Force generation in single conventional actomyosin complexes under high dynamic load

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1295-1307

  Takagi, Yasuharu ^a,b,e   Homsher, Earl E ^c   Goldman, Yale E ^a   Shuman, Henry ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d B400 Richards Bldg ^*  (United States)

^e NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; MYOSIN; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MYOSIN II; BIOTIN; MICROSPHERE; MOLECULAR MOTOR;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; ENERGY TRANSFER; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FORCE; HYDROLYSIS; MECHANICS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE STIFFNESS; NONHUMAN; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MICROFILAMENT; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT;

ANIMALIA;

ACTOMYOSIN; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOTIN; MICROFILAMENTS; MICROSPHERES; MOLECULAR MOTOR PROTEINS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MYOSIN TYPE II; RABBITS;

EID: 33645758327     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.068429     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Knight, A. E., C. Veigel, C. Chambers, and J. E. Molloy. 2001. Analysis of single-molecule mechanical recordings: application to actomyosin interactions. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 77:45-72.
2. Tyska, M. J., and D. M. Warshaw. 2002. The myosin power stroke. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 51:1-15.
3. Finer, J. T., R. M. Simmons, and J. A. Spudich. 1994. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps. Nature. 386:113-119.
4. Molloy, J. E., J. E. Burns, J. Kendrick-Jones, R. T. Tregear, and D. C. S. White. 1995. Movement and force produced by single myosin head. Nature. 378:209-212.
5. Guilford, W. H., D. E. Dupuis, G. Kennedy, J. Wu, J. B. Patlak, and D. M. Warshaw. 1997. Smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins produce similar forces and displacements in the laser trap. Biophys. J. 72:1006-1021.
6. Ishijima, A., H. Kojima, T. Funatsu, M. Tokunaga, H. Higuchi, H. Tanaka, and T. Yanagida. 1998. Simultaneous observation of individual ATPase and mechanical events by a single myosin molecule during interaction with actin. Cell. 92:161-171.
7. Tanaka, H., A. Ishijima, M. Honda, K. Saito, and T. Yanagida. 1998. Orientation dependence of displacements by a single one-headed myosin relative to the actin filament. Biophys. J. 75:1886-1894.
8. Baker, J. E., C. Brosseau, P. B. Joel, and D. M. Warshaw. 2002. The biochemical kinetics underlying actin movement generated by one and many skeletal muscle myosin molecules. Biophys. J. 82:2134-2147.
9. Lauzon, A.-M., M. J. Tyska, A. S. Rovner, Y. Freyzon, D. M. Warshaw, and K. M. Trybus. 1998. A 7-amino-acid insert in the heavy chain nucleotide binding loop alters the kinetics of smooth muscle myosin in the laser trap. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 19:825-837.
10. Tyska, M. J., D. E. Dupuis, W. H. Guilford, J. B. Patlak, G. S. Waller, K. M. Trybus, D. M. Warshaw, and S. Lowey. 1999. Two heads of myosin are better than one for generating force and motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:4402-4407.
11. Molloy, J. E., J. Kendrick-Jones, C. Veigel, and R. T. Tregear. 2000. An unexpectedly large working stroke from chymotryptic fragments of myosin II. FEBS Lett. 480:293-297.
12. Warshaw, D. M., W. H. Guilford, Y. Freyzon, E. Krementsova, K. A. Palmiter, M. J. Tyska, J. E. Baker, and K. M. Trybus. 2000. The light chain binding domain of expressed smooth muscle heavy meromyosin acts as a mechanical lever. J. Biol. Chem. 275:37167-37172.
13. Purcell, T. J., C. Morris, J. A. Spudich, and H. L. Sweeney. 2002. Role of the lever arm in the processive stepping of myosin V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:14159-14164.
14. Sakamoto, T., F. Wang, S. Schmitz, Y. Xu, Q. Xu, J. E. Molloy, C. Veigel, and J. R. Sellers. 2003. Neck length and processivity of myosin V. J. Biol. Chem. 278:29201-29207.
15. Mehta, A. D., R. S. Rock, M. Rief, J. A. Spudich, M. S. Mooseker, and R. E. Cheney. 1999. Myosin-V is a processive actin-based motor. Nature. 400:590-593.
16. Rief, M., R. S. Rock, A. D. Mehta, M. S. Mooseker, R. E. Cheney, and J. A. Spudich. 2000. Myosin-V stepping kinetics: a molecular model for processivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:9482-9486.
17. Veigel, C., F. Wang, M. L. Bartoo, J. R. Sellers, and J. E. Molloy. 2002. The gated gait of the processive molecular motor, myosin V. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:59-65.
