and histopathological findings

Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 108-114

  Sundararajan, Sangeetha ^a   Tohno, Eriko ^b   Kamma, Hiroshi ^c   Ueno, Ei ^b   Minami, Manabu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^c KYORIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Intraductal component; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 33645761959     PISSN: 02882043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02493276     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology, 196: 123-134, 1995.
2. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer, 76: 626-630, 1995.
3. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology, 221: 641-649, 2001.
4. Tsunoda HS, Ueno E, Tohno E, Akisada M. Echogram of ductal spreading of breast carcinoma, Jpn J Med. Ultrasonics, 17: 44-48, 1990. (in Jpse.)
5. Satake H, Shimamoto K, Sawaki A, et al. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging. Eur Radiol, 10: 1726-1732, 2000.
6. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology, 191: 625-631, 1994.
7. Bone B, Aspelin P, Bronge L, Isberg B, Perbeck L, Veress B. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts. Acta Radiol, 37: 208-213, 1996.
8. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg, 198: 190-197, 2004.
9. Holland R, Connolly JL, Gelman R, et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol, 8: 113-118, 1990.
10. Lindley R, Bulman A, Parsons P, Philips R, Henry K, Ellis H. Histologic features predictive of an increased risk of early local recurrence after treatment of breast cancer by local tumor excision and radical radiotherapy. Surgery, 105: 13-20, 1989.
11. Wu W, Kamma H, Ueno E, et al. The intraductal component of breast cancer is poorly responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncol Rep, 9: 1027-1031, 2002.
12. In General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Recording of Breast Cancer, 15th ed. (The Japanese Breast Cancer Society, Tokyo), 2005.
13. Ando Y, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Endo T, Miyazaki M. Intramammary extension of breast cancer: diagnosis with MR mammography. Breast Cancer, 5: 291-300, 1998.
14. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology, 202: 413-420, 1997.
15. Nakahara H, Namba K, Wakamatsu H, et al. Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI. Radiat Med, 20: 17-23, 2002.
16. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology, 196: 415-419, 1995.
17. Hiramatsu H, Enomoto K, Ikeda T, et al. The role of contrast enhanced high resolution MRI in the surgical planning of breast cancer. Breast Cancer, 4: 285-290, 1997.
18. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology, 197: 387-395, 1995.
19. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology, 197: 743-747, 1995.