Inversion of elongated magnetic anomalies using magnitude transforms

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 153-166

  Stavrev, Petar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND GEOLOGY   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; MAPS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ANOMALOUS MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC MAPS; MAGNETIC PROFILES; MAGNITUDE TRANSFORMS; SOURCE DEPTH; STRUCTURAL INDEX;

MAGNETIC FIELDS;

DATA INVERSION; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIC METHOD; MAGNETIC SURVEY;

EID: 33645733868     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: 13652478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00528.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gunn P.J. 1975. Linear transformations of gravity and magnetic fields. Geophysical. Prospecting 23, 300-312.
2. Hansen R.O. and Simmonds M. 1993. Multiple-source Werner deconvolution. Geophysics 58, 1792-1800.
3. Hartman R.R., Teskey B.J. and Friedberg J.L. 1971. A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation. Geophysics 36, 891-918.
4. Moreau F., Gibert D., Holschneider M. and Saracco G. 1997. Wavelet analysis of potential fields. Inverse Problems 13, 165-178.
5. Nabighian M.N. 1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37, 507-517.
6. Nabighian M.N. and Hansen R.O. 2001. Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalized Hilbert transform. Geophysics 66, 1805-1810.
7. Naudy H. 1971. Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profiles. Geophysics 36, 717-722.
8. Reid A.B., Allsop J.M., Granser H., Millet A.J. and Somerton I.W. 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55, 80-91.
9. Roest W.R., Verhoef J. and Pilkington M. 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57, 116-125.
10. Stavrev P. 2001. A technique for inversion of 2D magnetic anomalies represented by their magnitudes. 63rd EAGE Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Extended Abstracts 2, P230.
11. Stavrev P. and Gerovska D. 2000. Magnetic field transforms with low sensitivity to the direction of source magnetization and high centricity. Geophysical Prospecting 48, 317-340.
12. Telford W.M., Geldart L.P. and Sheriff R.E. 1990. Applied Geophysics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
13. Thompson D.T. 1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47, 31-37.
14. Thurston J.B. and Smith R.S. 1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI™ method. Geophysics 62, 807-813.
15. Tyapkin K.F. 1973. Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies Caused by Dikes and Contacts. Nedra. (In Russian).
16. Vallee M.A., Keating P., Smith R.S. and St-Hilaire C. 2004. Estimating depth and model type using continuous wavelet transform of magnetic data. Geophysics 69, 191-199.