Electronic monitoring: Positive intervention strategies

Federal Probation

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-25

  Gable, Ralph Kirkland ^a   Gable, Robert S ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645561721     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Akers, R. L. and Sellers, C. (2004). Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application (4th edit). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Co.
2. Attewell, J., and Savill-Smith, C. (2004). Mobile learning and social inclusion: Focusing on learners and learning. In J. Attewell and C. Savill-Smith (eds.) Learning with Mobile Devices (pp. 3-10). London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
3. Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., and Rooney, J. (1999). Electronic Monitoring in Canada. Ottawa: Solicitor General's Office, Public Works and Government Services (Cat No. JS4-1/1999-01).
4. Cohn, A. W. (2003). Chicken Little says the sky may be falling! Journal of Offender Monitoring 16(2): 2-4.
5. Connelly, L. (1999, Oct.13). Implementing effective offender supervision practices and programming: Electronic monitoring. (Handout materials for an APPA audio conference). Lexington, KY: American Probation and Parole Assn.
6. Crowe, A. H., Sydney, L., Bancroft, P., and Lawrence, B. (2002). Offender Supervision with Electronic Technology. Lexington, KY: American Probation and Parole Assn.
7. Cullen, F. T., and Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: Reconsidering the nothing works debate. In L. Goodstein and D. MacKenzie (eds.), American Prisons: Issues in Research and Policy (pp. 23-44). New York, NY: Plenum.
8. Erez, E., and Ibarra, P. R. (2004). Electronic monitoring of domestic violence cases-A study of two bilateral programs. Federal Probation 68(1): 15-20.
9. Erwin, B. (1990). Old and new tools for the modern probation officer. Crime and Delinquency 36(1): 61-75.
10. Finn, M. A., and Muirhead-Steves, S. (2002). The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees. Justice Quarterly 19(2); 293-312.
11. Ford, D., and Schmidt, A. K. (1985, November). Electronically monitored home confinement. NIJ (National Institute of Justice) Reports, 2-6.
12. Gable, R. K. (1986). Application of personal telemonitoring to current problems in corrections. Journal of Criminal Justice 14: 167-176.
13. Glaser, D., and Watts, R. (1992). Electronic monitoring of offenders on probation. Judicature 76(3): 112-117.
14. Harvard Law Review (1966). Anthropotelemetry: Dr. Schwitzgebel's machine. 80: 403-421.
15. th International Training Course. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. Online: http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/ pdf/PDF_rms/no57/57-21.pdf.
16. Jackson, J. L., DeKeijser, J. W., and Michon, J. A. (1995). A critical look at research on alternatives to custody. Federal Probation 59(3): 43-51.
17. John Howard Society (2000). Electronic Monitoring. Edmonton, Alberta: John Howard Society of Alberta. Online: http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/PUB/A3.htm.
18. Jones, A. (2005). A tagging tale: The work of the monitoring officer, electronically monitoring offenders in England and Wales. Surveillance & Society 2(4): 581-588.
19. Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., Curry, G. D., and McMullen, J. (1993). Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: A seven-year study of the home confinement alternative. Crime and Delinquency 39(4): 462-484.
20. MacKenzie, D. L., and De Li, S. (2002). The impact of formal and informal social controls on the criminal activities of probationers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 19(3): 243-276.
21. Mainprize, S. (1996). Elective affinities in the engineering of social control: The evolution of electronic monitoring. Electronic Journal of Sociology. Online: http://collection.nic-bnc.ca/100/201/300/ejofsociology/2003/ v07n03/mainprize.html.
22. National Probation Service (2005). Total electronic monitoring caseloads and latest monthly new starts as at 28 February 2005. Online: http//www.probation.homeoffice.gov.uk/output/Page137asp#Statistics.
23. Papy, J., and Nimer, R. (1991). Electronic monitoring in Florida. Federal Probation 55(1): 31-33.
24. Petersilia, J., and Turner, S. (1992). An evaluation of intensive probation in California Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 82(3): 610-658.
25. Renzema, M., and Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005, in press). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology 1: 1-23.
26. Re-Entry Policy Council (2004). Charting the Safe and Successful Return of Prisoners to the Community. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
27. Roy, S. (1997). Five years of electronic monitoring of adults and juveniles in Lake County, Indiana: A comparative study on factors related to failure. Journal of Crime and Justice 20(1): 141-160.
28. San Mateo County (2005). ElectronicMonitoring Program. Sheriffs Office, Custody Division, San Mateo County (CA). Online: http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/ smc/department/home/0,14095463_1413204.
29. Schmidt, A. K. (1988). The Use of Electronic Monitoring by Criminal Justice Agencies. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice [22 page report].
30. Schwitzgebel, R. K. (1965). Streetcorner Research: An Experimental Approach to the Juvenile Delinquent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Schwitzgebel, R. K., Schwitzgebel, R. L., Pahnke, W. N, and Hurd, W. S. (1964). A program of research in behavioral electronics. Behavioral Science 9(3): 233-238.
32. Schwitzgebel, R. L. (1969, April). A belt from big brother. Psychology Today 2: 45-47.
33. Schwitzgebel, R. L., and Bird, R. M. (1970). Sociotechnical design factors in remote instrumentation with humans in natural environments. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 2(3): 99-105.
34. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
35. Smith, P., Goggin, C., and Gendreau, P. (2002). The Effects of Prison Sentences and Intermediate Sanctions on Recidivism: General Effects and Individual Differences. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services, Solicitor General's office (Cat No. JS42-103/2002) [47 page report].
36. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Online (2005). Persons under jail supervision (Table 6.14, year 2003). Online: http://www.albany.edu/ sourcebook/wkl/t614.wkl.
37. Sugg, D., Moore, L., and Howard, P. (2001). Electronic monitoring and offending behaviour - reconviction results for the second year of trials of curfew orders. Findings #141. London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office.
38. Wilson, J., and Howell J. C. (1993). A Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent and Chronic Juvenile Offenders. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.