The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 193-204

  Kilbourne, William E ^a   Beckmann, Suzanne C ^b   Thelen, Eva ^c  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Dominant social paradigm; Environment; Environmental attitudes

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012951295     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00141-7     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson TW, Cunningham WH. The socially conscious consumer. J Mark 1972;36(3):23-31.
2. Arbuthnot J. The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge. Environ Behav 1977;9:217-32 (June).
3. Balderjahn I. Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. J Bus Res 1988; 17:51-6 (August).
4. Beck U. Ecological enlightenment. Essays on the politics of risk society. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1995.
5. Bohlen G, Schlegelmilch BB, Diamantopoulos A. Measuring ecological concern: a multi-construct perspective. J Mark Manage 1993;9(4): 415-30.
6. Coddington W. Environmental marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
7. Cotgrove S. Catastrophe or cornucopia: the environment, politics, and the future. New York: Wiley, 1982.
8. Daly HE. Steady-state economics. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1991.
9. Dobson A. Green political thought. London: Harper Collins Academic, 1990.
10. Dowie M. Losing ground: American environmentalism at the close of the twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
11. Drengson A. The practice of technology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1995.
12. Drumwright ME. Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. J Mark 1994;58: 1-19 (July).
13. Dryzek JS. Rational ecology: environment and political economy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1987.
14. Dryzek JS. Democracy in capitalist times: ideals, limits, and struggles. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1996.
15. Dunlap RE. Public opinion and environmental policy. In: Lester JP, editor. Environmental politics and policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989. pp. 87-134.
16. Dunlap RE. Public opinion in the 1980's: clear consensus, ambiguous commitment. Environment 1991;33:10-5.
17. Dunlap RE, van Liere KD. The "new environmental paradigm": a proposed instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 1978;9:10-9.
18. Dunlap RE, van Liere KD. Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Soc Sci Q 1984;65:1013-28.
19. Eckersley R. Environmentalism and political theory: toward an ecocentric approach. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
20. Ehrenfeld D. The arrogance of humanism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1978.
21. Ellen PS, Wiener JL, Cobb-Walgren C. The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. J Public Policy Mark 1991;10(2):102-17.
22. Garrod B, Chadwick P. Environmental management and business strategy: towards a new strategic paradigm. Futures 1996;28(1):37-50.
23. Grunert SC. Everybody seems concerned about the environment: but is this concern reflected in (Danish) consumers' food choice? In: van Raaij WF, Bamoosy GJ, editors. Advances in consumer research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 1993. pp. 428-33.
24. Grunert SC, Juhl HJ. Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. J Econ Psychol 1995;16(1):39-62.
25. Grunert-Beckmann SC, Kilbourne WE. The dominant social paradigm, value systems, and environmental concern: Examining the human triad's (in)compatibilities. In: Falkenberg A, Rittenburg TL, editors. 22nd Macromarketing Conference Proceedings. Bergen, Norway, Lincoln, Nebraska: Macromarketing Association, University of Nebraska, 1997. pp.122-8.
26. Grunert-Beckmann SC, Knudsen T. Motivational structures for a change towards sustainable consumption and production patterns. In: Roland-Levy C, editor. Social and economic representations. Paris: International Association of Economic Psychology, 1996. pp. 68-72.
27. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 1968;162:1243-8.
28. Hirschman AO. The passions and the interests: political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.
29. Jennings PD, Zandbergen PA. Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Acad Manage Rev 1995;20(4):1015-52.
30. Kassarjian HH. Incorporating ecology into marketing strategy: the case of air pollution. J Mark 1971;35(3):61-5.
31. Kilbourne WE, Beckmann SC. Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. J Mark Manage 1998; 14(6):513-32.
32. Kilbourne W, McDonagh P, Prothero A. Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: a macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm. J Macromark 1997;17(1):4-24.
