Effects of interface workload of in-vehicle information systems on driving safety

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1937, 2005, Pages 73-78

  Chen, Wan Hui ^a   Lin, Chih Yung ^b   Doong, Ji Liang ^c,d  

^a CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b LUNGHWA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d I SHOU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ALARM SYSTEMS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SPECIAL EFFECTS; TRAFFIC SIGNALS;

AUDITORY WARNING; DRIVER'S VISUAL; INTERSECTION COLLISION WARNING SYSTEMS (ICWS); VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33645520179     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1937-11     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cheng, B., M. Hashimoto, and T. Suetomi. Analysis of Driver Response to Collision Warning During Car Following. JSAE Review, Vol. 23, 2002, pp. 231-237.
2. Ben-Yaacov, A., M. Maltz, and D. Shinar. Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short-and Long-Term Driving Performance. Human Factors, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2002.
3. Moon, Y.-J., J. Lee, and Y. Park, System Integration and Field Tests for Developing In-Vehicle Dilemma Zone Warning System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1826, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 53-59.
4. Belz, S. M., G. S. Robinson, and J. G. Casali. A New Class of Auditory Warning Signals for Complex Systems: Auditory Icons. Human Factors, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1999.
5. Chen, W.-H., and P. P. Jovanis. Driver En Route Guidance Compliance and Driver Learning with Advanced Traveler Information Systems: Analysis with Travel Simulation Experiment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1843, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 81-88.
6. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Gary, N.C., 1996.
7. Littell, R. C. Modeling Variation in Repeated Measures Data. Proc., Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, SAS Institute, Inc., Gary, N.C., 1995.
8. Wolfinger, R., and M. Chang. Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED Procedures for Repeated Measures. Proc., Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, SAS Institute, Inc., Gary, N.C., 1995.
9. Nowakowski, C., and P. Green. Map Design: An On-the-Road Evaluation of the Time to Read Electronic Navigation Displays. Technical Report UMTRI-98-4. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 1998.
10. Green, P. Why Safety and Human Factors/Ergonomics Standards Are So Difficult to Establish. In Human Factors in Transportation, Communication, Health and the Workplace (D. de Waard, K. Brookhuis, J. Moraal, and A. Toffetti, eds.), Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2002.
11. Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, Version 3. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Washington, D.C., 2003.