Educational accountability in a regulated market

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 217-235

  Adams Jr , Jacob E ^a   Hill, Paul T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645519587     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930pje8101_10     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adams, J. E., Jr., & Kirst, M. W. (1999). New demands and concepts for educational accountability. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 463-489). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State of New York, 655 N.E.2d 661 (N.Y., 1995).
3. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
4. Coons, J. E., & Sugarman, S. D. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. DeArmond, M., Taggart, S., & Hill, P. (2002). The future of school facilities: Getting ahead of the curve. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.
6. Education Commission of the States. (1996). Bending without breaking. Denver, CO: Author.
7. Education Commission of the States. (1999). Governing America's schools: Changing the rules, report of the National Commission on Governing America's Schools. Denver, CO: Author.
8. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose. New York: Avon.
9. Hill, P. T. (1999). The supply-side of school choice. In S. D. Sugarman & F. R. Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy: Politics, policy, and law (pp. 140-173). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
10. Hill, P. T. (2001). Education philanthropy for the 21st century. Retrieved from www.edexcellence.net/institute/publication/ publication.cfm?id=318
11. Hill, P. T., & Lake, R. (2002). Standards and accountability in Washington state. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers in education policy 2002 (pp. 199-225). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
12. Hill, P. T., Pierce, L. C., & Guthrie, J. W. (1997). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America's schools. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13. Hoxby, C. M. (2002). Would school choice change the teaching profession? Journal of Human Resources, 37, 846-891.
14. Kolderie, T. (1990). Beyond choice to new public schools: Withdrawing the exclusive franchise in public education (Policy Report No. 8). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
15. Maranto, R., Milliman, S., Hess, F., & Gresham, A. (1999). In lieu of conclusions: Tentative lessons from a contested frontier. In R. Maranto, S. Milliman, F. Hess, & A. Gresham (Eds.), School choice in the real world: Lessons from Arizona charter schools (pp. 237-247). Boulder, CO: Westview.
16. Moe, T. M. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. Chubb & P. Peterson (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 267-329). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
17. Moe, T. M. (2002). The structure of school choice. In P. T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 179-212). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
18. National Research Council. (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. National Working Commission on Choice in K-12 Education. (2003). School choice: Doing it the right way makes a difference. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
20. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).