Leadership matters: So does the attitude of the leader

Administration and Society

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 268-276

  Zingale, Nicholas C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b University of Akron ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645498551     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399705286151     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Ammenberg, J., & Hjelm, O. (2003). Tracing business and environmental effects of environmental management systems: A study of networking small and medium-sized enterprises using a joint environmental management system. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 163-174.
2. Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Azzone, G., Carlens, J., Drunen, M., Jasch, C., et al. (2001). Measuring the environmental performance of industry. Final report, EC Environment and Climate Research Programme: Research Theme 4. Human dimensions of environmental change. Brighton, UK/Milan/Wein, Germany/Amsterdam/Louvain-le-Neuve, France/ Guildford, UK/Sevilla, Spain: SPRU/Politecnico di Milano/Institut fur Oekologische Wirtschaftsforschung/IES, Vrije Universiteit/CEE, Université Catholique de Louvain/ CES, University of Surrey/IPTS.
3. Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9-30.
4. Corbett, L. M. & Cutler, D. J. (2000). Environmental management systems in the New Zealand plastics industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20 (2). 204-224.
5. Delmas, M. A. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35, 91-119.
6. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the newecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3). 425-442.
7. Ghisellini, A. & Thurston, D. L. (2004). Decision traps in ISO 14001 implementation process: Case study results from Illinois certified companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 763-777.
8. Global Environment and Technology Foundation. (2000). The U.S. EPA environmental management system pilot program for local government entities (Assistance Agreement No. X 825557-01-0). Annandale, VA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
9. Hendrickson, L. U. & Tuttle, D. B. (1997). Dynamic management of the environmental enterprise: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Organization Change Management, 10 (4). 363-382.
10. Howard, J., Nash, J., & Ehrenfeld, J. (1999). Industry codes as agents of change: Responsible care adoption by U.S. chemical companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8, 281-295.
11. Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., & Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination. Journal of Business Research, 55, 193-204.
12. Kraft, M. E. (2004). Environmental policy and politics (3rd ed.) New York: Person Longman.
13. Krut, R., & Glechman, H. (1998). ISO 14001: A missed opportunity for sustainable global industrial development. London: Earthscan.
14. Llomaki, M. & Melanen, M. (2001). Waste minimization in small and medium-sized enterprises: Do environmental management systems help? Journal of Clean Production, 9 (3). 209-217.
15. Petroni, A. (2001). Developing a methodology for analysis of benefits and shortcomings of ISO 14001 registrations: Lessons from experience of a large machinery manufacturer. Journal of Clean Production, 9 (4). 351-364.
16. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2004). The regulation dilemma: Cooperation and conflict in environmental governance. Public Administration Review, 64 (2). 137-148.
17. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24 (4). 745-769.
18. Prakash, A. (1999). A new-institutionalist perspective on ISO 14000 and responsible care. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8, 322-335.
19. Raines, S. S., & Prakash, A. (2005). Leadership matters: Policy entrepreneurship in corporate environmental policy making. Administration & Society, 37 (1). 3-22.
20. Rondinelli, D., & Vastag, G. (2000). Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management Journal, 18 (5). 499-510.
21. Sholz, J. T., & Gray, W. B. (1997). Can government facilitate cooperation? An informational model of OSHA enforcement. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 693-717.
22. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
23. Tan, L. P. (2003). Implementing ISO 14001: Is it beneficial for firms in newly industrialized Malaysia? Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 397-404.
24. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (2003). Final report. In A. Hutson (Ed.), Environmental management systems: Do they improve performance? Chapel Hill, NC: Author. Available from http://ndems.cas.unc.edu/
25. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Zingale, N. C. (2004). Self-regulation in environmental policy: Fact or chimera. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, Ohio.