Cost-effective school inputs: Is class size reduction the best educational expenditure for Florida?

Educational Policy

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 429-454

  Normore, Anthony H ^a   Ilon, Lynn ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Class size reduction; Cost effectiveness; Educational expenditures; Florida

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645684017     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904805284053     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Borman, G., & Hewes, G. (2002). The long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of Success for All. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24 (4). 243-266.
2. Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Stecher, B. M. (2002). What we have learned about class size reduction in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
3. Bracey, G. (1995). Debunking the myths about money for schools. Educational Leadership, 53 (3). 65-69.
4. Bracey, G., & Stellar, A. (2003). Long-term studies of preschool: Lasting benefits far outweigh costs. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 780.
5. Brewer, D., Krop, C., Gill, B. P., & Reichardt, R. (1999). Estimating the costs of national class size reductions under different policy alternatives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21 (2). 1179-1192.
6. Canedy, D. (2003, February 11). Florida struggles to find a way to achieve smaller classes. The New York Times, p. 18.
7. Correa, H. (1993). An economic analysis of class size and achievement in education. Education Economics, 1 (2). 129-135.
8. CSR Research Consortium (1999). Class size reduction in California 1996-98: Early findings signal concern and promise. Retrieved November 5, 2004, from http://classsize.org/summary/96-98/index.htm
9. Egelson, P., Harman, P., Hood, A., & Achilles, C. M. (2002). How class size makes a difference. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Regional Educational Laboratory, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
10. Ferguson, R., & Ladd, H. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265-298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97-110.
12. Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103 (2). 145-183.
13. Florida's class size amendment. (2004). Retrieved November 8, 2004, from http://firn.edu/doe/arm/class-size.htm
14. Florida Department of Education (2002a). Guide to calculations for the Florida school indicators report, 2001-02. Retrieved November 14, 2005, from http://www.firn.edu/doe/eias/eiaspubs/pdf/fsir0002.pdf
15. Florida Department of Education. (2002b). Online Florida indicators report. Retrieved November 14, 2005, from http://info.doe.state.fl.us/fsir2002/ indicator_desc.cfm
16. Florida's E-Budget. (2003). Education: Governor's priorities. Available from http://www.ebudget.state.fl.us
17. Gerber, S. B., Finn, J. D., Achilles, C. M., Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). Teacher aides and students' academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 123-144.
18. Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1978). Meta-analysis of research on the relationship of class size and achievement. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
19. Greenwald, L., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66 (3). 361-396.
20. Grissmer, D., Flanagan, A., Kawata, J., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us. Arlington, VA: RAND.
21. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
22. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Applying performance incentives to schools for disadvantaged population. Education and Urban Society, 29, 296-316.
23. Hanushek, E. A. (1998). The evidence on class size. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester, W. Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy.
24. Hanushek, E.A. (1999a). The evidence on class size. In S.E. Mayer & P. Peterson (Eds.), Earning and learning: How schools matter (pp. 131-168). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
25. Hanushek, E. A. (1999b). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19 (2). 141-164.
26. Hanushek, E. A. (2002). Evidence, politics, and class size debate. In L. Mishel & R. Rothstein (Eds.), The class size debate (pp. 27-45). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
27. Harder, H. (1990). A critical look at reduced class size. Contemporary Education, 62, 28-30.
28. Haynes, M. (2003). Class size reduction data collection (Technical Assistance Paper FY2003-01). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education, Bureau of Education Information and Accountability. Available from http://www.firn.edu/doe/eias/dataweb/tech/classize0304.pdf
29. Hazzard, J. (1989, November 22). Reducing class size: Affordable? Efficient? Education Week, p. 21.
30. Hedges, L., Laine, R., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
31. Hertling, E., Leonard, C., Lumsden, L., & Smith, S. C. (2000). Class size: Policy report. Reporting on policy issues in K-12. Educational Management, 1, 1-20.
32. Horne, J. (2003). Implementation of class size reduction requirements. Memorandum from the Commissioner of Education's office, Florida Department of Education, Tallahassee.
33. Kennedy, M. (2003). Sizing up smaller classes. American School and University. Available from http://asumag.com/mag/ university_sizing_smaller_classes/
34. Krueger, A. B. (2002). Understanding the magnitude and effect of class size on student achievement. In L. Mishel & R. Rothstein (Eds.), The class size debate (pp. 7-26). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
35. Masse, L. N., & Barnett, W. S. (2002). Benefit cost analysis of the Abecedarian Early Childhood Intervention Project. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Childhood Research, Rutgers University.
36. McIntyre, W. G., & Scott, M. F. (1989). The relationship of class size to student achievement: What the research says (Occasional Paper Series No. 3). Orono: University of Maine, Orono College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED323643)
37. McRobbie, J., Finn, J. D., & Harman, P. (2004). Class size reduction: Lessons learned from experience. Policy Brief, 23, 1-16.
38. Meisels, S. (2003, March 19). Can Head Start pass the test? Education Week, p. 44.
39. Molnar, A., & Achilles, C. (2000). Voucher and class size research. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Education Research, Analysis, and Innovation.
40. Neas, R., & Keenan, N. (2003). Vouchers and the hidden agenda. Washington, DC: People for the American Way Foundation.
41. Odden, A., & Archibald, S. (2001). Committing to class-size reduction and finding the resources to implement it: A case study of resource reallocation. Educational Policy Archive Analysis, 9 (30). Available from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n30.html
42. Okpala, C. O. (2002). Educational resources, student demographics, and achievement scores. Journal of Education Finance, 27 (3). 885-907.
43. Pate-Bain, H., Fulton, B. D., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (1999). Effects of class size reduction in the early grades (K-3) on high school performance: Preliminary results (1999) from Project STAR, Tennessee's longitudinal class size study. Nashville, TN: Health and Education Research Operatives Services.
44. Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development, 22 (9). 1325-1343.
45. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2002). Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago child-parent centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24 (4). 267-303.
46. Schwartz, W. (2003). Class size reduction and urban students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
47. Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., Weikart, D. P. (1993). The High/Scope Perry preschool study through age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope.
48. Slavin, R. (1989). Class size and student achievement: Small effects of small classes. Educational Psychologist, 24 (1). 99-110.
49. Slavin, R. (1990). Class size and student achievement: Is smaller better? Contemporary Education, 62 (1). 6-12.
50. Smith, H. (1971). Class size: Does it make a difference? Review of the Research. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
51. Stern, D. (1987, April). Teachers' salaries, class size, and student achievement in Grades 3 and 6: Some new evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED288241)
52. Tomlinson, T. (1988). Class size and public policy: Politics and panaceas. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
53. Tomlinson, T. (1990). Class size and public policy: The plot thickens. Contemporary Education, 62 (1). 17-23.
54. Viadero, D. (2000a, October 18). Wisconsin researchers question findings on class size. Education Week, p. 8.
55. Viadero, D. (2000b, October 25). Study links smaller classes to higher earnings. Education Week. Retrieved November 15, 2005, from http://www.edweek. org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=08class.n20
56. Wagner, K. (2001). Class size policy. Retrieved November 15, 2005, from http:///www.saee.ca/analyst/c_a2.4_BB2.php
57. Weaver-Dunne, D. (2000). School issues article: Florida fails children of Miami-Dade County. Education World, Copyright 2002. Retrieved November 11, 2003, from http://www.education-world.com/a_issues/issues107.html
58. Wenglinsky, H. H. (1997). How money matters: The effect of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 221-237.
59. Witte, J. (1999). Evaluation reports: Cost-benefit issues and implications of reducing class size in public schools. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Available from www.ncrel.org/re/eval/ costben/costben.html