Allchin's errors and misrepresentations and the H-D nature of science

Science Education

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 289-291

  Lawson, Anton E ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645654964     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20094     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Allchin, D. (1993). Reassessing van Helmont, reassessing history. BioScene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 19, 3-5.
2. Allchin, D. (1995). How not to teach history in science. In F. Finley, D. Allchin, D. Rhees, & S. Fifield (Eds.), Proceedings, Third International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 13-22). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
3. Allchin, D. (2000a). How not to teach historical cases in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 33-37.
4. Allchin, D. (2000b). Mending Mendelism. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 632-639.
5. Allchin, D. (2002). How not to teach history in science. The Pantaneto Forum URL: www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue7/allchin.htm.
6. Allchin, D. (2003a). Scientific myth-conceptions. Science Education, 87, 329-351.
7. Allchin, D. (2003b). Lawson's shoehorn, or should the philosophy of science be rated X? Science & Education, 12, 315-329.
8. Allchin, D. (2004). Pseudohistory and pseudoscience. Science & Education, 13, 179-195.
9. Allchin, D. (2005). William Harvey and capillaries. The American Biology Teacher, 67, 56-59.
10. Azimov, I. (1964). A short history of biology. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
11. Baumel, H. B., & Berger, J. J. (1973). Biology: Its people and its papers. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
12. Doby, T. (1963). Discoverers of blood circulation: From Aristotile to the times of Da Vinci and Harvey. London: Abelard - Schuman.
13. Harvey, W. (1628). On the motion of the heart and blood in animals (R. Willis, Trans.). In C.W. Eliot (Ed). Harvard classics: Scientific papers (Vol. 38). New York: P. F. Collier & Sons, 1897.
14. Hershey, D. R. (2003). Misconceptions about Helmont's willow experiment. Plant Science Bulletin, 49, 78-84.
15. Hershey, D. R. (in press). Pseudohistory and pseudoscience: Allchin's historical, conceptual and educational mistakes. Science & Education.
16. Lawson, A. E. (2000). The generality of the hypothetico-deductive method: Making scientific thinking explicit. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 482-495.
17. Lawson, A. E. (2003). Allchin's shoehorn, or why science is hypothetico-deductive. Science & Education, 12, 331-337.
18. Lewis, R. W. (1988). Biology: A hypothetico-deductive science. The American Biology Teacher, 50, 362-366.
19. Westerland, J., & Fairbanks, D. (2004). Gregor Mendel and "myth-conceptions." Science Education, 88, 754-758.
20. Wivagg, D., & Allchin, D. (2002). The dogma of "the" scientific method. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 484-485.