Subjective performance

Virtual Reality

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 226-233

  Bormann, Karsten ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Mozambique)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645469066     PISSN: 13594338     EISSN: 14349957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-006-0019-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Welch R (1999) How can we determine if the sense of presence affects task performance. Presence 8.5:574-577
2. Witmer B, Singer M (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 7.3:225-240
3. Bailey J, Witmer B (1994) Learning and transferf spatial knowledge in a virtual environment. proc. In: Human factors and ergonomics society 38th annual meeting, pp 1158-1162
4. Swedish Institute Of Computer Science (1999) DIVE 3.3, Distributed virtual environment. http://www.sics.se/dive
5. Adler D (1996) Virtual audio: Three-dimensional audio in virtual environments. Technical report T96:03, Swedish Institute of Computer Science (ISRN: SICS-T-96/03-SE). http://www.ftp.sics.se/pub/SICS-reports/ Reports/SICS-T-96-03-SE.ps.Z
6. Freeman J, Avons S, Pearson D, IJsselsteijn W (1999) Effects of sensory information and prior experience on direct subjective ratings of presence. Presence 8.1:1-13
7. Bormann K (2002) Context calibration. Virtual Real Res Dev Appl 6.1:45-55
8. Bormann K (2005) Presence and the utility of audio spatialization. Presence 15.3:278-297
9. Normand V (1999) The COVEN project: Exploring applicative, technical, and usage dimensions of collaborative virtual environments. Presence 8.2:218-236
10. Uno S, Slater M (1997) The sensitivity of presence to collision response. In: Proc VRAIS'97, pp 95-103
11. Tromp J, Bullock A, Steed A, Sadagic A, Slater M, Frecon E (1998) Small group behavior experiments in the Coven project. Comput Graph Appl Nov/ Dec:53-63
12. Slater M (1999) Measuring presence: A response to the witmer and singer presence questionnaire. Presence 8.5:560-565
13. Singer M (1999) On selecting the right yardstick. Presence 8.5:566-573
14. The SAS System 8e, SAS Institute 2001
15. Banerjee A, Banerjee P, Ye N, Dech F (1999) Assembly Planning Effectiveness Using Virtual Reality. Presence 8.2:204-217
16. Sun H, Hujun B, Man T, Fai W (1999) Interactive Task Planning in Virtual Assembly. Proc. VRST'99, 174-175
17. Loomis J (1992) Distal attribution and presence. Presence 1.1:113
18. Sheridan T (1992) Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence 1.1:120
19. Zahorik P, Jenison R (1998) Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence 7.1:78
20. Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Muffin
21. Warren W (1984) Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10.5:683-703
22. Mark L (1987) Eyeheight scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:361-370
23. Smets G, Stappers P, Overbeeke K, der Mast C (1994) Designing in virtual reality: Implementing perception-action coupling with affordances. In: Proceedings of VRST'94, p 97
24. Smets G, Stappers P, Overbeeke K, van der Mast C (1995) Designing in virtual reality: Perception-action coupling and affordances. In: Carr K, England R (eds) Simulated and virtual realities: Elements of perception. Taylor & Francis, London