33. Kinnear TC, Taylor JR, Ahmed SA. Ecologically concerned consumers: who are they? J Mark 1974;38:20-4.
34. Krause D. Environmental consciousness: an empirical study. Environ Behav 1993;25:126-42 (January).
35. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
36. MacPherson CB. The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
37. McCarty JA, Shrum LJ. The recycling of solid wastes: personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. J Bus Res 1994;30:53-62.
38. Milbrath L. Environmentalists: vanguards for a new society. Albany, NY: University of New York Press, 1984.
39. O'Neill J. Ecology, policy and politics. London: Routledge, 1993.
40. Ophuls W. Ecology and the politics of scarcity: a prologue to a political theory of the steady state. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1977.
41. Ottman JA. Green marketing: challenges and opportunities for the new marketing age. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books, 1993.
42. Palmer K, Oates WE, Portnoy PR. Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 1995;9: 119-32 (Fall).
43. Pickett GM, Kangun N, Grove SJ. Is there a general conserving consumer? A public policy concern. J Public Policy Mark 1993;12(2):234-43.
44. Pilling BK, Crosby LA, Ellen PS. Using benefit segmentation to influence environmental legislation: a bottle bill application. J Public Policy Mark 1991;10(2):28-46.
45. Pirages DC, Ehrlich PR. Ark II: social response to environmental imperatives. San Francisco: Freeman, 1974.
46. Porter ME. America's green strategy. Sci Am 1991;263:168 (April).
47. Postman N. Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books, 1993.
48. Purser RE, Park C, Montuori A. Limits to anthropocentrism: toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Acad Manage Rev 1995;20(4): 1053-89.
49. Roberts JA. Green consumers in the 1990's: profile and implications for advertising. J Bus Res 1996;36(3):217-31.
50. Sagoff M. The economy of earth. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
51. Samdahl DM, Robertson R. Social determinants of environmental concern: specification and test of the model. Environ Behav 1989;21(1): 57-81.
52. Scherhorn G. Consumer's concern about the environment and its impact on business. J Consum Policy 1993;16:171-91.
53. Schwepker CH, Cornwell TB. An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. J Public Policy Mark 1991;10(2):77-101.
54. Scott D, Willits FK. Environmental attitudes and behavior: a Pennsylvania survey. Environ Behav 1994;26(2):239-60.
55. Sen AK. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philos Public Affairs 1977;6:317-44.
56. Sharma S. Applied multivariate techniques. New York: Wiley, 1996.
57. Shrivastava P. Ecocentric management for a risk society. Acad Manage Rev 1995a;20(1):118-37.
58. Shrivastava P. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manage Rev 1995b;20(4):936-60.
59. Singhapakdi A, LaTour MS. The link between social responsibility orientation, motive appeals and voting intentions: a case of an anti-littering campaign. J Public Policy Mark 1991;10(2):118-29.
60. Smith A. The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1976.
61. Smith TM. The myth of green marketing: tending our goats at the edge of apocalypse. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.
62. Stern PC, Dietz T, Guagnano GA. The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environ Behav 1995;27(6):723-43.
63. Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ Behav 1993;25(3):322-48.
64. Synodinos NE. Environmental attitudes and knowledge: a comparison of marketing and business students with other groups. J Bus Res 1990;20(2):161-70.
65. Thurow LC. The zero-sum society: distribution and the possibilities for economic change. New York: Basic Books, 1980.
66. van Liere KD, Dunlap RE. The social bases of environmental concerns: a review of hypotheses. Explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opin Q 1980;44:43-59.
67. van Liere KD, Dunlap RE. Environmental concern: does it make a difference how it's measured? Environ Behav 1981;13(6):651-76.
68. Walley N, Whitehead B. It's not easy being green. Harvard Bus Rev 1994;72(3):46-52.
69. Winner L. Autonomous technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.
70. Winner L. The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
71. Wong V, Turner W, Stoneman P. Marketing strategies and market prospects for environmentally-friendly consumer products. Br J Manage 1996;7: 263-81.
72. Zimmer MR, Stafford TF, Stafford MR. Green issues: dimensions of environmental concern. J Bus Res 1994;30:63-74.