Presence and the utility of audio spatialization

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 278-297

  Bormann, Karsten ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544454161     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105474605323384645     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Adler, D. (1996). Virtual audio: Three-dimensional audio in virtual environments. Technical Report T96:03, Swedish Institute of Computer Science (ISRN: SICS-T-96/03-SE). Available from: ftp://rtp.sics.se/pub/SICS-reports/ Reports/SICS-T-96-03-SE.ps.Z.
2. Bormann, K. (2002). Context calibration. Virtual Reality, 6(1), 45-55.
3. Bystrom, K., Barfield, W., & Hendrix, C. (1999). A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environments, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8(2), 241-244.
4. Cherry, C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 975-979.
5. Doll, T., & Hanna, T. (1997). Directional cueing effects in auditory recognition. In R. H. Gilkey & T.R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments, (pp. 377-397). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Ericson, M., & McKinley, R. (1997). The intelligibility of multiple talkers separated spatially in noise. In R H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 701-724). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Freeman, J., Avons, S., Pearson, D., & IJsselsteijn, W. (1999). Effects of sensory information and prior experience on direct subjective ratings of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(1), 1.
8. Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1995). Presence in virtual environments as a function of visual and auditory cues. Proceedings of VRAIS, 74-82.
9. Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996). The sense of presence within auditory virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 290-301.
10. Kalawsky, R. (1993). The science of virtual reality and virtual environments. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
11. Loomis, J. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 113-119.
12. McKinley, R., & Ericson, M. (1997). Fight demonstration of a 3-D auditory display. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 683-700). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Mershon, D. (1997). Phenomenal geometry and the measurement of perceived auditory distance. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 257-274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Murray, C., Arnold, P., & Thornton, B. (2000). Presence accompagning induced hearing loss. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 137-148.
15. Normand, V. (1999). The COVEN project: Exploring applicative, technical, and usage dimensions of collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(2), 218-236.
16. Pope, S., & Fahlen, L. (1993). The use of 3-D audio in a synthetic environment: An aural renderer for a distributed virtual reality system. Proceedings of VRAIS, 176-182.
17. Psotka, J., Lewis, S., & King, D. (1998). Effects of field of view on judgments of self-location: Distortions in distance estimations even when the image geometry exactly fits the field of view. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(4), 352-369.
18. SAS Institute. (2001). The SAS System 8e.
19. Shaw, E. (1997). Acoustical features of the human external ear. In R.H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 25-48). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. SICS, (1999). DIVE 3.3, Distributed Virtual Environment, Swedish Institute Of Computer Science. Available from: www.sics.se/dive.
21. Tromp, J., Bullock, A., Steed, A., Sadagic, A., Slater, M., & Frecon, E. (1998; Nov./Dec.). Small group behavior experiments in the COVEN project. Computer Graphics and Applications, 53-63.
22. Uno, S., & Slater, M. (1997). The sensitivity of presence of collision response. Proceedings of VRAIS, 95-103.
23. Walker, G., Bowskill, J., Hollier, M., & McGrath, A. (2000). Telepresence: Understanding people as content. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 119-136.
24. Welch, R. (1999). How can we determine if the sense of presence affects task performance? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(5), 574-577.
25. Wenzel, E. (1992). Localization in virtual acoustic displays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 80-107.
26. Witmer, B., & Singer, M. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240.
27. Yost, W. (1997). The cocktail party problem: Forty years later. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments, (pp. 329-348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.