메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 543-551

Education techniques for lifelong learning: Writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDUCATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGY; REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; WRITING;

EID: 33645573873     PISSN: 15271323     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.262055145     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (93)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 0024762338 scopus 로고
    • The multiple choice test: Writing the questions
    • Farley JK. The multiple choice test: writing the questions. Nurse Educ 1989;14:10-12, 39.
    • (1989) Nurse Educ , vol.14 , pp. 10-12
    • Farley, J.K.1
  • 2
    • 33645573857 scopus 로고
    • Developing evaluation instruments
    • New York, NY: MacMillan College Publishing
    • Kemp JE, Morrison GR, Ross SM. Developing evaluation instruments. In: Designing effective instruction. New York, NY: MacMillan College Publishing, 1994; 180-213.
    • (1994) Designing Effective Instruction , pp. 180-213
    • Kemp, J.E.1    Morrison, G.R.2    Ross, S.M.3
  • 7
    • 84858582748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accessed January 18
    • American Board of Radiology. Diagnostic radiology MOC requirements. Available at: http:www.theabr.org/DR_MOC_Req.htm. Accessed January 18, 2006.
    • (2006) Diagnostic Radiology MOC Requirements
  • 9
    • 0031448943 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A brief guide to writing better test questions
    • Braddom CL. A brief guide to writing better test questions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997;76:514-516.
    • (1997) Am J Phys Med Rehabil , vol.76 , pp. 514-516
    • Braddom, C.L.1
  • 10
    • 0018229667 scopus 로고
    • How to write good multiple choice questions
    • Cox KR, Bandaranayake R. How to write good multiple choice questions. Med J Aust 1978;2:553-554.
    • (1978) Med J Aust , vol.2 , pp. 553-554
    • Cox, K.R.1    Bandaranayake, R.2
  • 13
    • 0032533374 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Writing cognitive educational objectives and multiple-choice test questions
    • Schultheis NM. Writing cognitive educational objectives and multiple-choice test questions. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1998;55:2397-2401.
    • (1998) Am J Health Syst Pharm , vol.55 , pp. 2397-2401
    • Schultheis, N.M.1
  • 15
    • 0023000728 scopus 로고
    • Guidelines for writing multiple-choice questions in radiology courses
    • Vydareny KH, Blane CE, Calhoun JG. Guidelines for writing multiple-choice questions in radiology courses. Invest Radiol 1986;21:871-876.
    • (1986) Invest Radiol , vol.21 , pp. 871-876
    • Vydareny, K.H.1    Blane, C.E.2    Calhoun, J.G.3
  • 18
    • 0024398672 scopus 로고
    • Multiple choice questions: How to construct and how to evaluate?
    • Srinivasa DK, Adkoli BV. Multiple choice questions: how to construct and how to evaluate? Indian J Pediatr 1989;56:69-74.
    • (1989) Indian J Pediatr , vol.56 , pp. 69-74
    • Srinivasa, D.K.1    Adkoli, B.V.2
  • 20
    • 33645566056 scopus 로고
    • Multiple-choice and matching tests
    • San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass
    • Davis BG. Multiple-choice and matching tests. In: Tools for teaching. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass, 1993; 262-271.
    • (1993) Tools for Teaching , pp. 262-271
    • Davis, B.G.1
  • 22
    • 84959957900 scopus 로고
    • Item type and cognitive ability measured: The validity evidence for multiple true-false items in medical specialty certification
    • Downing SM, Baranowski RA, Grosso LJ, Norcini JJ. Item type and cognitive ability measured: the validity evidence for multiple true-false items in medical specialty certification. Appl Meas Educ 1995;8:189-199.
    • (1995) Appl Meas Educ , vol.8 , pp. 189-199
    • Downing, S.M.1    Baranowski, R.A.2    Grosso, L.J.3    Norcini, J.J.4
  • 23
    • 4544290592 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Different written assessment methods: What can be said about their strengths and weaknesses?
    • Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med Educ 2004;38:974-979.
    • (2004) Med Educ , vol.38 , pp. 974-979
    • Schuwirth, L.W.1    Van Der Vleuten, C.P.2
  • 24
    • 0002061929 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications
    • van der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1996;1:41-67.
    • (1996) Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract , vol.1 , pp. 41-67
    • Van Der Vleuten, C.P.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.