The dogma of "The" scientific method

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 64, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 645-646

  Wivagg, Dan ^a   Allchin, Douglas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036862846     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/0002-7685(2002)064[0645:tdotsm]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Allen, G.E. (1978). Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Anand, P. (2002). Decision-making when science is ambiguous. Science, 295, 1839.
3. Bauer, H.H. (1992), Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
4. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Di Trocchio, F. (1991). Mendel's experiments: a reinterpretation. Journal of tee History of Biology, 24, 485-519.
6. Einstein, A. (1954). Ideas and Opinions, New York: Dell.
7. Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. (2002). Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science, 296, 707-711.
8. Hagen, J.B., Allchin, D. & Singer, F. (1996). Doing Biology, Glenview, IL: Harper Collins.
9. Holmes, F.L. (2001). Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: A History of 'The Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology': New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1984). The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
11. Mayr, E. (1991). One Long Argument. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Medawar, P. (1964). Is the scientific report fraudulent? Yes: It misrepresents scientific thought. Saturday Review, 47(August 1, 1964), 42-43.
13. Tanzi, R.E. & Parson, A.B. (2000). Decoding Darkness. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
14. Watson, J.D. (1968). The Double Helix. New York: Atheneum.
15. Weiner, J. (1994). The Beak of the Finch. New York: Vintage Books.