Coronary angiography using 4 French catheters with power injection: A randomized comparison with 6 French catheters

Indian Heart Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 184-188

  Arora, Parneesh ^a   Naik, Nitish ^a   Bahl, V K ^a   Mishra, S ^a   Yadav, R ^a   Sharma, S ^a   Manchanda, S C ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

4 french catheters; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VENTRICLE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILIZATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; EARLY AMBULATION; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036490270     PISSN: 00194832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Noto TJ Jr, Johnson LW, Krone R, Weaver WF, Clark DA, Kramer JR Jr, et al. Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991; 24: 75-83
2. Skillman JJ, Kim D, Baim DS. Vascular complications of percutaneous femoral cardiac interventions. Incidence and operative repair. Arch Surg 1988; 125: 1207-1212
3. Wheeldon NM. Coronary angiography using 4 French catheters. Int J Cardiol 2001; 80: 5-6
4. Domingo E, Lupon-Roses J, Angel J, Anivarro I, Soler-Soler J. Five French versus eight French catheters and the fudkins technique. Advantages and limitations for studying coronary artery disease. Int J Card Imaging 1998; 3: 61-65
5. Hui WK, Klinke WP, Kubac G, Talibi T. Comparison of 5F and 7/8F catheters for left ventricular and coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovac Diagn 1990; 19: 84-86
6. Metz D, Chapoutot L, Brasselet C, Jolly D. Randomized evaluation of four versus five French catheters for transfemoral coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22: 29-32
7. Kern MJ, Cohen M, Talley JD, Litvack F, Serota H, Aguirre F. et al. Early ambulation after 5 French diagnostic cardiac catheterization: results of a multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 1475-1483
8. Brown RI, Macdonald AC. Use of 5 French catheters for cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography: a critical review. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1987; 13: 214-217
9. Khoukaz S, Kern MJ, Bitar SR, Azrak E, Eisenhauer M, Wolford T, et al. Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with Acisted power injection: a randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 393-398
10. Chahoud G, Khoukaz S, El-Shafei A, Azrak E, Bitar S, Kern MJ. Randomized comparison of coronary angiography using 4 F catheters: 4 F manual versus "Acisted" power injection technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 221-224
11. Todd DM, Hubner PJ, Hudson N, Sarma J, McCance AJ, Caplin J. Multicenter, prospective, randomized trial of 4 vs. 6 French catheters in 410 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 54: 269-275
12. Danzi GB, Capuano C, Sesana M, Di Blasi A, Predolini S, Laterza C, et al. A randomized comparison of the use of 4 and 6 French diagnostic catheters: the limits of downsizing. Int J Cardiol 2001; 79: 113-117; discussion 117-118
13. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, Morice MC. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 181-187
14. Hildick-Smith DJ, Lowe MD, Walsh JT, Ludman PF, Stephens NG, Schofield PM, et al. Coronary angiography from the radial artery -experience, complications and limitations, Int J Cardiol 1998; 64: 231-239