18. Veigel, C., J. E. Molloy, S. Schmitz, and J. Kendrick-Jones. 2003. Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:980-986.
19. Finer, J. T., A. D. Mehta, and J. A. Spudich. 1995. Characterization of single actin-myosin interactions. Biophys. J. 68:291S-296S.
20. Molloy, J. E., J. E. Burns, J. C. Sparrow, R. T. Tregear, J. Kendrick-Jones, and D. C. S. White. 1995. Single-molecule mechanics of heavy meromyosin and S1 interacting with rabbit or Drosophila actins using optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 68:298S-303S.
21. Woledge, R. C., N. A. Curtin, and E. Homsher. 1985. Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. Monogr. Physiol. Soc. 41:1-357.
22. Cooke, R. 1997. Actomyosin interaction in striated muscle. Physiol. Rev. 77:671-697.
23. Howard, J. 2001. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
24. Dupuis, D. E., W. H. Guilford, J. Wu, and D. M. Warshaw. 1997. Actin filament mechanics in the laser trap. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 18:17-30.
25. Veigel, C., M. L. Bartoo, D. C. S. White, J. C. Sparrow, and J. E. Molloy. 1998. The stiffness of rabbit skeletal actomyosin cross-bridges determined with an optical tweezers transducer. Biophys. J. 75:1424-1438.
26. Fenn, W. O. 1923. A quantitative comparison between the energy liberated and the work performed by the isolated sartorius muscle of the frog. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 58:175-203.
27. Huxley, A. F. 1957. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 7:255-318.
28. De La Cruz, E. M., A. L. Wells, S. S. Rosenfeld, E. M. Ostap, and H. L. Sweeney. 1999. The kinetic mechanism of myosin V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:13726-13731.
29. Veigel, C., L. M. Coluccio, J. D. Jontes, J. C. Sparrow, R. A. Milligan, and J. E. Molloy. 1999. The motor protein myosin-I produces its working stroke in two steps. Nature. 398:530-533.
30. Nyitrai, M., and M. A. Geeves. 2004. Adenosine diphosphate and strain sensitivity in myosin motors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359:1867-1877.
31. Uyeda, T. Q. P., S. J. Kron, and J. A. Spudich. 1990. Myosin step size. Estimation from slow sliding movement of actin over low densities of heavy meromyosin. J. Mol. Biol. 214:699-710.
32. Harris, D. E., and D. M. Warshaw. 1993. Smooth and skeletal muscle myosin both exhibit low duty cycles at zero load in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 268:14764-14768.
33. Hopkins, S. C., C. Sabido-David, J. E. T. Corrie, M. Irving, and Y. E. Goldman. 1998. Fluorescence polarization transients from rhodamine isomers on the myosin regulatory light chain in skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys. J. 74:3093-3110.
34. De La Cruz, E. M., and E. M. Ostap. 2004. Relating biochemistry and function in the myosin superfamily. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:61-67.
35. Dantzig, J. A., M. G. Hibberd, D. R. Trentham, and Y. E. Goldman. 1991. Cross-bridge kinetics in the presence of MgADP investigated by photolysis of caged ATP in rabbit psoas muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 432:639-680.
36. Gollub, J., C. R. Cremo, and R. Cooke. 1996. ADP release produces a rotation of the neck region of smooth myosin but not skeletal myosin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:796-802.
37. Takagi, Y., Y. E. Goldman, and H. Shuman. 2000. Single molecule force of myosin II measured with a novel optical trap system that eliminates linkage compliance. Biophys. J. 78:235a. (Abstr.).
38. Takagi, Y., E. E. Homsher, Y. E. Goldman, and H. Shuman. 2001. Analysis of isometric force measurements of myosin II using a modified mean-variance analysis. Biophys. J. 80:78a. (Abstr.).
39. Takagi, Y., E. E. Homsher, Y. E. Goldman, and H. Shuman. 2002. Probing the transduction mechanism of rabbit skeletal myosin II underisometric condition using an optical trap. Biophys. J. 82:373a. (Abstr.).
40. Takagi, Y., Y. E. Goldman, and H. Shuman. 2003. Mechanics of rabbit skeletal actomyosin in an isometric force clamp near rigor. Biophys. J. 84:247a. (Abstr.).
41. Takagi, Y., E. E. Homsher, Y. E. Goldman, and H. Shuman. 2004. ATP and phosphate dependence of single rabbit skeletal actomyosin interactions under differing loads. Biophys. J. 86:54a. (Abstr.).
42. Takagi, Y., Y. E. Goldman, and H. Shuman. 2005. A Markov process model to predict the mechanics and kinetics of single rabbit skeletal isometric actomyosin interactions. Biophys. J. 88:634a. (Abstr.).
