Effect of temporary abdominal closure on colonic anastomosis and postoperative adhesions in experimental secondary peritonitis

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 612-619

  Aydin, Cagatay ^a   Aytekin, Faruk O ^a   Tekin, Koray ^a   Kabay, Burhan ^a   Yenisey, Cigdem ^b   Kocbil, Goksel ^a   Ozden, Akin ^a  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYPROLINE;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADHESION; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL PERITONITIS; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CECUM; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; LAPAROTOMY; LIGATION; NONHUMAN; RAT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ABDOMEN; ADHESIONS; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; COLON; HYDROXYPROLINE; PERITONEUM; PERITONITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; REOPERATION; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33645555970     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0511-1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Wittmann DH, Schein M, Condon RE. Management of secondary peritonitis. Ann Surg 1996;224:10.
2. Koperna T. Surgical management of severe secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg 2000;87:378.
3. Lamme B, Boermeester MA, Belt EJ, et al. Mortality and morbidity of planned relaparotomy versus relaparotomy on demand for secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1046.
4. Koperna T, Schulz F. Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection. World J Surg 2000;24:32.
5. Hutchins RR, Gunning MP, Lucas DN, et al. Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery. World J Surg 2004;28:137.
6. Rutherford EJ, Skeete DA, Brasel KJ.. Management of the patient with an open abdomen: techniques in temporary and definitive closure. Curr Probl Surg 2004;41:815.
7. Mattox KL.. Introduction, background, and future projections of damage control surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:753.
8. Tremblay LN, Feliciano DV, Schmidt J, et al. Skin only or silo closure in the critically ill patient with an open abdomen. Am J Surg 2001;182:670.
9. Regenet N, Pessaux P, Hennekinne S, et al. Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003;18:503.
10. Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Carlomagno N, et al. Safety of primary anastomosis in emergency colo-rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:262.
11. Hau T, Ohmann C, Wolmershauser A, et al. Planned relaparotomy vs relaparotomy on demand in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. The Peritonitis Study Group of the Surgical Infection Society-Europe. Arch Surg 1995;130:1193.
12. Wittmann DH, Aprahamian C, Bergstein JM.. Etappenlavage: advanced diffuse peritonitis managed by planned multiple laparotomies utilizing zippers, slide fastener, and Velcro analogue for temporary abdominal closure. World J Surg 1990;14:218.
13. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1476.
14. Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH.. Sepsis and septic shock - a review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res 1980;29:189.
15. Reijnen MM, Meis JF, Postma VA, et al. Prevention of intra-abdominal abscesses and adhesions using a hyaluronic acid solution in a rat peritonitis model. Arch Surg 1999;134:997.
16. de Hingh IH, de Man BM, Lomme RM, et al. Colonic anastomotic strength and matrix metalloproteinase activity in an experimental model of bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg 2003;90:981.
17. Reijnen MM, de Man BM, Hendriks T, et al. Hyaluronic acid-based agents do not affect anastomotic strength in the rat colon, in either the presence or absence of bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1222.
18. Kuzu MA, Tanik A, Kale IT, et al. Effect of ischemia/reperfusion as a systemic phenomenon on anastomotic healing in the left colon. World J Surg 2000;24:990.
19. Tekin K, Aytekin F, Ozden A, et al. Antithrombin III prevents deleterious effects of remote ischemia-reperfusion injury on healing of colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 2002;184:160.
20. Reddy GK, Enwemeka CS.. A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in biological tissues. Clin Biochem 1996;29:225.
21. Zuhlke HV, Lorenz EM, Straub EM, et al. [Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1990;1009.
22. Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, et al. Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 1997;84:380.
23. Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Marti Rague J, et al. Role of resection and primary anastomosis of the left colon in the presence of peritonitis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1580.
24. Runkel NS, Hinz U, Lehnert T, et al. Improved outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg 1998;85:1260.
25. Salem L, Flum DR. Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1953.
26. Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, et al. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 2002;26:499.
27. Bosscha K, Hulstaert PF, Visser MR, et al. Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis. Eur J Surg 2000;166:44.
28. Bosscha K, van Vroonhoven TJ, van der Werken C.. Surgical management of severe secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg 1999;86:1371.
29. de Hingh IH, van Goor H, de Man BM, et al. No detrimental effects of repeated laparotomies on early healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:534.
30. Christensen H, Chemnitz J, Christensen BC, et al. Collagen structural organization of healing colonic anastomoses and the effect of growth hormone treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1200.
31. Barbul A. Wound healing. In Brunicardi FC, ed., Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 8th edition, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2005;223.
32. Thornton FJ, Barbul A.. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:549.
33. Mansson P, Zhang XW, Jeppsson B, et al. Anastomotic healing in the rat colon: comparison between a radiological method, breaking strength and bursting pressure. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002;17:420.
34. Kologlu M, Yorganci K, Renda N, et al. Effect of local and remote ischemia-reperfusion injury on healing of colonic anastomoses. Surgery 2000;128:99.
35. Witte MB, Barbul A.. Repair of full-thickness bowel injury. Crit Care Med 2003;31:S538.
36. Irvin TT. Effects of malnutrition and hyperalimentation on wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978;146:33.
37. Haciyanli M, Fuzun M, Unek T, et al. Does the administration route of leucovorin have any influence on the impairment of colonic healing caused by intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil treatment? Eur Surg Res 2001;33:80.
38. diZerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:547.
39. Ellis H. The causes and prevention of intestinal adhesions. Br J Surg 1982;69:241.
40. Rotstein OD.. Role of fibrin deposition in the pathogenesis of intraabdominal infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992;11:1064.
41. Luijendijk RW, de Lange DC, Wauters CC, et al. Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg 1996;223:242.
42. Zografos GC, Simeonidis KM, Messaris EG, et al. Adhesion formation and intraperitoneal catheters: histologic findings in a rat model. Fertil Steril 2005;83:516.
43. von Recum AF, van Kooten TG.. The influence of microtopography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. J Biomater Sci Polymer Ed 1995; 7:181.