Use of multifocal visual evoked potential tests in the objective evaluation of the visual field in pediatric epilepsy surgery

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 104 PEDIATRICS, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2006, Pages 160-165

  Kim, Yeong Jin ^a   Yukawa, Eiichi ^a   Kawasaki, Kensuke ^a   Nakase, Hiroyuki ^a   Sakaki, Toshisuke ^a  

^a NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Epilepsy surgery; Multifocal visual evoked potential; Pediatric neurosurgery; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; EPILEPSY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EPILEPSY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33645736982     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 00223085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/ped.2006.104.3.160     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Balachandran C, Klistorner AI, Billson F: Multifocal VEP in children: its maturation and clinical application. Br J Ophthalmol 88:226-232, 2004
2. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T: The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90:65-81, 1994
3. Betsuin Y, Mashima Y, Ohde H, Inoue R, Oguchi Y: Clinical application of the multifocal VEPs. Curr Eye Res 22:54-63, 2001
4. Graham SL, Klistorner A, Grigg JR, Billson FA: Objective perimetry in glaucoma: recent advances with multifocal stimuli. Surv Ophthalmol 43:S199-S209, 1999
5. Harding GF, Spencer EL, Wild JM, Conway M, Bohn RL: Field-specific visual-evoked potentials: identifying field defects in vigabatrin-treated children. Neurology 58:1261-1265, 2002
6. Hasegawa S, Abe H: Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 3341-3348, 2001
7. Kardon RH, Kirkali PA, Thompson HS: Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. Ophthalmology 98:485-496, 1991
8. Kiyosawa M, Mizuno K, Hatazawa J, Fukuda H, Yamada K, Ito M, et al: Metabolic imaging in hemianopsia using positron emission tomography with 18F-deoxyfluoroglucose. Am J Ophthalmol 101:310-319, 1986
9. Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA: Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:937-950, 1998
10. Kuzniecky R, Gilliam F, Morawetz R, Faught E, Palmer C, Black L: Occipital lobe developmental malformations and epilepsy: clinical spectrum, treatment, and outcome. Epilepsia 38: 175-181, 1997
11. Miki A, Nakajima T, Fujita M, Takagi M, Abe H: Functional magnetic resonance imaging in homonymous hemianopsia. Am J Ophthalmol 121:258-266, 1996
12. Palmini A, Andermann F, Dubeau F, Gloor P, Olivier A, Quesney LF, et al: Occipitotemporal epilepsies: evaluation of selected patients requiring depth electrodes studies and rationale for surgical approaches. Epilepsia 34:84-96, 1993
13. Spencer EL, Harding GF: Examining visual field defects in the paediatric population exposed to vigabatrin. Doc Ophthalmol 107:281-287, 2003
14. Yukawa E, Kim YJ, Kawasaki K, Taketani F, Hara Y: A child with epilepsy in whom multifocal VEPs facilitated the objective measurement of the visual field. Epilepsia 46:577-579, 2005