43. Visscher, K., S. P. Gross, and S. M. Block. 1996. Construction of multiple-beam optical traps with nanometer-resolution position sensing. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quant. Electr. 2:1066-1076.
44. Smith, S. B., Y. Cui, and C. Bustamante. 1996. Overstretching B-DNA: the elastic response of individual double-stranded and singlestranded DNA molecules. Science. 271:795-799.
45. Block, S. M., L. S. Goldstein, and B. J. Schnapp. 1990. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers. Nature. 348:348-352.
46. Gittes, F., and C. F. Schmidt. 1998. Signals and noise in micromechanical measurements. Methods Cell Biol. 55:129-156.
47. Allersma, M. W., F. Gittes, M. J. deCastro, R. J. Stewart, and C. F. Schmidt. 1998. Two-dimensional tracking of ncd motility by back focal plane interferometry. Biophys. J. 74:1074-1085.
48. Simmons, R. M., J. T. Finer, S. Chu, and J. A. Spudich. 1996. Quantitative measurements of forces and displacement using an optical trap. Biophys. J. 70:1813-1822.
49. Margossian, S. S., and S. Lowey. 1982. Preparation of myosin and its subfragments from rabbit skeletal muscle. Methods Enzymol. 85:55-71.
50. Harada, Y., K. Sakurada, T. Aoki, D. D. Thomas, and T. Yanagida. 1990. Mechanochemical coupling in actomyosin energy transduction studied by in vitro movement assay. J. Mol. Biol. 216:49-68.
51. Pardee, J. D., and J. A. Spudich. 1982. Purification of muscle actin. Methods Cell Biol. 24:271-289.
52. MacLean-Fletcher, S., and T. D. Pollard. 1980. Identification of a factor in conventional muscle actin preparations which inhibits actin filament self-association. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 96:18-27.
53. Rock, R. S., M. Rief, A. D. Mehta, and J. A. Spudich. 2000. In vitro assays of processive myosin motors. Methods. 22:373-381.
54. Svoboda, K., and S. M. Block. 1994. Biological applications of optical forces. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23:247-285.
55. Mehta, A. D., J. T. Finer, and J. A. Spudich. 1997. Detection of singlemolecule interactions using correlated thermal diffusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:7927-7931.
56. Piazzesi, G., L. Lucii, and V. Lombardi. 2002. The size and the speed of the working stroke of muscle myosin and its dependence on the force. J. Physiol. 545:145-151.
57. Nishizaka, T., H. Miyata, H. Yoshikawa, S. Ishiwata, and K. Kinosita Jr. 1995. Unbinding force of a single motor molecule of muscle measured using optical tweezers. Nature. 377:251-254.
58. Nishizaka, T., R. Seo, H. Tadakuma, K. Kinosita Jr., and S. Ishiwata. 2000. Characterization of single actomyosin rigor bonds: load dependence of lifetime and mechanical properties. Biophys. J. 79:962-974.
59. Huxley, A. F., and S. Tideswell. 1996. Filament compliance and tension transients in muscle. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 17:507-511.
60. Barclay, C. J. 1998. Estimation of cross-bridge stiffness from maximum thermodynamic efficiency. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 19:855-864.
61. Kushmerick, M. J., and R. E. Davies. 1969. The chemical energetics of muscle contraction. II. The chemistry, efficiency and power of maximally working sartorius muscles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 174:315-353.
62. Hibberd, M. G., J. A. Dantzig, D. R. Trentham, and Y. E. Goldman. 1985. Phosphate release and force generation in skeletal muscle fibers. Science. 228:1317-1319.
63. Matsubara, I., and G. F. Elliott. 1972. X-ray diffraction studies on skinned single fibres of frog skeletal muscle. J. Mol. Biol. 72:657-669.
64. Cooke, R., M. S. Crowder, and D. D. Thomas. 1982. Orientation of spin labels attached to cross-bridges in contracting muscle fibres. Nature. 300:776-778.
65. Huxley, A. F. 2000. Cross-bridge action: present views, prospects, and unknowns. J. Biomech. 33:1189-1195.
66. White, H. D., and E. W. Taylor. 1976. Energetics and mechanism of actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase. Biochemistry. 15:5818-5826.
67. Goldman, Y. E. 1987. Kinetics of the actomyosin ATPase in muscle fibers. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 49:637-654.
68. Bell, G. I. 1978. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science. 200:618-627.
69. Eisenberg, E., T. L. Hill, and Y. Chen. 1980. Cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Quantitative analysis. Biophys. J. 29:195-227.
70. Steffen, W., D. Smith, R. Simmons, and J. Sleep. 2001. Mapping the actin filament with myosin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:14949-14954.
71. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. 1992. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press, New York.